30 days to de-socialize Canada

DurkaDurka

Internet Lawyer
Mar 15, 2006
10,385
129
63
Toronto
"[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]DAY TWENTY-FIVE: Bankruptcy laws are repealed; debtors who refuse to pay their debts are treated as virtual thieves."

That would be awesome, how would you go about sending GM to jail or these mortage lenders lending to people who had no business getting a mortage in the first place?
[/FONT]
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
And who will be stopping everyone else from going into your pockets?



That's hot.
 

Trex

Electoral Member
Apr 4, 2007
917
31
28
Hither and yon
Isn't that what conservatives go to the voting booth for?


Lest we forget.

From 1993 to 2005 a minimum of $100 million of taxpayers dollars was stolen by the Liberal Party of Canada under John Chretien.
The taxpayers moneys was funneled into front companies(mainly advertizing agencies headquartered in Quebec).
The money then flowed back into private Liberal Party of Canada slush fund accounts.
Chretien (then the Prime Minister of Canada) did everything in his power to stall, obfuscate and outright kill any and all investigations into the series of massive thefts.
Police chiefs were threatened, Federal publication bans enforced, the media was threatened with Federal lawsuits, people were coerced, threatend and ultimately fired.
Sheila Frazer then Auditor General of Canada was under enormous pressure from the Prime Ministers office to shut up and walk away.
She stuck to her guns and firmly stated that over $100 million dollars was missing from Canadian accounts.

Prime Minister Chretien continued to fight any and all investigations tooth and nail.

When it became glaringly obvious to the entire population of Canada that the Government of Canada under Prime Minister John Chretien had commited a series of massive thefts the then Finanance Minister Paul Martin organized an internal coup(within the Liberal Party of Canada) and removed John Chretien from power.
Out of pure spite John Chretien then "**** the Liberal bed and pissed on the pillow" by changing national campaign funding rules in order to cripple the Liberal party and vastly assist the opposing Conservative Party of Canada.

Under then PM Paul Martin a criminal investigation was launched.
Everyone involved lawyered up, the advertising front companies evaporated.
Shredding became a round the clock team sport across Ontario and Quebec.
Two pitiful flunkies were found guilty of theft and went to jail.
One million of the $100 million was recovered.

No party in Canada will ever again be able to match the vast sums of misappropriated and outright stolen money achevied by the Liberal Party of Canada.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Lest we forget.

From 1993 to 2005 a minimum of $100 million of taxpayers dollars was stolen by the Liberal Party of Canada under John Chretien.
The taxpayers moneys was funneled into front companies(mainly advertizing agencies headquartered in Quebec).
The money then flowed back into private Liberal Party of Canada slush fund accounts.
Chretien (then the Prime Minister of Canada) did everything in his power to stall, obfuscate and outright kill any and all investigations into the series of massive thefts.
Police chiefs were threatened, Federal publication bans enforced, the media was threatened with Federal lawsuits, people were coerced, threatend and ultimately fired.
Sheila Frazer then Auditor General of Canada was under enormous pressure from the Prime Ministers office to shut up and walk away.
She stuck to her guns and firmly stated that over $100 million dollars was missing from Canadian accounts.

Prime Minister Chretien continued to fight any and all investigations tooth and nail.

When it became glaringly obvious to the entire population of Canada that the Government of Canada under Prime Minister John Chretien had commited a series of massive thefts the then Finanance Minister Paul Martin organized an internal coup(within the Liberal Party of Canada) and removed John Chretien from power.
Out of pure spite John Chretien then "**** the Liberal bed and pissed on the pillow" by changing national campaign funding rules in order to cripple the Liberal party and vastly assist the opposing Conservative Party of Canada.

Under then PM Paul Martin a criminal investigation was launched.
Everyone involved lawyered up, the advertising front companies evaporated.
Shredding became a round the clock team sport across Ontario and Quebec.
Two pitiful flunkies were found guilty of theft and went to jail.
One million of the $100 million was recovered.

No party in Canada will ever again be able to match the vast sums of misappropriated and outright stolen money achevied by the Liberal Party of Canada.

$100 million / 22 million = $4.55 per person.

I wouldn't give much of a second thought about it either.

Unless I was extremely cheap.

Or a conservative.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Lest we forget.

From 1993 to 2005 a minimum of $100 million of taxpayers dollars was stolen by the Liberal Party of Canada under John Chretien.
The taxpayers moneys was funneled into front companies(mainly advertizing agencies headquartered in Quebec).
The money then flowed back into private Liberal Party of Canada slush fund accounts.
Chretien (then the Prime Minister of Canada) did everything in his power to stall, obfuscate and outright kill any and all investigations into the series of massive thefts.
Police chiefs were threatened, Federal publication bans enforced, the media was threatened with Federal lawsuits, people were coerced, threatend and ultimately fired.
Sheila Frazer then Auditor General of Canada was under enormous pressure from the Prime Ministers office to shut up and walk away.
She stuck to her guns and firmly stated that over $100 million dollars was missing from Canadian accounts.

Prime Minister Chretien continued to fight any and all investigations tooth and nail.

When it became glaringly obvious to the entire population of Canada that the Government of Canada under Prime Minister John Chretien had commited a series of massive thefts the then Finanance Minister Paul Martin organized an internal coup(within the Liberal Party of Canada) and removed John Chretien from power.
Out of pure spite John Chretien then "**** the Liberal bed and pissed on the pillow" by changing national campaign funding rules in order to cripple the Liberal party and vastly assist the opposing Conservative Party of Canada.

