Search results

Nope. I live in Charlottetown now. I work for a pharmaceutical now outside the city ;)

Anytime. Have fun out there. I have to get my license here, and figure out where the good fishing spots are.

I'd say that you should. Ozone hole size is only now plateauing. UVA&B can give you a wicked burn.

OK. On the aspect of solar. Yes, solar irradience is a much higher forcing at 1366 watts, but as you can see it has been cycling up and down again. In order for this to cause global warming we're seeing now, it would mean that the earth would have to be storing heat from the high points of the...

Solar irradience varies by about 0.2 watts from peak to trough, at about 1366 Watts. And how is it exactly you expect this to be causing climate change? For one, you would have to violate thermodynamics for this to be causing a buildup of heat in the atmosphere. Also, 1.6 watts is small...

Net anthropogenic forcing is 1.6 Watts per square meter.

It's not moving the window too much, it's moving it at all. The media is particularly prone to this. They routinely spout the fringe views these days. When the media do this, they effectively take a fringe idea, and move it into the mainstream. A good indication of this would be telltale...

The issue of debate is twisted Bear. Somethings are genuinely debatable. Others are not. Debates can still be had on the issues which are not, but it's not productive. It's on this point though that industries and people who would have to clean up their act, or change their business practices...

Comparing the calendar date in two years is not the same thing as comparing two years... How about comparing monthly averages in those two years? Hmmm, 1980 had about 1 million square kilometers more ice than 2010.

Fixed it for him. As for the paper in PLoS? The author would do well to actually read the paper he cites:

He's dropping the noun now that it is unfavourable to his political life. He faces a tough opponent who is much more on the party line, and being a maverick seems to make one a target these days.

http://forums.canadiancontent.net/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=1246870 They didn't claim to, they just examined the contribution of some greenhouse gases to the top of atmosphere radiative imbalance. I already provided links earlier that show that human activities are leading to increases of...

How many times would you like me to post them? If you just ignore it I don't really see the point in this exercise. But here they are again: Ghosh, P. and Brand W.A., 2003. Stable isotope ratio mass spectrometry in global climate change research. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry...

Yes, like the Fred Singer's of the world...

Not in any way similar to exponentially...how do you figure that? This is a logarithmic growth curve: This is an exponential growth curve: What similarities do you see? If, as you say the sceptics pointed out that warming should occur exponentially, then they are the ones who are unaware...

No, I'm wondering if you know why the tropics should have a hot spot, and how you think this is a greenhouse fingerprint.

In case you still haven't watched Richard Alley's keynote speech at the fall AGU meeting, you probably should. It contains the most up to date answers to many of your questions. A23A It's especially good for a video of a presentation. Slides are presented right next to the video of him...

So? You passed off someone else work as your own. Yes, and I cite the references I read. Just like I did in school when I pass in reports. Just like I do at work when I submit reports. [COLOR=black][FONT=&quot] No, you're not getting it, but that's fine. This point is stale...

No..I made that in Excel. I said it was about 420,000 years of Vostok Ice cores. I never said I took the cores personally. Whereas you said that you would provide an overview. You didn't prepare that overview, it was done by someone else. Me plagiarizing would be to take a graph from somewhere...