Britain leaves the European Union

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,808
1,890
113
I doubt they want to ruled by Brussels, Blackleaf..............but they sure as hell want the money that they gain from being part of the EU for without it the country would surely sink into bankruptcy.

The thing is, though, an independent Scotland won't be able to get into the EU.

For a start, according to the 1992 Maastricht Treaty, all new member states must have a deficit not exceeding 3% of GDP. Scotland's is a whopping 7%, seven times higher than the UK as a whole.

So the SNP wanting a new independence referendum to try and break away from the UK and rejoin the EU are just wasting their time. Scotland cannot rejoin.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,808
1,890
113
The new Cod War? Brexit trade tensions rise as UK 'hires more patrol boats' to keep out EU fishing fleet ahead of showdown over access to British waters

Britain is today bolstering the ranks of its fishing police force ahead of a potential showdown with the European Union over post-Brexit access to UK waters.

Fishing rights have already emerged as one of the key battlegrounds in future partnership talks between the UK and the EU.

Brussels is adamant that there must be 'reciprocal access' on fishing so that existing arrangements which allow European trawlers to fish near the UK can continue.

But the government is equally adamant that who fishes in British waters will solely be a decision for ministers and priority will be given to British boats.

Growing tension over future fishing access is likely to spark fears of a repeat of the so-called 'scallop wars' in 2018 which saw French and British boats angrily clash over access to shellfish off the coast of Normandy.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...e-UK-hires-patrol-boats-EU-fishing-fleet.html
 

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
76
Eagle Creek
The thing is, though, an independent Scotland won't be able to get into the EU.

For a start, according to the 1992 Maastricht Treaty, all new member states must have a deficit not exceeding 3% of GDP. Scotland's is a whopping 7%, seven times higher than the UK as a whole.

So the SNP wanting a new independence referendum to try and break away from the UK and rejoin the EU are just wasting their time. Scotland cannot rejoin.


Right you are, Blackleaf and even less reason for Scotland's nonsensical stance regarding independence. In addition to having lost EU funding she would stand to lose the money she now gets from Britain. It's a head scratcher for sure.
 

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
76
Eagle Creek
The new Cod War? Brexit trade tensions rise as UK 'hires more patrol boats' to keep out EU fishing fleet ahead of showdown over access to British waters

Britain is today bolstering the ranks of its fishing police force ahead of a potential showdown with the European Union over post-Brexit access to UK waters.

Fishing rights have already emerged as one of the key battlegrounds in future partnership talks between the UK and the EU.

Brussels is adamant that there must be 'reciprocal access' on fishing so that existing arrangements which allow European trawlers to fish near the UK can continue.

But the government is equally adamant that who fishes in British waters will solely be a decision for ministers and priority will be given to British boats.

Growing tension over future fishing access is likely to spark fears of a repeat of the so-called 'scallop wars' in 2018 which saw French and British boats angrily clash over access to shellfish off the coast of Normandy.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...e-UK-hires-patrol-boats-EU-fishing-fleet.html


Stand firm Britain - protect your waters. We in Canada are aware of the cost to an economy - let alone people's livelihoods - when foreign fishers in invade our waters.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,808
1,890
113
Right you are, Blackleaf and even less reason for Scotland's nonsensical stance regarding independence. In addition to having lost EU funding she would stand to lose the money she now gets from Britain. It's a head scratcher for sure.

That's why the SNP have been against Brexit. They know that it makes Scottish independence much more unlikely. If they thought it made Scottish independence more likely they would have been in favour of it.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,808
1,890
113
Jonathan Pie's Hard Brexit

As Britain prepared to leave the EU, a camera crew was given unfettered access to Britain's notorious Westminster journalist Jonathan Pie:
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,808
1,890
113


How can Britain's Remainstream media justify wanting EU fishing fleets to continue plying their trade in British waters when Britain isn't a part of the EU?

Plus, how Johnson's Tories are still well ahead of Labour in the polls.

And a Leave voter who voted for the Tories for the first time receives a surprise visit from his hero - Boris Johnson.

