Boris prorogues Parliament and visits the Queen to kickstart election campaign

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
50,135
1,925
113
The 2019 General Election campaign has officially begun with Parliament prorogued and Johnson visiting the Queen today at Buckingham Palace...

General election 2019: Official campaign begins after PM meets Queen

BBC News
6 November 2019


Boris Johnson spent about 20 minutes at Buckingham Palace

Boris Johnson will launch the Conservative election campaign later, promising to "get Brexit done".

The prime minister has met the Queen at Buckingham Palace, marking the official start of the election period in the run-up to the 12 December poll.

He will make a statement before addressing his first rally of the five-week campaign.

Jeremy Corbyn has said Labour is "well prepared and utterly determined" to win power to "transform" the country.

In a speech in Telford, he said recent comments by Tory candidates about the Grenfell tragedy were "shameful" and suggested his opponents felt there were "above us all".

Elsewhere, as the starting pistol is fired on five weeks of official campaigning:

The Green Party has launched its campaign with a promise to invest £100bn a year on climate action
The Liberal Democrats have pledged to spend £2.2bn a year on mental health services, funded by a 1% rise to income tax
Tory MP Andrew Bridgen has apologised "unreservedly" for comments about the Grenfell Fire Tragedy
A senior Welsh Conservative says it looks "very difficult" for Alun Cairns to lead the party's election campaign in Wales after his former aide "sabotaged" a rape trial.
Labour's ruling body meets to discuss whether Chris Williamson and Keith Vaz can stand as candidates

Tory Party chairman James Cleverly has defended the conduct of the party's campaign so far after two Conservatives were forced to apologise for comments about the Grenfell tragedy and the party was accused of "doctoring" a video of Labour's Sir Keir Starmer talking about Brexit.

Mr Cleverly said Jacob Rees Mogg and Andrew Bridgen's remarks about the actions of Grenfell victims had "caused hurt and distress", telling BBC Breakfast "we don't always get things right and when we get it wrong we apologise".

However, he insisted the Starmer video - which has been described as "inexplicable" by one of his own MPs Johnny Mercer - was "obviously light-hearted" and would not be removed.

Writing in the Daily Telegraph to mark the start of the Conservative campaign, Mr Johnson likened the UK to a "supercar blocked in the traffic" by Brexit, adding: "If we can get Brexit done, there are hundreds of billions of pounds of investment that are just waiting to flood into this country."

He said those in Labour "point their fingers" at the rich "with a relish and a vindictiveness not seen since Stalin persecuted the kulaks" - wealthier peasants during the Russian Revolution, many of whom were murdered or starved to death.

And he repeated his claim that as well as another referendum on Brexit, a Labour government would also lead to a second vote on Scottish independence.

'No choice'



In the Daily Telegraph, Mr Johnson compared his opponent Mr Corbyn to Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin.

Mr Johnson said he did not want the election, but "we simply have no choice".

"There is only one way to get Brexit done, and I am afraid the answer is to ask the people to change this blockading Parliament."

Mr Johnson added: "It's time to change the dismal pattern of the last three years and to get out of our rut."

"The choice is clear. We can either go with Corbyn and his two favourite advisers, Dither and Delay... Or else we can vote for a sensible and moderate One Nation Conservative government".

Mr Johnson said that as well as another referendum on Brexit, a Labour government would also lead to a second vote on Scottish independence.

Mr Corbyn has previously said a new Scottish independence referendum was not "desirable or necessary" - but the SNP's Nicola Sturgeon said she believed Labour would give the go-ahead for one if in government.

At his own campaign event, Mr Corbyn said he would be a "very different kind of prime minister" who "only seeks power in order to share power".

He said the election was a once-in-a-generation chance to "tear down the barriers that are holding people back" and to "rebuild" the NHS, schools and the police force.

But former Labour foreign secretary Jack Straw has suggested a Corbyn victory could have a detrimental effect on the UK's national security.

