Beijing Skyscraper Fire

talloola

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 14, 2006
19,576
113
63
Vancouver Island
Building seven wasn't hit by a plane but it still collapsed.

Don't find that surprising at all, can imagine the impact of the towers falling
and how that would have jolted everything around them, including the foundation of tower seven.
There is a common sense answer to those problems, it's pretty simple, one
doesn't have to have a degree in anything but a little intelligence and
maturity.
 

Scott Free

House Member
May 9, 2007
3,893
46
48
BC
one
doesn't have to have a degree in anything but a little intelligence and
maturity.

Too much hope and faith in that for me I'm afraid.

I've seen both maturity and intelligence fail where common sense and scepticism have prevailed.

The Beijing skyscraper should have fallen too. Now a real reason needs to be found why it didn't, if nothing else then, so the knowledge can be passed onto the architects in New York.
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
The Beijing skyscraper should have fallen too.

Please regale us with your massive amounts of scientific evidence to support that statement....OK maybe massive would be too strong of a word...I guess scientific evidence would also be out....Oh hell, just point us all in the direction of one of those nutbar conspiracy sites that make this claim so we can all have a good laugh.


Now a real reason needs to be found why it didn't

The reasons are well known and clear. You have chosen to disregard them.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
The Beijing skyscraper should have fallen too. Now a real reason needs to be found why it didn't, if nothing else then, so the knowledge can be passed onto the architects in New York.

Over and over people have pointed out reasons and the differences between but you want to believe in a conspiracy... you need to.

What's the point.
 

Zzarchov

House Member
Aug 28, 2006
4,600
100
63
go and read the thread....there were pools of molten metal in the basement weeks later.

Yes, molten metal isn't molten steel. You don't need to melt a solid to liquid to reduce its strength and durability.

The difference between rock hard (spoon bending) and fridge ice cream should tell you that.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Yes, molten metal isn't molten steel. You don't need to melt a solid to liquid to reduce its strength and durability.

The difference between rock hard (spoon bending) and fridge ice cream should tell you that.

Pointing out that fact Zzarch will be glazed over as they do whenever their theories fall flat.
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
View attachment 991

A picture of melted metal I picked up at one of our recent fire scenes. This was from a trailer that was beside a barn that burned. To my knowledge the barn was not brought down by the CIA or Bush. In fact, I'm quite sure that there were not even any Americans within 10 miles of the barn. That's not to say that there weren't any drones used...just because I didn't see them doesn't mean they weren't used. Maybe I should go and dig up the ground where the barn stood. There may be trillions in gold stored there.
 

Stretch

House Member
Feb 16, 2003
3,924
19
38
Australia
wtc7 didnt collapse, it was dropped in its own footprint. demolished......a demolition that was reported upto 20 mins b4 it was dropped.
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
wtc7 didnt collapse, it was dropped in its own footprint. demolished......a demolition that was reported upto 20 mins b4 it was dropped.

Perhaps it would help your cause if you didn't keep posting the same stuff that has been disproved over and over again. Try to come up with something new and fresh.
 

Stretch

House Member
Feb 16, 2003
3,924
19
38
Australia
Perhaps it would help your cause if you didn't keep posting the same stuff that has been disproved over and over again. Try to come up with something new and fresh.

I'd love to mate, got any info on wtc7 being hit by ....say, anything??