Search results

I did focus on the big picture. You are currently the one posting stuff that completely misses the big picture. So it's kind of hard not to focus on that content. Post something relevant to your argument in the slightest (or at least something that doesn't prove my point instead of yours) and we...

Not for some reason - for specific reasons given. The schools are run by the gov't. Keeping lies and misinformation out of the gov't controlled school system is entirely in keeping with that philosophy. Keep it to just the facts and education, no indoctrination please.

And now you've posted a cbc report proving that i was right - that the reason the gov't wants immigration isn't because of the boomers but rather because they want the immigrants to have jobs and pay taxes.. Seriously do you even watch or read this stuff before posting it?

And now you've posted a link to a dead page: Redirect Notice The previous page is sending you to an invalid url. If you do not want to visit that page, you can...

So you literally just posted something which proves your idea that the reason behind immigration is to pay for the boomers is false.

It just says there will be 'more demand' for oas and health care (provincial). Which i already mentioned and explained.

Repeat it about 4 more times, maybe THAT will change what i just told you

It's not that top heavy. And some of the pension stuff is already funded, so they paid for it. And if you look at the numbers as i said you would be able to support that older population with much lower immigration levels Remember that the biggest gov't pension to the average person (other...

As noted, doesn't work like that. Sorry. They could bring in less than half of the people they are and achieve that without straining our systems.

Well of course we don't. IF we did then there'd be no initial benefit for trudeau to capitalize on. And in fact the numbers clearly show that the second generation is actually more productive than the average Canadian. What he's taking advantage of is the gap between when they start earning...

Whoops - looks like more liberals 'donated' to this company's bottom line. https://globalnews.ca/news/9426074/marci-ien-munch-more-media-contract-ahmed-hussen/

That is true, but as mentioned a declining population is generally a bad thing. I can see why you might think that but no, that's not the main reason. The fact is they could get away with far far less immigration and achieve that. In fact they would achieve that if the population just remained...

LOL - i daresay the NDP won't be commissioning that poll anytime soon :) But you're right, that's something that should be asked.

I mean it's not a great look and it is hilarious but c'mon - seatbelt gate? Take a look at OUR prime minister,if the worst you've got to deal with is he forgot to buckle up once then count your freaking blessings and move on!

Very exiting stuff!

By the way - fun fact, in austrailia years ago they tried to make hiring more "Fair" for women because the left was claiming that people were deliberately not hiring women because they were women. So they tried 'blind' hiring - were all the information that would indicate sex was removed and...

Yes - as long as she hires his relative and he hires hers and they don't work in the same actual office it's just fine apparently.

And yet such 'equality' programs where hiring is based on race and sex are heavily supported by the left. What was it you were saying about the left not supporting oppression?

https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/ndp-could-pull-support-for-government-over-pharmacare-privatization So the ndp has been flailing around looking for SOMETHING that will make it look relevant and threatening to 'end the non coalition coalition', and it's gained very little ground for them...

Lefties get asked regularly and MOST prefer oppression provided it's for a group they don't like. The vast majority in fact. They would see those they disagree with oppressed, canceled, or if possible have the emergency act declared on them :)