He told the Times other countries could "lessen intelligence co-operation" with the UK if Mr Corbyn - a long-time critic of US foreign policy - made it to Downing Street.

Shadow home secretary Diane Abbott told the BBC that long-standing intelligence arrangements would continue as the UK's security services, including MI5, understood "democracy depends on supporting the government of the day".

On Tuesday, the Liberal Democrats launched their campaign, with leader Jo Swinson saying the election could be a "a moment for seismic change" when "a new and different politics" emerges.

Short session of Parliament: How does it compare?



The 19-day session of Parliament this year is the shortest since October 1948, when MPs sat for just 10 days.

That session was called purely as part of efforts to amend the Parliament Act to reduce the powers of the House of Lords.

In February 1974, MPs sat for 60 days before Edward Heath's Conservative government called a snap general election.

A 1922 session of Parliament lasted only 17 days, as MPs met to pass legislation to approve the Irish Free State.

A year earlier, there was a four-day session purely to approve the Anglo-Irish Treaty.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2019-50311003
 

Serryah

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 3, 2008
10,981
2,789
113
New Brunswick
So when will the outrage come since BoJo did NOT give Brexit on 31st October and instead holding an election?
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
50,135
1,925
113
So when will the outrage come since BoJo did NOT give Brexit on 31st October and instead holding an election?

It wont. He'll win in a landslide.

You're out of touch, like most Remoaners.
 

Serryah

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 3, 2008
10,981
2,789
113
New Brunswick
It wont. He'll win in a landslide.

You're out of touch, like most Remoaners.


Actually not a "Remoaner".


I think that had things with the initial question not been so divided, it was good the UK leaves the EU if it felt it no longer got benefit from it.


As for winning in a landslide; we'll see. People are NOT happy about having an election, and not happy that he lied about leaving the EU. It may come back to bite him in the arse.
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
The last time Boris and the Queen did this it turned out to be completely illegal.

Hopefully they will both be more closely supervised this time.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
50,135
1,925
113
Actually not a "Remoaner".

I think that had things with the initial question not been so divided, it was good the UK leaves the EU if it felt it no longer got benefit from it.

You mean "Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?"?

That sort of divided, you mean?

As for winning in a landslide; we'll see.




People are NOT happy about having an election


Remainer MPs aren't. Most are MPs of Leave constituencies, so they are shitscared of facing the wrath of their constituents.
 
Last edited:

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
50,135
1,925
113
The last time Boris and the Queen did this it turned out to be completely illegal.
Hopefully they will both be more closely supervised this time.

You think Parliament should still be sitting during an election?

And Boris's proroguing of Parliament was deemed perfectly legal by the High Court and only became illegal when the Supreme Court changed English Common Law to make it so.
 
Last edited:

Serryah

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 3, 2008
10,981
2,789
113
New Brunswick
You mean "Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?"?

That sort of divided, you mean?


If only the original question had been so simple. Sadly, both sides skrewed the pooch on that.









Remainer MPs aren't. Most are MPs of Leave constituencies, so they are shitscared of facing the wrath of their constituents.


From what I've seen, most people period don't want an election but figures you'd ignore the will of the people.
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
it shows the lengths the brexiteers will go to to avoid a second referendum
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Sad to say but the UK is looking more fukked up than Lebanon, the place where the leader (who also just resigned) happens to be a Saudi who has business worth billion there yet in the country he is running (for France) is a shit-hole that gets attacked by Israel on a daily basis. The repairs from the last month long bombing campaign has still not been repair if you have any doubts who he really works for.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
it shows the lengths the brexiteers will go to to avoid a second referendum
They should go and talk to Assad to see how you keep a country together when minions are trying to undermine 'the people's Government'.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
If only the original question had been so simple. Sadly, both sides skrewed the pooch on that.