 
Last edited:

Serryah

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 3, 2008
10,810
2,715
113
New Brunswick
Jonathan Pie's Hard Brexit

As Britain prepared to leave the EU, a camera crew was given unfettered access to Britain's notorious Westminster journalist Jonathan Pie:


After watching this I'm trying to figure out if you agree or disagree with him.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,808
1,890
113
Coffee House

Let’s not forget the unintentional heroes of Brexit

Patrick O'Flynn



Patrick O'Flynn
8 February 2020
The Spectator

A week on from Brexit day, it is worth stopping and reflecting on just how Britain’s departure from the EU actually came about. We’re familiar of course with those from the Leave side who contributed to Brexit. But what about the unintentional heroes of Brexit, those who ensured accidentally that Britain really did leave the EU?

On the day we were supposed to leave the EU last March, I bumped into an important member of Tony Blair’s social and political circle in the lobby of a St James’s club.

“Are the Tory Spartans holding firm? Are they going to stop May’s deal going through?” he asked.

“Yes, quite comfortably I think,” I replied.

“Good,” he said, “that’s what we need.”

He left me in no doubt that blocking May’s deal was seen by some as an essential precursor to stopping Brexit altogether by means of a second referendum.

Fortunately such thinking was shared by almost every Remainer MP that day. They subsequently voted it down. So the deal that Theresa May and Olly Robbins had designed as a bridge to the “closest possible relationship” between the UK and the EU (i.e. the deliberate handing to Brussels of the power to entrap us permanently in its rules) was scuppered for good.

Those MPs who turned down May’s shocker of a deal because they wanted nothing less than to cancel implementation of the referendum verdict altogether will surely be counted in an important category by future historians of this period: the unintentional heroes of Brexit.

There are many other actions by explicitly anti-Brexit campaigners that would admit them to this not very exclusive club.

Take, for example, Jo Swinson’s decision to get behind Boris Johnson’s wish for an early general election because she had been persuaded that the Lib Dems were well placed to make sweeping gains.

Anti-Brexit Lib Dem defector Chuka Umunna was a particularly enthusiastic advocate of this collective decision of the Lib Dem leadership. He said of an early December election:
‘We want to see Remain MPs in Parliament and that’s the only way we think to stop Brexit because you cannot rely on a Labour Party that has a significant minority of MPs who don’t want to stop Brexit who want to help it happen’
For making a decision that paved the way for Boris Johnson’s escape from the parliamentary predicament he was in, Umunna, too, must be counted as an accidental hero of Brexit. Thank you Jo and thank you Chuka.

And let’s not forget Gina Miller, who fought – and won – a court case that forced May to secure a Commons majority for her putative Brexit treaty rather than being permitted to push it through on prerogative powers.

Were it not for Ms Miller, May’s lock-in would have been enacted and pro-Brexit voters would now be contemplating the ugly truth that restored EU membership would give the UK more agency over its own fate than the ghastly form of non-membership devised by May.

Next we must turn to those who devised the ill-starred Tory “dementia tax” of the 2017 general election that deprived May of the majority she seemed certain to win. At the time, May’s creation of a hung parliament struck me as a disaster for Brexit. In fact, it turned out to be a huge blessing, scuppering her own dismal Brexit deal.

One of the proposal’s authors, May’s adviser Nick Timothy, was Downing Street’s most important pro-Brexit voice. He had been involved in the Vote Leave campaign, so we must leave him out of the club of accidental heroes. But his co-author on the Tory manifesto was Ben Gummer, a passionately pro-EU Tory MP. So, thanks Ben. A Brexit campaign medal is yours for the asking.

Angela Merkel and all the other EU leaders who humiliated David Cameron by giving him nothing of substance during his attempt to renegotiate the terms of British membership also provided us with an essential contribution. Given her seniority, nothing less than granting her a full state visit would seem a sufficient reward.

Finally, hero status must go to Jeremy Corbyn. Labour’s leader ensured, one presumes unintentionally, that the dominant pro-Remain offer at the 2019 general election was so polluted by socialism that people who might have been open to backing a Remainer party swung behind Boris Johnson instead. That’s got to be worth a Queen’s Gallantry Medal at least.

Historian Robert Conquest’s Third Law of politics states that the behaviour of any bureaucratic organisation is best understood by assuming it is controlled by a secret cabal of its enemies. The Brexit blockers did not form a single organisation and never seemed particularly bogged down in bureaucracy. But nonetheless, they succeeded in shooting their own desired objective in the foot on numerous occasions. Now that Brexit is done, it’s important to stop and remember these heroes of Brexit, even if they would themselves presumably be quite modest about their role.

