BUSH'S IMPEACHABLE OFFENCES

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,397
94
48
Re: RE: BUSH'S IMPEACHABLE OF

Toro said:
Its fun watching you guys bang your head against the wall.


a little sadistic isn't it ?? :twisted:


Hey, you guys want bush to rule for life.......go for it. We all in the rest of this world will be watching the US closer than ever before. Must be quite interesting to live in a fishbowl existence. The US is under the microscope now as never before.

but each to his own.

(don't think the bush regime will be able to get away with too many more "pre-emptive " invasions though......unless it wants a planetary disaster. Interesting to see such blind support for a leader who's "ratings" are dropping ..... (almost time for another terror alert " and get the sheeple back in line)
 

moghrabi

House Member
May 25, 2004
4,508
4
38
Canada
Re: RE: BUSH'S IMPEACHABLE OF

Toro said:
There are no impeachable offenses.

Killing, lying, invading, fixing the votes and so on may be not impeachable under your crooked law but a semen on a dress can impeach a prez!!!!!

What the hell is wrong you blind people?
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,397
94
48
The Downing Street Memo and the Case for Impeachment

Tomorrow, June 16, Congressman John Conyers will hold a hearing into the Downing Street Memo, the leaked British briefing notes that document the Bush Administration's intention to attack Iraq and its efforts to create public rationale for their pre-planned illegal war.

The Downing Street Memo is the "smoking gun" for those still searching for one indicting President Bush and his administration for high crimes and misdemeanors of the most serious and deadly kind. Its authenticity has not been disputed by either the British or U.S. governments since it was made public by the Times of London on May 1, 2005. While largely ignored for nearly a month by most of the corporate media here, it has now made its way into some news outlets. Rep. John Conyers and 88 other members of Congress have demanded an explanation from the White House.

The memo is a document containing minutes transcribed during a meeting between British Prime Minister Tony Blair, members of his cabinet and other top military and security officials, on July 23, 2002. The head of British foreign intelligence (MI 6), Richard Dearlove, identified in the memo as "C," had just returned from a meeting with the U.S. National Security Council in Washington.

"C reported on his recent talks in Washington. There was a perceptible shift in attitude. Military action was now seen as inevitable. Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy. The NSC had no patience with the UN route, and no enthusiasm for publishing material on the Iraqi regime's record. There was little discussion in Washington of the aftermath after military action."

The key phrase here is, "the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy." It makes clear beyond question that the Bush administration had set the course for war on Iraq at least eight months before the U.S./British invasion.

In recent days, additional leaked British memos have confirmed the underlying information in the Downing Street Memo and further revealed that the Bush administration was making its plans to launch a war against Iraq and to find a basis to justify the illegal attack as early as March 2002. For instance a memo dated March 22, 2002, revealed that officials in the Blair government recognized that additional efforts would need to be made to justify the war since there was a lack of proof of connections between the Iraqi government and Al Qaida, and that the Iraqi government was not arming itself with weapons of mass destruction as the Bush Administration had claimed.

Now, more than 26 months after the invasion, 100,000 Iraqis have been killed (according to the British medical journal The Lancet) and Iraq is in chaos. Over 1,700 U.S. troops have been killed and tens of thousands have been maimed, suffering from serious wounds, injuries and illnesses, including enormous psychological trauma.

All this killing, dying and suffering is the result of a war justified by a deliberate campaign of unmitigated lies and deception knowingly carried out by Bush and his top associates - Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Powell, Wolfowitz, et. al. All who remain in office should be removed and face trial for their war crimes. It is worth noting that the most serious category of war crimes is the Crime Against Peace; that is, planning and carrying out a war of aggression against another state which poses no threat to the aggressor state.

tomorrow will be interesting.


now, did someone say something about "no impeachable offenses??? Watch the spin meisters go after this one. Could be dizzying.
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,397
94
48
mog: might be a good idea to "impeach" (take to trial) all those bushites that supported this insanity too.

That should leave the saner part of America to rebuild the US into what the original founders wanted it to be.
 

moghrabi

House Member
May 25, 2004
4,508
4
38
Canada
Lets go down there, impeach them all, and take their country. They have oil down there you know and WMD for real. So we won't be lying.
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,397
94
48
Re: RE: BUSH'S IMPEACHABLE OF

I think not said:
Toro said:
There are no impeachable offenses.

