Search results

Who should I send the memo to?

Good intentions.

I couldn't tel you if that is/was the case

Still? I've heard the same hue and cry 30 years ago.

Rest assured that the IPCC has a specific reason for the exclusion of this information. While all i can possibly do is speculate as to the "whys" on this matter, me thinks that it has much to do with the underlying assumptions (upon which their "science" is based) will be somehow brought into...

No big surprise there Walter... As we have seen, whenever this group of alarmists starts to lose traction in the public eye, they affect a name change to reinvent themselves and reinvent a fictitious problem.

Still no answers, eh?

Maybe you can answer th questions Avro... Poor old Tonington is all flustered in his realization that the answer is one that he doesn't want to recognize.

They won't answer you Petros.. They can't without sinking their own feeble position.

You ever heard the expression; garbage in = garbage out... That ought to give you an idea of the IPCC policy. That is the essence of the article, and yes, I read it with a big smile on my face in my local newspaper. .. And now the pendulum has swung.... Your sidekick mentalfloss is relegated...

It is difficult, if not an exercise in futility, to attempt policy action(s) in an area that is not understood. Considering that the IPCC has appointed itself as the global authority on the issue that is (attempting) to ram global policy down the throats of the member nations, it is absolutely...

It looks like the media is getting stronger in retreating from this doomed ship... It's ironic in that they are the ones responsible for promoting the unsubstantiated hype in the first place.

Really? I never got that from you original statement: "Maybe, people at work don't have any issues, my fiance doesn't either. Maybe you're the problem here." Here's a little communication tip for ya: maybe it would have been easier to use the word co-workers. ... And according to you...

People at work?.. This means?.. Kudos on the communication skills. Oh, but it is entirely relevant Mr. Science. Your uber-superficial absolutely depends on your dramatic oversimplification of the system that you don't understand... Of course you'll be willfully ignorant of the dynamic...

Yawn... You still here Avro? Hasn't mentalfloss regaled you with those youtube examples of high science?

Maybe you're just a sh*ty communicator. An imbalance is still an imbalance regardless of natural or unnatural storage/release... You seem hellbent on skewing your logic to custom-suit your argument on a one way basis and hide behind science although the principle you rely upon (balance) is...

What on Earth makes you believe that the carbon's natural state should be "in storage"... It's just a one-way street with you, ain't it -? Hell a parallel argument to yours is that the organics/carbon was unnaturally trapped millions of years ago and has therefore unnaturally altered the system...

... And the anthro causation component is?...... As I've told you literally dozens of times, no one (in my opinion) has sufficient knowledge of the Earth's climate system(s) that is anywhere close top being able to deliver any kind of substantiated answers. Time to get over it buddy... Not...