I'm still waiting for you to answer some questions I asked several posts ago.
I haven't made any claims mhz, I've asked questions. Questions you can't seem to answer and are now setting out to obfuscate the topic to avoid having to do so.
None of the trusses 'broke' or showed any signs of failing, just like the pictures in the report available on their website.
The first thing that occured to me when the stories about 9/11 were in the news was, "Which plane hit WTC7. It was a matter of counting, you see. 3 planes (allegedly) and 4 buildings didn't compute.
It only needs one mistake and I mentioned the one I spotted. The rest are googleable.
I do, you just prefer to ignore them. All I claimed lately was that steel isn't the only thing that changes color with temperature changes. Did you pick out from those pics I posted of molten substances which was steel, plastic, glass, or iron? Nope. You ignored the post.
Yup. Some would say that I am a housewife. I also have a background in science, I am a mother, a long-distance runner, a soccer player, tall, sometimes underweight, I have a husband that does welding, is an ex firefighter, heavy machine operator, rugby player, etc. What have you got? Google and an opinion?
Do you mean your fellow countrymen or the ones that read/watch their activities?
There is a simulation a few pages back that is quite detailed, done by some of your countrymen so it should be good stuff.
For making such a small hole most of the fuel would have stayed outside and I hope the canceled the renovations to the rest of the building or is that progressing as planned. Shame to see them do only one section.
They ever find the shafts to the engines?
Eagle, they can't answer any direct questions, well, directly. They can only parrot what they are told at their favourite tinfoil site.
*snorts* I suppose some view it that way. I think it's entertaining, kinda like the "Gong Show".
My fave so far is the one about steel pouring out from the building but it didn't fail.
So do I, which is why I stopped running around, sifting through scores of data CD's I have accumulated over the years, or repositories of archived data on the net. There just isn't any point in countering their babble with fact. You know why? Because they don't understand the material.
Can't argue with that math. Yet the simulation I posted that was put together with skills that are above mine or yours and it was a crash analysis software program rather that an artistic program, little points that that just seem to bounce off you, for one example. That isn't a real big deal to me until your view is classified as the 'intelligent' and my side of the coin is classified as a little beneath you. My background doesn't make me any more qualified to be more than a reader of stuff that interests you. The only proof I can offer as to my mechanical aptitude, in a test I took at a college my score was 99/99 and at that time it was the top score and I have been around mechanical things all my life. You mention right off the bat things, if you want to topple a building you take out a structural member, in the case of a tower you take out a corner at a low floor number that still allows for a whiplash effect at the top, and they would have went over sideways taking out even more buildings
In your pictures the color was coming from the material while it was under heating, the stuff running off the building would be similar to what color it retains after being taken away from the heat, glass becomes clear but taffy-like, most plastics have flames when in a molten state. In the building and your photo's the last one is the one I would choose as being most similar. The photo has some damage to the exterior and it would indicate the damage from the larger portions of the plane would have made most of the floors sag towards the portions destroyed by the plane. That would mean the molten material came from the left of where it was pouring out. That leaves the corner and earlier footage should show a 'raging fire' in the corner itself prior to it being out and only white smoke being visible. The temperature of those flames should also be able to be color coded against known examples.
You just discard the links anyway and my background that I just gave is enough to make me pursue some avenue of investigation that somebody closer to the issue has already gone down.
Eaglesmack, this is a prime example of DB's finest to offer. Nothing but simple vacuous insults.