The odds are that I will bump into my Blairite chum again before very long. And when I do, I am sure he will wish to join me in a chuckle at how it all worked out in the end.

https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2020/02/lets-not-forget-the-unintentional-heroes-of-brexit/
 
Last edited:

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,808
1,890
113
RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: Now Britain, you really can take a bow — for a triumph of democracy

By Richard Littlejohn for the Daily Mail
1 February 2020

Take a bow, Britain! That was the front page headline in this newspaper on June 25, 2016, celebrating the result of the EU referendum. It was triumphant, but also cathartic. A clear majority had voted Leave.

We were entitled to congratulate the British people on their fortitude in resisting the threats and embellishments of Project Fear. For years the Daily Mail had demanded that voters should be given the final say on our future relationship with Europe.

Now the people had spoken and delivered an emphatic verdict.

Surely this would draw a line under decades of division over the issue. As a committed opponent of the EU and all its works, I was elated when the result was announced.

My jubilation was, however, tinged with disbelief and trepidation over how the fanatically pro-Brussels political and business Establishment would react to the failure of their best efforts to batter the British people into submission.


Pro-Brexit supporters pose for photos as they take part in the final leg of the "March to Leave" in London, Friday, March 29, 2019



Supporters of the Leave campaign celebrate at the Leave.EU referendum party in London, Britain, June 2016

Throughout the campaign, the superior, well-funded forces of Remain appeared to be dominant. We were warned that if we had the audacity to vote Leave, the country faced ruin. Millions of jobs would be lost, pensions were at risk, the NHS would collapse.

The then President of the United States, Barack Obama, was wheeled out to warn that we would be consigned to the back of the queue when it came to transatlantic trade deals.

Yet still the majority of voters refused to be cowed.

It soon became apparent that our moment of triumph would be fleeting. Remain refused to accept defeat and, as I predicted here in the immediate aftermath of the referendum, would move heaven and earth in their determination to overturn the result.

Ultimately, their resistance was to end in failure. But as we prepare to leave the EU at 11pm tonight, it is worth reflecting on how we got here.

Throughout my journalistic career, which began in 1971, the issue of Europe has never been far from the surface.

The following year, Tory Prime Minister Edward Heath achieved his ambition of dragging us into what was then called the Common Market, after agreeing a shabby deal sacrificing our traditional fishing waters on the altar of European integration.

It was a close-run thing. The Bill paving the way for our membership scraped through the Commons by just eight votes.

Still, out in the country most people accepted it. Even many of those who had reservations about giving up — sorry, 'pooling' — our sovereignty could see a certain logic in joining.


Leader of the Brexit Party since 2019, and Member of the European Parliament (MEP) for South East England, Nigel Farage talks with supporters after his last speech during a session of the European Parliament on January 29

At the time, Britain was viewed as the Sick Man Of Europe, riven by strikes, low productivity and crippling debt. There was also a growing fascination with what we used to call 'The Continent', which seemed to be recovering from the ravages of World War II rather better than we were. This was the era of cheap package holidays to the Costas, of sex, sea and sangria and Y Viva Espana!

Modern Europe looked like a land of milk and honey, spaghetti bolognese, cut-prize booze and a lucrative captive market for British exports. Membership of the Common Market would be our economic salvation.

Bonnet de douche. This time next year, Rodney . . .

Of course, it wouldn't turn out that way. The 1973 oil price crisis sent the world economy into a tailspin. We should have realised that even a European protectionist bloc wasn't immune to global forces.

Today, hostility towards Europe has been presented as a purely Conservative phenomenon. It was in order to heal those divisions once and for all that David Cameron called the 2016 referendum in the first place.

But back then it was Labour tearing itself apart over the issue. Which is why then Prime Minister Harold Wilson held his own referendum on membership in 1975.

Even in the Seventies families were divided, often along generational lines. My father, who worked for a company which manufactured diesel engines, voted In. He was used to dealing with European suppliers and saw the benefits of staying in the club.

He also belonged to the generation that had fought in World War II and genuinely believed that anything which brought the countries of Europe closer together would prevent such horrific slaughter from ever happening again.

Me, being a card-carrying member of the Awkward Squad with an aversion to any kind of authority — and big government, in particular — voted Out, a position I've held ever since.

But there was none of the bitterness that has characterised the past four years. Those of us who vehemently opposed membership respected the honourable motives of those in favour and quietly accepted the outcome of the referendum.

