Which was when?
As you have allowed me to make the decision, let's set the time frame at when the IPCC, Gore and Suzuki bagn their respective campaigns to fleece the public.
Which was when?
As you have allowed me to make the decision, let's set the time frame at when the IPCC, Gore and Suzuki bagn their respective campaigns to fleece the public.
I've allowed you because it's your claim.
So now it's a conspiracy by these people....who else is involved?...is this your only fall back?
I know the science began in the late 1800th century...Not sure Gore was around then.
Btw, did you have a look at my video...it's a good one.
Why don't you save the conspiracy distraction for a little later when you'll really need it.
So, how about it. What is this compelling proof of AGW, particularly in the face that all of these mechanisms have been exemplified (in the extreme) in the distant past as well as variable fluctuations in the recent past (ie 20-30 years)?
In fact, perhaps you can shed some light on the issue as to why the lobbies faound it necessary to re-invent themselves through an alternate marketing campaign.
As far as Gore and the 1800's are concerned, you had your chance to set the time frame... Don't go moving the goal posts now that you've painted yourself into a corner.
I didn't look at the vid, this computer I am on has no sound.
I'll use it as many times as you mention Al Gore as the leader of climate science or Suzuki for that matter.
Is the planet not warming? What is the driver of this warming? I suppose you have links to the peer reviewed papers and a list of scientific societies that agree with this trend of warming and the causes.
Please show me, I'd love to see them.
Or....are all these individulas part of the scam?
Explain.
It's your claim, I'm trying to help you.
Your mentors have taught you their trade well... Too bad your entire position is baseless.
Warming and cooling on a cyclical basis.
The "driver" is nature (or natural) as has been evidenced over the millenia.
"Peer reviewed"... You mean like teh peer review at the CRU and climategate?
Part of the scam
You remember don't you?... Global warming conveniently morphs into "climate change" when it is determined that the incorrect predictions/projections were made by the aforementioned lobbies... In fact, I think that this was around the time that there was mass admissions of the frauds surrounding the pre-engineered climate models that supported the AGW claims.. If memory serves, they were peer reviewed too.
I don't need the help, but thanks anyways.
There you go again.
So are bankers involved in this vast conspiracy?
No, just some papers peer reviewed by real scientists....not Al Gore, not other red herrings.
Here is a massive list of papers on the subject....but I'm sure you already went through them all.
So the scientists have conspired with Gore, the IPCC and who knows who else?
Does it now?
The IPCC was established in 1988.....what does IPCC stand for again?
No problem.....gee it sure did get silent all of a sudden.
Yes, along with reverse vampires and the Rand Corp.
Real like Suzuki and Gore?
Probably the reverse vampires
Sorry about that... I pick away at this in between other stuff
Ohhhh, poor Avro.
Not so much fun when you get back what you're doing, eh?
Cheers... Enjoy the weekend, albeit it's quite cold (with all the global warming and all).
Not giving up.. Just waiting for something (anything) of substance from you
Funny I was waiting for you.
Global warming morphs into climate change.....BS.
Can't cite a single paper that suggests AGW is not real.
Can't refrain from using A Gore as some sort of smoking gun.
Can't explain what is driving warming.
Avoids everything I say that may be a wittle to difficult to explain.
Gotta go, I'll try to come back later if you'd like to continue, if not, have a good one.
If you get a chance when you get in front a decent computer have a peek at the video....you'd like it.
Cheers.
As you have allowed me to make the decision, let's set the time frame at when the IPCC, Gore and Suzuki bagn their respective campaigns to fleece the public.
That's a good idea.
Now of course, the onus is on you to prove when those three entities decided to fleece the public.
Let us know when you have something concrete.
Avro sure got quiet pretty quick