Sure there are. But they can't do anything about it anyway. So what does it matter?

It MATTERS a great deal ....on many levels. One being the offenses themselves........and the fact that "they" have so much power they might prevent this kind of hearing.

That speaks to the society in bush country.

and furthermore : It SHOULD matter.
 

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
Re: RE: BUSH'S IMPEACHABLE OF

Ocean Breeze said:
I think not said:
Toro said:
There are no impeachable offenses.

Sure there are. But they can't do anything about it anyway. So what does it matter?

It MATTERS a great deal ....on many levels. One being the offenses themselves........and the fact that "they" have so much power they might prevent this kind of hearing.

That speaks to the society in bush country.

and furthermore : It SHOULD matter.

No you missed my point. It doesn't matter by any of you who complain about him, those outside the US. You don't matter.
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,397
94
48
Re: RE: BUSH'S IMPEACHABLE OFFENCES

moghrabi said:
Lets go down there, impeach them all, and take their country. They have oil down there you know and WMD for real. So we won't be lying.

another idea would be to arrest them as they leave the US. The minute any of them (gov't and its supporters ) land in another nation. ARREST them. International would have a provision for that. Following arrest , immediately transport them to one of their own "secret locations" where they do torture and other kinds of inhumane things. (sadistic bunch that "they" can be) Hold them indefinately, without legal council, no visits from the Red Cross or AI.


(furthermore , who in their right mind wants to go into bush country anyhow. :wink:
 

moghrabi

House Member
May 25, 2004
4,508
4
38
Canada
Re: RE: BUSH'S IMPEACHABLE OFFENCES

I think not said:
moghrabi said:
Lets go down there, impeach them all, and take their country. They have oil down there you know and WMD for real. So we won't be lying.

You can always try.

I wouldn't even try. I might learn something bad down there and start LYING. :lol:
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,397
94
48
Re: RE: BUSH'S IMPEACHABLE OF

I think not said:
Ocean Breeze said:
I think not said:
Toro said:
There are no impeachable offenses.

Sure there are. But they can't do anything about it anyway. So what does it matter?

It MATTERS a great deal ....on many levels. One being the offenses themselves........and the fact that "they" have so much power they might prevent this kind of hearing.

That speaks to the society in bush country.

and furthermore : It SHOULD matter.

No you missed my point. It doesn't matter by any of you who complain about him, those outside the US. You don't matter.

VERY WRONG. As long as bush and his regime intefere OUTSIDE the US ......it matters to everyone on this planet. If this was not about an invasion in a far off land ......it would be the US business.
 

Toro

Senate Member
May 24, 2005
5,468
109
63
Florida, Hurricane Central
Re: RE: BUSH'S IMPEACHABLE OFFENCES

Ocean Breeze said:
another idea would be to arrest them as they leave the US. The minute any of them (gov't and its supporters ) land in another nation. ARREST them. International would have a provision for that. Following arrest , immediately transport them to one of their own "secret locations" where they do torture and other kinds of inhumane things. (sadistic bunch that "they" can be) Hold them indefinately, without legal council, no visits from the Red Cross or AI.


(furthermore , who in their right mind wants to go into bush country anyhow. :wink:

That winking avatar is for the whole paragraph, right? Especially the bolded part, right?
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,397
94
48
Re: RE: BUSH'S IMPEACHABLE OFFENCES

I think not said:
moghrabi said:
Lets go down there, impeach them all, and take their country. They have oil down there you know and WMD for real. So we won't be lying.

You can always try.
:lol: :lol: :lol:


the favorite fall back position.

( along the lines of "we dare you"....... in traditional bully talk)
 

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
Re: RE: BUSH'S IMPEACHABLE OF

Ocean Breeze said:
VERY WRONG. As long as bush and his regime intefere OUTSIDE the US ......it matters to everyone on this planet. If this was not about an invasion in a far off land ......it would be the US business.

I didn't say it doesn't matter. I said those outside the US can't do anything about it hence YOU don't matter. Big difference.