Search results

Canadians can claim refund for overpriced electronics after class action suit - National | Globalnews.ca Canadian consumers who bought electronics between April 1,1999 and June 30, 2002 are eligible to get at least $20 back following several class action lawsuits against the manufacturers of...

Nobody has an alternative. There isn't anything better, which isn't a problem with the process. It's a human problem. The number of different biases categorized numbers in the multiples of tens. Peer review, when it's done well minimizes the contributions our biases make. But it will never be...

Yes. That is most definitely what I have done. It's illogical however to jump from that fact to a conclusion that the process then is meaningless. There is a reason that some journals are more prestigious than others, but still, they're not perfect. Anyone who has worked with this system knows...

Right, I said he has a history of finding journals with reduced standards. I never said the peer review process is meaningless. That's a strawman argument. Peer review is the gold standard, but that doesn't mean it's infallible. Just because one surgeon botches a heart transplant doesn't mean...

Who said that? No, Petros thinks that I'm moving goal posts. You can probably count in the tens the number of times I've mentioned the warming troposphere and cooling stratosphere if you search this site. It's one of the telltale signs that an enhanced greenhouse gas is trapping heat in the...

Troposphere is the lowest layer of atmosphere sampled by the satellites that show the stratosphere is cooling. The ones the skeptics love so much. But I'm sure you knew that. :lol: ETA: Because everyone loves charts! Troposphere warming: Stratosphere cooling:

the stratosphere is cooling when the troposphere warms. :D

I already told you what was weird. The results, which I discussed earlier in this thread. If you're actually interested, stop being lazy and read the thread. I'm not interested in being your dance partner. For everyone else, maybe a lot of you reading this thread don't know, but Soon has a...

You'll have to read the paper yourself, or read the thread.

Peer reviewed findings can't be weird?

Of course not, I discussed his weird findings earlier. In fact I even said I don't care where his money comes from, so long as the science is good. It's not.

Yep, and it looks like Harvard Smithsonian is putting as much distance as they can between Soon and their institute: https://www.facebook.com/Smithsonian/posts/10153248862079574?fref=nf This one might actually send him looking for work elsewhere.

Tell yourself whatever you like, there's certainly more than one difference between you and I. Tosh. I'll respond to the junk you post from news articles. The difference between satellites and thermometer records. Here's UAH since 1979 and HADCRUT: Parallel trend lines. Meaning equivalent...

I'll stop you right there. There are many differences between you and I. You prefer editorials and blog science. I read papers. I'm a scientist, and you're, well I have no idea what you do for a living, but I'm highly skeptical that you're a scientist. I give you data, and your response isn't...

Hmm, I linked you investigations that affirmed the results. I noticed Booker did not disprove the results of investigations into the records. Furthermore, as evidence that the records are accurate measurements of reality, the trends of station data are equivalent to satellite derived...

Yes, you're offering no proof. Just popular unsubstantiated claims. Like I said in my first post. Of course they make adjustments, well described effects like urban heat islands and other land use changes require adjustments. You're assuming that the adjustments are made not to remove bias in...

Case in point.

Lots of good points in this article. It's ironic, because a lot of it is exactly what happens when the deniers respond to a new paper from the 'warmists'. This site is a prime example, someone posts a paper, and various reasons offered that the findings can't possibly be correct include the...

Yes, of course it all mixes, eventually. That doesn't mean the sea level doesn't rise when the sea ice melts. It's not a violation of Archimedes principle.

I'm about to get salty... That's not correct at all. The brine is rejected from the seawater as it approaches the freezing point. But when it melts, it's not as salty, it has a lower density than the sea water it was displacing. That means an equivalent mass of freshwater takes up more volume...