From what I've seen, most people period don't want an election but figures you'd ignore the will of the people.
When was the last time the Government did something good for 'the people'. In 1290 they kicked out the Jewish Bankers for 350 years. Did it make a difference (before they were able to move back in), ask the resident expert(s) what the place was like from 1300-1500. Granted the Black Death 50 years later would have put a damper on any big celebrations. The talk says it was as false as 9/11 when all the facts are looked at.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
50,135
1,925
113
If only the original question had been so simple. Sadly, both sides skrewed the pooch on that.

The referendum question WAS simlple.

The question was: "Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?"

It can hardly be much simpler. You'd have to be pretty stupid to look at the question and get confused as to what it's asking.

The question was approved by the Electoral Commission before it was put into the referendum.

This is how the Electoral Commission assessed the question and what it found:

How we assessed the proposed referendum question

We looked at the proposed question from the perspective of voters. We wanted to see if it was written in a way that voters could easily understand and answer.

As well as looking at the question ourselves, we gathered evidence to help us with our assessment. This included:


  • carrying out research with voters from different backgrounds and across different areas, through focus groups and one to one interviews
  • asking for advice from experts on accessibility and plain language
  • talking to potential campaign groups, other interested groups and individuals, including political parties who may want to campaign at the referendum


What we found

We found that the question was written in plain language and was easy for people to understand and answer.

From what I've seen, most people period don't want an election but figures you'd ignore the will of the people.
Are you really, in all seriousness, saying that there shouldn't be a General Election if most people don't want one? I'm afriad that's not how things work in democracies. Elections have to be - and are - regularly held in democracies whether most people don't want one or not. And in Britain you aren't forced to vote. Anyone who doesn't want there to be an election just doesn't have to vote.

You're wrong anyway in saying most people don't want a General Election. A poll released on 2nd November showed 56% of people want the election, 28% are opposed to it, with 16% saying "Don't Know".

And not long ago there were people on here saying Boris should hold a General Election because he doesn't have a mandate from the people. But now he's holding one, we now have people complaining that he's holding one. He can't win either way, it seems.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
50,135
1,925
113
it shows the lengths the brexiteers will go to to avoid a second referendum

MPs voted by 334 to 85 against holding an undemocratic second referendum back in March, you moron.

The people were also told before the referendum that it's a "once in a generation decision" and that the "government will implement hat you decide." So I'd actually quite like to see that referendum promise honoured.

 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
50,135
1,925
113
STEPHEN GLOVER: Why I fear the Boris Bashing Corporation may sway the most critical election since the War

By Stephen Glover for the Daily Mail
6 November 2019

Despite everything that has been said about the supposed prevalence of social media during the election campaign, the BBC remains by far the major source of news for most people.

According to media watchdog Ofcom, BBC1 is the most used source of news for a sizeable 58 per cent of the population. The BBC’s website is consulted by 25 per cent of people for news, while 23 per cent turn to the Corporation’s news channel.

Meanwhile, the Beeb has a dominant position on radio. Its stations are listened to by 72 per cent of people who get their news from what used to be known as the wireless.


Presenter Nick Robinson on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme yesterday delivered a sententious lecture to listeners about the importance of the ‘attitudes and values’ of political parties — implying the Tories had come unstuck big time


By contrast, the overall reach of printed newspapers is significantly less than 20 years ago, though newspaper websites have partly compensated for the decline.

Although I don’t at all discount the influential new role of social media such as Facebook and Twitter, the BBC is probably as powerful as ever and, because of the relative decline of newspapers, arguably more so.

With extra power goes extra responsibility, and it’s my contention that in recent days our national broadcaster has shown a worrying lack of balance.


If you relied on the BBC for news, you probably wouldn’t know that Zarah Sultana, the party’s candidate for Coventry South, wrote in an online post in 2015 that she would ‘celebrate’ the deaths of Tony Blair and Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu. The BBC reported this fleetingly. (She has since apologised)

It has dwelt obsessively on Tory mistakes and cock-ups while tending to ignore serious Labour failings.

