B.C. judge rules father guilty of “family violence” for calling trans son “she”

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,041
6,160
113
Twin Moose Creek
I think you are right for once (of course that would make Putz wrong as usual) but the Pensions are just returning our own money plus interest! Wise people can understand that!
CPP doesn't. You're welcome


Sure looks like you are wrong, how are you going to twist out of this? I know I wasn't following the conversation on what it really was about right Banana boy?
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Cannuck do you have a CPP or an Old age deduction on your paycheck? Don't have a paycheck? well that would explain why you don't know that CPP is employer and employee contributions payed by the employer 2:1 to the CPP fund. Old age is Gov. mandatory Pension which you will get.


T.M. The history is all printed out right here on the forum. Do you know anyone who pays wages and deducts for C.P.P. etc. for someone who spends working hours 24/7 writing nonsense and insulting sensible people?
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,041
6,160
113
Twin Moose Creek
T.M. The history is all printed out right here on the forum. Do you know anyone who pays wages and deducts for C.P.P. etc. for someone who spends working hours 24/7 writing nonsense and insulting sensible people?

That's true, I thought even Bottle depot might pay into CPP I could be wrong since it is user fee financed and Gov. sponsored :)
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,041
6,160
113
Twin Moose Creek
I'm sure it does to an idiot like you. The reality is though, that the assets held in the CPP fund are by themselves insufficient to pay for all future benefits

Not at present though it still has a large surplus, when they get all the borrowed money back from the Provinces it may sustain itself.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
That's true, I thought even Bottle depot might pay into CPP I could be wrong since it is user fee financed and Gov. sponsored :)


For what he's able to accomplish between posts, I would doubt there's much cash involved. They probably allow him a bottle of pop once or twice a day.
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
Nobody I know gets an employer contribution. Those days are long gone.
Read this and weep Mr. know-it-all


Under CPP and EI legislation, both the employer and the employee may be obligated to contribute to the CPP when the employee is in pensionable employment and to EI when the employee is in insurable employment. Employers make CPP contributions and pay EI premiums for each employee and deduct CPP contributions and EI premiums from amounts they pay their employees and remit these amounts to the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). For CPP contributions, the employer and employee portions are the same. For EI premiums, the employer portion is generally 1.4 times the employee portion.


Source: https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-ag...s-responsibilities-benefits-entitlements.html


Someone quote me cause I'm on his ignore list......He can't stand the truth!
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,041
6,160
113
Twin Moose Creek
Read this and weep Mr. know-it-all
Source: https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-ag...s-responsibilities-benefits-entitlements.html
Under CPP and EI legislation, both the employer and the employee may be obligated to contribute to the CPP when the employee is in pensionable employment and to EI when the employee is in insurable employment. Employers make CPP contributions and pay EI premiums for each employee and deduct CPP contributions and EI premiums from amounts they pay their employees and remit these amounts to the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). For CPP contributions, the employer and employee portions are the same. For EI premiums, the employer portion is generally 1.4 times the employee portion.
Someone quote me cause I'm on his ignore list......He can't stand the truth!

You bet and a few more should quote DaS as well to drive the point home ;)
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,041
6,160
113
Twin Moose Creek

Bwahahaha your so right from your article

The 9.9-per-cent contribution rate was fully phased in by 2003 and has not increased since then. According to projections carried out by the Office of the Chief Actuary, it would have been sufficient to fund the existing CPP benefits for at least the next 75 years.
The rate will start to rise again in 2019, but for a different reason. The CPP enhancements that were announced in 2016 will require higher funding. By law those new benefits have to be fully funded so as to avoid passing the costs along to the next generation.
So do current working-age Canadians need to worry about their CPP pensions? The short answer is no. Workers will definitely get a CPP pension. The ultimate cost of CPP pensions may end up being a little higher than what the chief actuary has estimated but it also might be a little lower. The factors that affect cost are the unemployment rate, immigration, the birth rate or and changes in life expectancy

All the twisting and turning to try to make believe you were right the link to your proof says you are absolutely wrong

I actually had that link open for proof to your ignorance but this was far better hahahahaha
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
I'm not sure what the main point of this thread is NOW. When I jumped in way back the point I made was (contrary to someone who thinks he knows better) that pensions including the C.P.P. and O.A.P. are in most instances a case of us getting our own money returned. For the terminally brain dead we made payments to these pensions on pay day by way of premiums and taxes. :)