I could go on about little old mediocre Canada, but you aren't worth the effort.
Uh huh, you post some pics of an unmanned submersible, the lame-ass Canadarm (Canadians really have to get over that--Canada got the gig instead of someone else, hardly the rocket science that got it up there) and ref a Wiki site of Canadians that have done
something worthy of mention. If this were a tiny third world country, I would agree with you but that is not the case. This is a country of squandered potential and gloating over petty achievements is mediocre.
put it this way.... he said we were plain because he couldnt really think of anything good to say.... Plain is what people like, believe it or not.... Down to earth, we appreciate all our intellectuals whatever level they are at.
life is too short to be show boating our culture, thats how wars start.
Yeah well life is too short to squander it on plainness.
Wars start precisely because people take the passive (or 'plain') approach and allow arrogant, self-interested fools to run the country. Who do you think got us into the Afghanistan mess we're presently in (at the insistence of our gimp-master to the South)?
"Plain" in this context does not = "down to earth." You're confusing clarity of mind with lack of thought. People tend to take the easy way out, that doesn't make it right. Down to earth = seeing things for what they are and when they need changing, acting accordingly. Canada has consistently failed to do that to the point that today, its status as a sovereign state is in question (a disastrous situation that doesn't seem to phase Canadians).
People in Morgan's position don't say things because they can't "really think of anything good to say." The statement was seriously meant to indicate mediocrity--he was referring to the population as a whole, not a small group of intellectuals, artists, politicians, scientists and otherwise above-average Canadians (note I'm not using 'above-average' in the elitist sense; I firmly believe that
all people can achieve great things, if they choose to and circumstances allow for it).
I would venture to guess that he was expressing dismay that is common in Britain and other European countries concerning Canada. A country with so much potential that has achieved so very little given it's advantages is hardly something to be proud of.
The criticism is precisely that Canadians
do showboat their culture. The implication is that Canada is mediocre and tries to cover that up with a bloated, artificially nationalist culture full of real live heroes and heroins.
Canada has a responsibility to be more; at the very least be the sum of its parts, which it falls far short of. Accept it or not, that is the reality.