The campaign to quit the Common Market was dominated by the Labour Left, supported by maverick Tories such as Enoch Powell.

The Left saw it as a capitalist conspiracy, a bankers' ramp, forcing up food prices and forcing down wages. They weren't wrong, as it turned out.


Britain's Speaker of the House of Commons John Bercow makes some personal remarks to thank staff, members and family members in the House of Commons in London on October 30, 2019

Yet tired of political and economic turmoil, the British people took the quiet life option and voted by more than two-thirds to remain.

Labour conferences continued to play host to anti-European demonstrations, debates and fringe meetings. And when the party fell into the hands of the hard-Left, electing the eccentric Michael Foot — aka Worzel Gummidge — as leader, Labour fought the 1983 General Election on a commitment to take us out of Europe without so much as the inconvenience of a referendum.

That manifesto was dubbed the 'longest suicide note in history' and Labour was crushed. It was only after Margaret Thatcher's third victory in 1987 that Labour came to embrace the European dream.

The epiphany followed a speech by Jacques Delors, then president of the European Commission, to a trades union conference promising that Brussels would become a bulwark against Thatcherite conservatism, enshrining collective bargaining and workers' rights.

Meanwhile, an increasingly Euro-sceptical Mrs Thatcher was experiencing her own problems over Europe, which first came to a head when Michael Heseltine — a Tory conference darling — stormed out of the Cabinet in 1986.

He resigned over the fate of Britain's last helicopter manufacturer, Westland, which was in danger of going out of business. Thatcher wanted to sell it to the Americans, Hezza favoured a European takeover.

It was the start of an internecine war which would eventually see Thatcher herself deposed by Europhiles in 1990. Her successor John Major fared little better, running into stiff resistance when he forced through the Maastricht Treaty without a referendum.

Major lost all authority following the collapse of the pound on Black Wednesday in 1992 — from which he never recovered. Oh, yes.

I was presenting an afternoon show on LBC radio that day, and could only look on with astonishment as the business editor kept rushing manically into the studio to inform listeners that interest rates had gone through the roof, rising to an astronomical 15 per cent.

The government spent billions in a vain effort to keep sterling pegged to the ERM, forerunner of the euro single currency.

That was also the day a certain Nigel Farage, then a City trader, decided to resign from the Tory Party and dedicate his life to getting Britain out of the EU.

Farage's dream will come to fruition tonight, almost three decades later. The Brexit deal negotiated by Boris Johnson isn't perfect, but it secures our departure and gives us back control of our money, laws and borders.

OK, so we still have to agree a future trading relationship and already EU panjandrums such as Michel Barnier and that pipsqueak, soon-to-be-ex-Irish PM Lenny Verruca are shaping up tricky.

But I get the sense that their heart really isn't in it this time.

The Europeans need a deal more than we do and with a thumping 80-seat majority, Boris can always walk away — something the hapless Theresa May was never going to do. I'm not going to revisit the past four years in glorious Technicolor.

We've been living through a gruesome movie which we needn't replay. Project Fear has nowhere else to go. None, not a single one, of their doomsday predictions has come true.

The hardline Remainers have left the stage. That gurning gargoyle Bercow has been reduced to a circus act, touting for gigs on the after-dinner speaking circuit and demeaning himself on foreign TV shows.

Labour is an irrelevance and the Hammonds, Grieves, Soubrys and Gina Millers are little more than an historical footnote, an aberration best forgotten.

I must admit, though, at one stage, after Theresa May's Chequers debacle and with Speaker Bercow obviously hellbent on helping Remainers kill off Brexit altogether, I feared it might never happen. I've never been so pleased to be proven wrong.

With luck, future historians will look back at this period as a temporary bout of insanity, during which almost the entire political class suffered a collective nervous breakdown.

Some Continuity Remainers such as the ubiquitous Alastair Campbell and the ridiculous Andrew Adonis — neither of whom has ever been elected to anything — are still making petulant fools of themselves by refusing to handle the commemorative 50p coin. Ignore them.

Farage deserves his party in Parliament Square tonight and Boris has received his reward in spades, with a stunning election victory and five full years in Downing Street to look forward to.

Some people will never reconcile themselves to our leaving the EU, although I'd be astonished if we see the exodus they were threatening.

