Search results

Sure. Not exposing young children to sexual issues so early instead of letting them mature a little first turns them into "rottencrotches". But leave it to the left to resort to insults, not arguments.

https://toronto.ctvnews.ca/ontario-passes-housing-bill-despite-criticism-from-municipalities-over-funding-1.6171507 This is worth a little discussion. Not necessicarily the bill itself but the fact that if anything is going to change, it's going to have to come from the provinces...

Well it's probably not to groom children.

I have to say i'm not sure if i buy this "depeted rusisian stockpiles' thing all that much. For bigger items like tanks and such it makes some sense but things like missiles? I mean, the us and the allies are depleating their stocks too, so they just go to their industries and say "ramp it up...

And predictable. Our biggest mistake was to allow society to recognize how bad it is to be a totalitarian NAZI state and how bad they were, but to basically ignore how bad a totalitarian COMMUNIST or socialist state is. So they can be as left as they like and nobody thinks it's terribly...

They have a 7 year committee looking into that. If our committments are "cheer with mild enthusiasm from the sidelines and send bottles of motivating combat-ready maple syrup then absolutely. The fact is that our soldiers are very well trained and some of the gear we have is decent enough but...

Well he's trying his best to do a little creative history revisiting. He's like that guy in the Simpsons episode who keeps speaking up and then when everyone gets mad and says "who is that" he points to the guy beside him and says "There he is! Gettim fellas!" He wasn't just 'going along' with...

It's going to be well below freezing here this week. I was promised some global warming I believe? I'm going to go outside, Chop down some trees, idle my car for no reason and burn a few tires and see if that helps at all.

This may startle you - Two things can be true at once.

A few - for example he was on ctv question period oct 23 2022 (still on their site i believe or on youtube) and he's asked point blank if he'd continue to support the libs if the ruling goes against them and he does a fine little dance basically saying "well we COULD bring them down at any time...

I've seen Jaggers already distancing himself from the fact he supported it enthusiastically at the time. It'll be interesting to see if the media holds his feet to the fire if the report is negative.

No, our national anthem is the benny hill theme song, but circus music is often mistaken for it

"Oh that was easy" says man, and for an encore goes on to prove that black is white and gets himself killed at the next zebra crossing . -hitchhiker's guide

Well this is it - and also it's not geared towards children. It's one of the left's favorite logical fallacies, the false equivalency. The idea that someone dresses up in a way that's funny in one case and invites people to laugh at them is NOT the same as someone attempting to be taken...

Sure, but the libs and dips said they did and that's enough to pass it. The senate on the other hand was going to shoot it down.

The senate made it clear they wouldn't be backing it.

If the point was to read to kids, it would be called "story hour". Not "drag queen story hour'. And i think thats where most people who disapprove have a problem.

Those who oppose it would arguet there's a few points. First - there's the clear message that if you don't let your children interact with drag queens and people of alternate sexcual orientations on demand you're a horrible person. Sure it's not MANDITORY, but only TERRIBLE people would keep...

None of those demanded there should be children in the audience.