Under then PM Paul Martin a criminal investigation was launched.
Everyone involved lawyered up, the advertising front companies evaporated.
Shredding became a round the clock team sport across Ontario and Quebec.
Two pitiful flunkies were found guilty of theft and went to jail.
One million of the $100 million was recovered.

No party in Canada will ever again be able to match the vast sums of misappropriated and outright stolen money achevied by the Liberal Party of Canada.

I'm not sure old Mulroney wasn't a pretty good thief himself- I think he even stole the light bulbs when he moved out of Sussex Drive. :smile:
 

Trex

Electoral Member
Apr 4, 2007
917
31
28
Hither and yon
$100 million / 22 million = $4.55 per person.

I wouldn't give much of a second thought about it either.

Unless I was extremely cheap.

Or a conservative.
Hmm.
So one of the biggest political thefts in the western world and certainly in Canadian history doesnt bother you?
Its only 4 or 5 bucks a head.
The biggest outright theft by a political party in Canadian history and you dont "give it a second thought"?
But your the guy who is squealing about a little "political bribary" or "brown bagging"?
You must be a Liberal.
Only a Liberal drone would blow off the biggest political theft in Canadian history as insignificant and yet piss and moan about unproven and unsubstantiated Conservative bribery allegations.
I think most rational readers of this thread pretty much know where your coming from.
As to me being Conservative: In the last provincial election I voted green for strategic reasons.
In the present Federal election I will not be able to vote Conservative because I personally feel my local Conservative MP is unethical and less than honest.
Thus once again I will be forced into a second choice stategic vote.
But vote I will.
Trex

I'm not sure old Mulroney wasn't a pretty good thief himself- I think he even stole the light bulbs when he moved out of Sussex Drive. :smile:
Nope- dont think it was light bulbs.

Furniture, works of art, fine china, knives and forks, rugs,sheets, light fixtures and a few other assorted little what-nots.

But the light bulb thing is purely unsubstatiated supposition.
For shame!
 

Trex

Electoral Member
Apr 4, 2007
917
31
28
Hither and yon
Chretien is not running in this election.

On the other hand Harper, Bev Oda, and Jason Kenny are.
And somhow you really believe that a large group of old school Chretienites are no longer in the Federal Liberal party.
Would you like a list of all the "good old boys" still in the Liberal party who simply had to be part and parcel of the most massive political
theft in Candian history?
Please spare me.
And somhow I suppose that some people believe the $100 million dollar Liberal Party of Canada theft is a non issue.
If you were over voting age when all that went down you know damn well what the score is.
Perhaps you support that theft?

And I guess some people believe that the old "Liberal Natural Ruling Party" attitude no longer exists.

They all have warts.
It's a tough game.

However nobody, but nobody has suceeded in stealing more taxpayer money than the Liberal Party of Canada.
It's a cold hard fact that the Liberals have to live with.

I have already stated that I, personally, will not be voting Conservative.

That does not change the fact that the Liberal Party of Canada will have to lay in the bed it made.
Record setting thefts or campaign funding regulations that cripple the Liberals.
They own all that .

Trex
 

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
What a load of crap, first of all the constitution would take ten years to deal with two of
the issues let alone the list, and the courts would take forever to pass that stuff though
their issue ridden system and that would be good. Some people believe we can all go
back to some simpler time and all will be well with the world. Won't happen because
there was no simpler time its all relative.
If you actually did what is advocated it would cause an economic disconnect that would
bankrupt families, institutions, and local governments as the current flow of monetary
transactions would cease to exist. In short they could pass some of this but the courts
and constitution would overturn it. in the meantime the fallout would cause social unrest
in the streets that would bring the nation to its knees.
The people who write this stuff are little more than simplistic minded folks who believe
you can change society with the stroke of a pen and that seldom works. Politics and
societies evolve over time in a semi orderly fashion and sudden shocks or revolution
work in the short term but rarely if ever work in the long term interest of the people of
any state. Communism is Russia is a prime example, for seventy years they tried a
different experiment and the society collapsed. The same would happen if you just
make wholesale changes like the ones proposed here.
 

Avro

Time Out
Feb 12, 2007
7,815
65
48
56
Oshawa
If we were able to do half of what's on that list we'd be way better off.

Time to move out of the house people and take care of yourselves for a change.
 

Jack_Of_Spade

Nominee Member
Mar 31, 2011
87
0
6
And somhow you really believe that a large group of old school Chretienites are no longer in the Federal Liberal party.
Would you like a list of all the "good old boys" still in the Liberal party who simply had to be part and parcel of the most massive political
theft in Candian history?
Please spare me.


And somhow I suppose that some people believe the $100 million dollar Liberal Party of Canada theft is a non issue.
If you were over voting age when all that went down you know damn well what the score is.
Perhaps you support that theft?

And I guess some people believe that the old "Liberal Natural Ruling Party" attitude no longer exists.

They all have warts.
It's a tough game.

However nobody, but nobody has suceeded in stealing more taxpayer money than the Liberal Party of Canada.
It's a cold hard fact that the Liberals have to live with.

I have already stated that I, personally, will not be voting Conservative.

That does not change the fact that the Liberal Party of Canada will have to lay in the bed it made.
Record setting thefts or campaign funding regulations that cripple the Liberals.
They own all that .

Trex
Gee I dont know whats worts a guy who steals from you when your not looking ( Chretien $100 million) or a guy who looks at you in the eyes spends your money and then acts like you should be tankiong him ( Harper $ 100 billion if you include the bail out money

If we were able to do half of what's on that list we'd be way better off.

Time to move out of the house people and take care of yourselves for a change.
You make some good point Avro but the topic is Canada . America would take 3 web page to talk about! LOL