Despite the abuse and vilification we Leavers have had to endure, we should resist the temptation to gloat or seek reprisals.

The past four years have been like a series of heavyweight boxing championship contests. The first match was a narrow win on points, the last a knockout in the 15th round. Both boxers have fought themselves to a standstill. It's time for a final, sporting embrace.

The gouging and below-the-belt punches must be forgotten.

This is a moment for magnanimity, not retribution. Outside the metropolitan dinner party circles of recalcitrant, unreconciled Remoaners, who commandeered the EU referendum campaign to prosecute their culture war and flaunt their imaginary moral superiority, I don't detect any widespread appetite for resuming hostilities.

Even during the campaign, all of the demented, deeply entrenched bitterness seemed to be confined largely to Parliament Square, the House of Commons and the TV studios on College Green.

I have friends who voted Remain and can honestly say I haven't fallen out with any of them. If arguments over Europe have destroyed friendships and broken up marriages, then I can only conclude that those relationships must have been pretty fragile to begin with.

My sense is that most people accept the result of the General Election as drawing a line in the sand, however they voted. And, as they say in psychobabble circles, we must 'move on'.

Voters in Northern and Midlands seats who returned Tory MPs, some for the first time, have set us an admirable precedent.

If residents of former pit villages and rust belt ex-factory towns can forgive and forget their past animosity towards the Tories and send an Old Etonian back to No 10 with an unassailable majority, then surely Leavers and Remainers should have little difficulty settling their differences.

We have come together as one nation before, most notably after the Civil War. It's what has forged our resilience as a proud, independent democracy.

That's what is really at the heart of all this. We are once again masters of our own destiny. And that bestows the right to make the wrong decision. Not to say we won't make mistakes.

For instance, I think the decision to allow the Chinese to help build our 5G comms network is a colossal blunder. But it's the Prime Minister's prerogative and he will have no one to blame if it all goes pear-shaped.

In backing Huawei, Boris has demonstrated that he will only ever act in what he perceives as Britain's national interest.

Contrary to many expectations, he has shown that Britain is not America's poodle. And judging by the mollifying noises coming out of Trump's national security adviser Mike Pompeo yesterday, the U.S. respects that decision, no matter how much it dislikes it.

After losing four Prime Ministers — Thatcher, Major, Cameron and May — over Europe, the Conservatives are now united. They don't want to lose another.

We can look forward, fingers crossed, to five years of stability. Our future is in our own hands. With a fair wind, we can forge ahead to a glorious global future.

For that we must thank politicians such as Farage and Boris, who put their lives on hold and their careers on the line in pursuit of our freedom.

Farage deserves our gratitude for the crucial role he played in getting us out. He also deserves a knighthood. But much as I like and admire him, he was never going to be the man to bring Britain together.

Boris has that rare gift. Like Arnold Bennett's character, The Card, he possesses the ability to cheer us all up. Heaven knows we could all do with cheering up after the turmoil and rancour of the past four years.

But in the final analysis, this isn't a triumph for any one or other politician. It is a triumph for democracy, for the determination of the British people to assert their sovereignty at the ballot box.

Take a bow, Britain!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/...OHN-Britain-really-bow-triumph-democracy.html
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,808
1,890
113

As the panicked EU goes into Brexit meltdown, Britain finally has the upper hand


SHERELLE JACOBS
DAILY TELEGRAPH COLUMNIST
DAILY TELEGRAPH
7 FEBRUARY 2020


Brussels knows that its chance to flog Britain the worst trade deal in history is slipping away CREDIT: FRANCOIS LENOIR/ REUTERS

The EU is scoffing with panic. This week, its leaders neurotically laughed off the threat of a Parliament shutdown, as bureaucrats slammed their fists over post-Brexit budget cuts. Press officers tuttingly buried an economic report warning that Brexit will rock bloc economies. But they struggled to firefight raging speculation as to who might follow Britain out the door. As rumours rumbled of an Italexit debt crisis, Marine Le Pen thundered that a global Eurosceptic movement has infiltrated Brussels.

Perhaps the most intriguing development this week, however, is Michel Barnier’s shift in persona. Mere months ago, Mr Barnier was gloomily instructing Britain to sign up to vassalage. Lecture highlights included “why Britain must take responsibility” (by becoming an EU satellite state) and why “choices” (for example liberty) must have “consequences”. But suddenly, the school master has a snake oil salesman. His arid presentations on Britain’s self-inflicted fate have morphed into buttery pitches for “a best in class free trade agreement”.