Of course, I don’t deny that the Conservatives have contrived to shoot themselves in the foot on several occasions, nor that the BBC was absolutely right to report these self-inflicted wounds.

I obviously make no complaint about the coverage given to the tribulations of Welsh Secretary Alun Cairns, who resigned yesterday over allegations surrounding a former aide ‘sabotaging’ a rape trial.

Nor do I grumble about the thousands of words devoted to the idiocy of Jacob Rees-Mogg. What impelled him to suggest that the victims of the Grenfell Tower conflagration should have used ‘common sense’, God alone knows.

If I were not a peace-loving man, I would derive huge enjoyment from throwing a custard pie at him. He has affected a lofty and supercilious air that might have even ruffled feathers in the 18th century.

So no objections on this score, though I could have done without the sermonising that accompanied the reporting of these two men’s errors.


Sky News’s Kay Burley was so frustrated yesterday at not having a senior Tory to interview that she berated an empty chair, and mockingly told it all the searching questions she would have asked if Tory chairman James Cleverly had been sitting in it


For example, presenter Nick Robinson on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme yesterday delivered a sententious lecture to listeners about the importance of the ‘attitudes and values’ of political parties — implying the Tories had come unstuck big time.

Where I think Auntie got badly carried away was over her hysterical response to the selective editing of a TV clip by Tory propagandists which made Labour’s Sir Keir Starmer look comically indecisive over Brexit.

The live interview made him look hopelessly confused, so it’s a mystery why the Tories thought they needed to tinker with it.

But did their sleight of hand deserve so much BBC outrage? The pro-Labour Guardian and Daily Mirror dealt with it calmly and briefly.

But my grouse is not really over the way in which the Beeb evidently relished reporting Tory misfortunes at such length. No, what has been shameful is the manner in which it has virtually turned a blind eye to Labour excesses.


It was a joy to hear veteran broadcaster David Dimbleby talk calmly and reasonably on BBC radio yesterday about last night’s edition of Panorama on BBC1, introduced by him, on the divisions caused by Brexit

If you relied on the BBC for news, you probably wouldn’t know that Zarah Sultana, the party’s candidate for Coventry South, wrote in an online post in 2015 that she would ‘celebrate’ the deaths of Tony Blair and Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu. The BBC reported this fleetingly. (She has since apologised.)

Nor has it shown much interest in the past online anti-Semitic reflections of Ali Milani, Labour’s candidate for Uxbridge, the PM’s constituency. Mr Milani has used the hashtag ‘Jew’ and ‘Zionist’ as an insult in messages, though he has recently apologised.

And yet while the BBC almost ignored these disquieting revelations, it has told us countless times that Francesca O’Brien, the Tory candidate for Gower, wrote on Facebook in 2014 that people on the reality television show Benefits Street needed ‘putting down’. (Ms O’Brien has since apologised.)


It is the BBC — so much bigger than every other outlet, and also our national broadcaster — in which we rest the highest hopes that it will strive to avoid partiality. How often we are disappointed!


What a nasty thing to say. But it was, so far as we know, a one-off piece of stupidity, whereas Ali Milani, for example, was guilty over a longer period of more insidious views, which are widespread in Jeremy Corbyn’s party. Hardly even-handed of the BBC.

Let me give two more examples of its recent indulgence of Labour. During yesterday’s Today programme, which waxed so indignant over Tory failings, it was only parenthetically mentioned that former Labour Foreign Secretary Jack Straw had suggested Britain’s allies might regard Mr Corbyn in Downing Street as a national security threat.

Also, while making such a hullaballoo over No 10’s thwarted attempt to publish an official costing of Labour spending promises, the BBC didn’t think to investigate whether these pledges could turn out to be ruinous. Easier to pick on the Tories.

The BBC was admirably (and, to me, surprisingly) balanced during the 2016 EU referendum. So why has it reverted to type, and become the Bash Boris Corporation?

