Search results

Here's the non paywall link to that article, https://archive.ph/P1G7A

Well if you're running for the dems, that would make you a traditionalist in their eyes :)

So that's two strikes against him :)

You're assuming she has one. I think everyone knows it wasn't an 'emergency' as envisioned by the act - what concerns me more is that some people feel it was nonetheless justified because it was used against someone they disagree with. "I don't support the truckers, therefore i think the...

LOL Good choice.

No, you're probably thinking of 'translucent', opaque means no light gets through at all. But yeah, you're pretty much right. Trudeau would declare his pant size to be a national secret if he could. Here's justin being transparent testifying at a recent trial while wearing his 'i'm...

One has to be awake to be in charge after all.

The simple fact is that the left's go to tactic is ALWAYS to accuse others of what they themselves do in order to cover that they do it. The 'antifa' people tend to practice facist policy and views for example, the left screams that everyone else is bigoted while they spout their bigotry. In...

LOL - well at least our guys brought horns if nothing else :) Or as the left probably refers to them, Sonic Impulse Terror Death Assault Projector Cannons. And tactical bouncy castles.

Then you are struggling with what the definition of morality and math is. Yeah, that's actually communism, not religion. I made a perfectly valid argument. Your lack of understanding of it doesn't change that. Math is amoral, 1+1 =2 regardless of your moral stance, your religion, etc. But...

The premise is kind of weird - i thought we'd gotten over the stupid notion of trying to make sure nobody gets it. I thought we'd accepted that what we were really looking for is to make sure nobody got THAT sick and hospitalized (or dead), and then let nature take it's course. As long as it's...

Nonsense. First off morality doesn't inform all thinking. I don't need morality to ponder if 2 plus 2 equals 4. So one can have a position on a subject or issue without putting anything 'against' one's morality. Secondly i think you're conflating morality with ethics. Many questions are...

First off - yes. Calling people names like that just makes them hostile. And secondly - seeing as they're NOT, then maybe don't. but once again serryah demonstrates that if there IS a racist bigoted supremist in the room it ain't the OTHER Canadians she's talking about

That's not actually what whataboutism means. Whataboutism is where you try to excuse a bad behavior or event by pointing to a completely unrelated thing entirely and suggest that because something ELSE is bad elsewhere then this should be excused. That is ENTIRELY different than comparing...

ROFLMAO - exactly :)

No more so than an author who takes you to a false moral conclusion. Fiction is fiction.

I would consider justin trudeau to be an emergency and a national threat to Canada. Anyone know where he banks?

Unfortunately that's the only sentence in there that really matters. And while i do expect the commission to say the use of the act was unjustified, it's not going to be anywhere near that harsh i suspect. It'll be more like "The Threat justifying the use did not meet the strictly high bar...

They're all 'fictional narratives' based loosely on actual circumstances. That's why we don't use them for education. Well - except for in your case where apperently not watching them makes you an expert magically. Quite the trick, you should not watch a bunch of other 'fictional documentaries'...

Not really a moral opinion - i'd just recommend books from better authors.