Such a “best in class” deal could be otherwise described as Theresa Mayite vassalage. It entails sucking Britain into megalomaniac defence projects, allowing Brussels to plunder Britain’s fishing waters, and blessing Britain with freedom for the small price of sacrificing its competitiveness. This “exceptional offer” is being gift-wrapped free of charge in the tangled red ribbons of state aid paperwork and taxation regulations. Available for a limited time only (expires Dec 2020).

In reality, though Brussels knows that its chance to flog Britain the worst trade deal in history is slipping away. It can no longer fall back on the backstop to keep us locked in Hotel California. Boris Johnson’s thumping majority also means Britain’s "no deal" bargaining chip is back in play: a WTO Brexit would pass through Parliament reasonably comfortably. Revelations this week that, in the event of no deal, Japanese car giant Nissan would consider doubling down on the UK to boost its domestic market share, and protect its Sunderland plant, underline the inconvenient truth: Project Fear premonitions are overblown, and Britain could cope perfectly well without a trade deal.

It is also becoming embarrassingly clear that the EU has no actual strategy. Only the clapped out choreography of a collapsing robo-bureaucracy. The most tedious of its “secret moves” is sequencing. Granted, this was how Brussels tripped up that lurching political equivalent to two left feet, Theresa May. She sealed her fate when she foolishly agreed to settle Northern Ireland before penning a divorce settlement.

But the idea that Boris Johnson’s government would fall for this again is laughable. Still the EU tries its luck: this week Mr Barnier said that before signing up to a trade deal, Britain would have to agree to the EU’s conditions - effectively trying to turn fishing and Gibraltar into the new Irish Border.

Another of the EU’s recycled moves is heel dragging. It intends to bog Britain down with absurd and nonsensically disparate demands until the deadline is near. The idea being that Boris Johnson will feel political pressure to avoid breaking his promise to settle Brexit by the end of the year - and thus sign up to a dud deal.

Britain’s counter-move is already evident - to negotiate trade deals with the United States and other countries, as talks with Brussels flounder; Cummings and co are determined to send out the message that if the EU does not want to engage in talks then that it can go jogging.

Indeed, Trade Secretary Liz Truss announced on Thursday that Britain is seeking huge reductions in tariffs from a trade deal with the United States. The Government also intends to begin negotiations with Japan, Australia and New Zealand in the coming months.

And so the EU gets more and more desperate. In a stumbling tribute to Orwellian doublespeak, its most ridiculous new wheeze is semantic. It is genuinely trying to get Britain to accidentally enslave itself by changing the meaning of basic words.

This includes the preposition “In”. Britain has rejected staying “in” the single market, with all the accompanying constrictions and conditions. Brussels’ solution? Offer “access” to the single market, with all the accompanying constrictions and conditions.

Then there is the oldest trick of the bureaucratic sociopath: the unflinching lie. My favourite peddled by the EU this week is that free movement must continue as the condition for any trade deal. Even though the EU has, in the Political Declaration, conceded the precise contrary.

It is increasingly clear that Brussels is the new Theresa May of these negotiations. And it is finally heading for a rude awakening.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politic...exit-meltdown-britain-finally-has-upper-hand/
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,454
8,068
113
B.C.

As the panicked EU goes into Brexit meltdown, Britain finally has the upper hand


SHERELLE JACOBS
DAILY TELEGRAPH COLUMNIST
DAILY TELEGRAPH
7 FEBRUARY 2020


Brussels knows that its chance to flog Britain the worst trade deal in history is slipping away CREDIT: FRANCOIS LENOIR/ REUTERS

The EU is scoffing with panic. This week, its leaders neurotically laughed off the threat of a Parliament shutdown, as bureaucrats slammed their fists over post-Brexit budget cuts. Press officers tuttingly buried an economic report warning that Brexit will rock bloc economies. But they struggled to firefight raging speculation as to who might follow Britain out the door. As rumours rumbled of an Italexit debt crisis, Marine Le Pen thundered that a global Eurosceptic movement has infiltrated Brussels.