I doubt it is over-run with Corbynistas, though I imagine there are quite a lot of them. I suspect an innate anti-Toryism has been boosted by the Remainer sentiment and Boris Johnson loathing that are ubiquitous in fashionable circles.


Nor has it shown much interest in the past online anti-Semitic reflections of Ali Milani, Labour’s candidate for Uxbridge, the PM’s constituency. Mr Milani has used the hashtag ‘Jew’ and ‘Zionist’ as an insult in messages, though he has recently apologised


In their conscious minds, most BBC journalists do their best to resist such bias but, when Conservatives are on the ropes, a kind of group-think kicks in — and, as yesterday, we see the baleful consequences.

It’s not just the Beeb, of course. Other channels join the feeding frenzy.

Sky News’s Kay Burley was so frustrated yesterday at not having a senior Tory to interview that she berated an empty chair, and mockingly told it all the searching questions she would have asked if Tory chairman James Cleverly had been sitting in it.

By the way, Sky News’s political editor, Beth Rigby, would be wise to keep her views to herself. Last month she wrote a piece on the channel’s website inveighing against No Deal, and urged the PM to ‘put it in his election manifesto instead and let the people decide’.

But it is the BBC — so much bigger than every other outlet, and also our national broadcaster — in which we rest the highest hopes that it will strive to avoid partiality. How often we are disappointed!

Not always, though. It was a joy to hear veteran broadcaster David Dimbleby talk calmly and reasonably on BBC radio yesterday about last night’s edition of Panorama on BBC1, introduced by him, on the divisions caused by Brexit.

He said: ‘Everywhere there is this irritation, discontent and incomprehension about why Parliament hasn’t been able to implement what seemed to be a simple question in the referendum. It’s done terrible damage. It’s complicated, and people don’t like that.’

Will the BBC give Boris Johnson a fair run over the next five weeks? Will it examine the flaws and inconsistencies and evasions of Labour, the Lib Dems and the SNP with the same forensic scrutiny it brings to bear on the Tories?

If the answer to these questions is ‘No’, we are in even deeper trouble as a country than I thought.

This is the most momentous General Election since 1945, and it is categorically not the role of the British Broadcasting Corporation to try to sway the result.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/...-Boris-Bashing-Corporation-sway-election.html
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
50,135
1,925
113
Ian Austin, the Independent MP for Dudley North, quit the Labour Party in 2019. Here he is telling us why we should vote for the Conservative Party...

Coffee House

Ian Austin: patriotic Labour voters should back Boris Johnson

Ian Austin



Ian Austin
7 November 2019
The Spectator

The below is an edited transcript of Ian Austin’s remarks on BBC Radio 4 Today.

I only wanted to be a Labour MP. And I only ever really want to be the Labour MP for Dudley. It’s been such a huge privilege to do this job – a job I’ve loved, a place I love. But I’ve got to be honest with people: I’m not going to run in this election. The country faces a big choice. There’s only two people can be prime minister on December the 13th: Jeremy Corbyn or Boris Johnson. And I think Jeremy Corbyn is completely unfit to lead our country. Completely unfit to lead the Labour Party.

I joined the Labour Party as a teenager. I worked for the Labour Party in my 30s, I was a government adviser. In my 40s. I was an MP and a minister. So it has really come to something when I tell decent, traditional patriotic Labour voters that they should be voting for Boris Johnson at this election. I can’t believe it’s come to this, but that’s where we are.

I think this is the choice the country faces. The British people are going to decide this. Lots of Labour voters, traditional decent Labour voters are going to be grappling with this question. And if they’ve got to face up to that, then I don’t think people like me should have the luxury of running away from it. Look, I could just announce I’m standing down or disappear back to Dudley. You’d never hear from me again. But in the end, I think people who have put themselves forward for elected office, positions in politics, have a responsibility to stand up, tell the truth, do what’s right. And this happened on our watch, right? We have responsibility. What Jeremy Corbyn has done to the Labour Party, I don’t want him to be able to do to the country.

