Search results

Sure kiddo.

Sigh - wait till they're released for the crime with no permanent criminal record and 20 hours of community service. If you think you're mad now you better have some heart medication handy.

Well that's what it's going to boil down to. Is it ok to 'rely' on others, or did he have a duty to check the firearm himself if he was going to handle it. I have no idea what the actual law on that is for that part of the world. I think the fact he 'relied' on experts keeps him away from...

Well that was a bit of a myth. Harper never muzzled scientists. They could pusblish their works, and of course they could speak on anyone else's published works. What they couldn't do is take gov't money, do research and then charge for a speaking tour making more money from talking about their...

There are women who think Jabba the Hutt is attractive. (no joke :) ) so - to each their own. But i don't know that it would be the prevalent opinion.

Meh, that's just stupid. You really need to start watching more than one youtube channel.

The gov't is incompetent The advisors it hires for craptonnes of money are not. But - they are not hired to benefit canadians, they're hired to give the liberals what the want, and what the liberals want is to delay the economic collapse their overspending will bring on for as long as...

That is, historically, right out of the Liberal play book. That is what happened last time there was a trudeau, and of course when harper got us through a major economic downturn with flying colours the liberals re-wrote history again to make it look like it was all his fault when in fact it...

I posted facts straight from the gov't website Sorry kiddo, we've reached the end. Obviously you've recognized i was correct initially and you're just getting frustrated that you can't make your point stick, and that's not my problem. We'll try again on another subject but at the end of the...

Ok that's a little funny :)

Well they have before and they certainly can under the right conditions. If the liberal support collapses the NDP seat count traditionally goes up. that is the danger Jaggers faces. Add on to that "Besides - if we get a minority Jaggy is going to do what we say and form a coalition anyway so...

Not in the long term. Short to medium. A lot of people retired and retired early during covid. But long term it's not much of a problem. And if it were then highly targeted immigration would be the solution, not just increasing the volume which also increases demands on services. Sure. We...

I can't say you're wrong with any degree of certainty. That may turn out to be entirely true. It depends on how bold he wants to be - play it safe and be guaranteed to be boss till the next election and let the chips fall where they may, or take a risk and maybe wind up gaining a few seats and...

Followed by: That would literally be theory and interpretation. Not facts. Unless you've come up with an empirical unit for measuring "dysphoria"? Would you say that AA's have 10 units of Dysphoria? More? Less? Have you recently calibrated your dysphoriometer?

Your 6 year old was able to crack the code and gain access. I think we need to work on your definition of 'secured'.

Hogwash. That might have been true once upon a time but today? Nonsense. Sure some people will hate on gays - but some people will hate on virtually any group you name. Look at your OWN constant hatred, lack of understanding zero compassion and vitriol against anyone on the right. But by and...

What i presented was the big picture., at least federally. There are a number of problems with that question. First - our work force is not diminishing. It is actuallly growing and has been for some time and would continue to do so with the modest immigration we had previously. As i stated...

There's truth to that, but jaggers knows it's all over if he actually goes to the polls with the coalition still intact. So sure, he'd like to keep it, but if he finds an issue that looks like he can actually increase his share of the vote with then he may well pull that card. He's tried a few...

ahh! So he/she's taken an interest in archeology then? :) (nyuck nyuck!)

No, it's about accuracy and facts for me. It seems to be you who's competing. If we're discussing something and you say something that's not accurate or correct or factual then i post a correction and explain it. There's no competition or malice to it. But for whatever reason you seem to go...