Perhaps the most intriguing development this week, however, is Michel Barnier’s shift in persona. Mere months ago, Mr Barnier was gloomily instructing Britain to sign up to vassalage. Lecture highlights included “why Britain must take responsibility” (by becoming an EU satellite state) and why “choices” (for example liberty) must have “consequences”. But suddenly, the school master has a snake oil salesman. His arid presentations on Britain’s self-inflicted fate have morphed into buttery pitches for “a best in class free trade agreement”.

Such a “best in class” deal could be otherwise described as Theresa Mayite vassalage. It entails sucking Britain into megalomaniac defence projects, allowing Brussels to plunder Britain’s fishing waters, and blessing Britain with freedom for the small price of sacrificing its competitiveness. This “exceptional offer” is being gift-wrapped free of charge in the tangled red ribbons of state aid paperwork and taxation regulations. Available for a limited time only (expires Dec 2020).

In reality, though Brussels knows that its chance to flog Britain the worst trade deal in history is slipping away. It can no longer fall back on the backstop to keep us locked in Hotel California. Boris Johnson’s thumping majority also means Britain’s "no deal" bargaining chip is back in play: a WTO Brexit would pass through Parliament reasonably comfortably. Revelations this week that, in the event of no deal, Japanese car giant Nissan would consider doubling down on the UK to boost its domestic market share, and protect its Sunderland plant, underline the inconvenient truth: Project Fear premonitions are overblown, and Britain could cope perfectly well without a trade deal.

It is also becoming embarrassingly clear that the EU has no actual strategy. Only the clapped out choreography of a collapsing robo-bureaucracy. The most tedious of its “secret moves” is sequencing. Granted, this was how Brussels tripped up that lurching political equivalent to two left feet, Theresa May. She sealed her fate when she foolishly agreed to settle Northern Ireland before penning a divorce settlement.

But the idea that Boris Johnson’s government would fall for this again is laughable. Still the EU tries its luck: this week Mr Barnier said that before signing up to a trade deal, Britain would have to agree to the EU’s conditions - effectively trying to turn fishing and Gibraltar into the new Irish Border.

Another of the EU’s recycled moves is heel dragging. It intends to bog Britain down with absurd and nonsensically disparate demands until the deadline is near. The idea being that Boris Johnson will feel political pressure to avoid breaking his promise to settle Brexit by the end of the year - and thus sign up to a dud deal.

Britain’s counter-move is already evident - to negotiate trade deals with the United States and other countries, as talks with Brussels flounder; Cummings and co are determined to send out the message that if the EU does not want to engage in talks then that it can go jogging.

Indeed, Trade Secretary Liz Truss announced on Thursday that Britain is seeking huge reductions in tariffs from a trade deal with the United States. The Government also intends to begin negotiations with Japan, Australia and New Zealand in the coming months.

And so the EU gets more and more desperate. In a stumbling tribute to Orwellian doublespeak, its most ridiculous new wheeze is semantic. It is genuinely trying to get Britain to accidentally enslave itself by changing the meaning of basic words.

This includes the preposition “In”. Britain has rejected staying “in” the single market, with all the accompanying constrictions and conditions. Brussels’ solution? Offer “access” to the single market, with all the accompanying constrictions and conditions.

Then there is the oldest trick of the bureaucratic sociopath: the unflinching lie. My favourite peddled by the EU this week is that free movement must continue as the condition for any trade deal. Even though the EU has, in the Political Declaration, conceded the precise contrary.

It is increasingly clear that Brussels is the new Theresa May of these negotiations. And it is finally heading for a rude awakening.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politic...exit-meltdown-britain-finally-has-upper-hand/
Amazing ! Hasn’t Great Britain collapsed yet ?
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,808
1,890
113
Amazing ! Hasn’t Great Britain collapsed yet ?

Funnily enough, walking around town earlier I saw loads of people walking around getting on with their lives. I've not noticed any ill effects of Brexit.
 

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
76
Eagle Creek
I don't.


But that's not the point.


The point is, some obviously do.


Also, almost all of Scotland voted to stay in the EU.


If they wish to break from the UK now to stay in the EU, that should be their choice, should it not?

Democracy and all that at work.
You are right. It is their choice - short-sighted as it is - to leave the UK. No matter that they lack the ability to stand on their own considering the only reason they are barely staying afloat economically is due to the funding provided by Britain now that they are no longer getting money from the EU. I'm sure Britain could put those funds to much better use than propping up a failing Scot economy. So, let them go.