Anyway, seriously, kids growning up is like social Ontogeny Recapitulates Phylogeny.
In the womb, humans go through stages of the embyo growning gills, and then scales, and then hair... the body recapitulating the evolution it took to get where we are.
After birth (my theory by the way, so if it's correct I want a scholarship in my name for other nit-wit science twits) the kids go through social-psychological development parraleling the development of austrolapithecine up to homo-sapiens.
i.e., At the age of four kids have brains the size of an Australopithicus Andrethalis, and they act like it, only with the advantage of language and parental supervision. If you're doing a paper on the behavior of Australopithicus Anthropalis, then watch a four year old, subtract the language and parental supervision, and imagine how they'd be.
From the age of 8-12, ontology recapitulates phylogonetic social development along the australopithicus-erganomaster/homo-habilis lines of loving to sleep in tents around a fire after a good day of chasing gophers with sticks. It must have been a wonderful time, when the climate had relativly stabalized... when everyone could actually be as an adult what we call a kid, and for that to be the way to survive against stupid animals... All you had to do was get up in the morning and run them down and kill them... then cook and eat them (speaking of cooking, what happened was a few got hypnotically attracted to fire which kept them away from leopards, and some others prefered the taste of cooked meat, so they didn't get worms, then they mated, and we came from them).
The tricky part is when kids hit the age of 12-...
Paleoanthropological evidence indicates it was a time when the climate did a mega-change and survival depended on getting along so extreemly that their societies seriously did to the death any girl who did not look pretty and any guy not cool.
*THAT* is the time of socio-psychological development I, as the greatest pencil-neck science geek of southern Alberta history, is thinking about something which I, humbly, feel is interesting.
What really bugged me as a teen at that age regardless of my imature development was getting kicked in the balls or getting punched in the stomach, therefore given how all males that age have about the same small flat bellies etc. imagine a sort of plastic-silicone shield covering the nuts and belly.. something indiscreet and fashinable by Quebequis and non of anybody's business if some bullies kick you in the nuts or belly and it doesn't break you down.
When one is 17 or 18, they toss it away and grow up.
`
Because.......? And it's not about 'singling out' gay bullying, because the schools themselves wouldn't be starting these clubs, these clubs are started by students.
Why shouldn't said students be able to start a club with the word 'gay' in it? I mean, they're gay, so why shouldn't the name of their club reflect that if they want it to?
`
Because the kids aren't grown up yet, and are not yet thinking beyond the level of that thing between Homo-Erectus and Homo-Neandertalis.