I think he’s spent his entire time in politics working with and defending all sorts of people: extremists and in some cases anti-Semites and terrorists… I think in the end: I don’t think he’s a patriot. I don’t think he loves his country. I think he always picks our country’s enemies, whether that’s the IRA during the Troubles or describing Hamas and Hezbollah as his friends or parroting Putin’s propaganda when the Russians send hitmen to murder people on the streets of Britain. But most shamefully of all, for a party that’s got a proud record of fighting for equality and opposing racism, the Labour Party has been poisoned with anti-Jewish racism under his leadership. And it is a complete and utter disgrace. It is a complete disgrace.

But look, of course, I’m not a Tory. This isn’t where I want to be. I just think that, I wouldn’t say Boris Johnson is unfit to be our prime minister in the way that I say that about Jeremy Corbyn. I think the country’s got a big choice to make. And I think Jeremy Corbyn is completely unfit to lead it.

The Labour Party has been my life. I can’t believe it’s come to this. But I have to tell the truth. I have to do what I think is right and it’s a really difficult decision… I could have kept it all quiet and gone along with it all or disappeared back off to Dudley. But I think you’ve got to stand up and tell the truth. I think you’ve got to stand up and tell the truth. If you’re not going to do what’s right on a fundamental question like racism, what are you going to do it on?

https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2019/11/ian-austin-patriotic-labour-voters-should-back-boris-johnson/
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
50,135
1,925
113


2019 General Election news

Liberal Democrats leader Jo Swinson caught lying on national TV, the Tories' bumpy start (and that of other parties) and the dirty tricks of the mainstream media

 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
50,135
1,925
113
'I'll take control of Britain's borders': Home Secretary Priti Patel to unveil a new points-based immigration system and 'NHS visa' to fast-track foreign doctors and nurses after Brexit



The proposal is part of Tory plans for an Australian-style points system which will prioritise migrants with much-needed skills. Home Secretary Priti Patel will also warn that Labour's 'uncontrolled and unlimited' migration would put greater pressure on schools and hospitals after last week Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell said Labour wanted to see 'as much free movement as possible' after Brexit.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
50,135
1,925
113
Coffee House Steerpike

Listen: Labour candidate’s agonising interview

Steerpike





Jane Aitchison

When it was revealed this week that the Labour parliamentary candidate in Coventry South, Zarah Sultana, had previously said she would celebrate the deaths of Tony Blair and Benjamin Netanyahu, few would have thought to defend her comments. In fact the candidate herself apologised this week for the remarks she made in 2015.

One person though seemed to struggle with how best to respond to the past allegations today. Labour’s candidate in Pudsey, Jane Aitchison, was on 5Live today, and was asked by presenter Emma Barnett whether Sultana should be allowed to stand, after these comments had come to light. The prospective MP first pleaded ignorance, saying:

‘I think that needs to be looked at’ and ‘I don’t know the details of it’. Reminded though by Emma Barnett that she now had been told the details, Aitchison mounted an awkward defence of past social media use. But she rather came undone when asked by Barnett:
‘Well I am asking you a specific: do you think she should be able to stand for saying she should celebrate the deaths of Tony Blair and Benjamin Netanyahu? You’ve just gone through a selection process to be the candidate here.’
Which led to an excruciatingly long silence from the candidate, lasting for around 12 seconds, before she spoke again. Even more remarkably, the interview still managed to go downhill from there. Aitchison then appeared to defend the right of people to celebrate the deaths of others, saying:
‘People do celebrate deaths, sometimes, it’s not good is it? Is it really good to celebrate deaths? It’s not. But people do sometimes, because they feel strongly about whatever that person represented.’
Before appearing to compare Tony Blair and Benjamin Netanyahu to Hitler:
‘What I’m saying is that people, for instance… they celebrated the death of Hitler.’
Has she been taking tips from Ken Livingstone?

https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2019/11/listen-labour-candidates-agonising-interview/