Search results

Wrong... Again... The biggest difference between you and I is that I have a reasonable idea of knowing what I don't know whereas that sentiment never crosses your mind.

Why are you so choked up? My statement was based on your off-handed statement. This is about GW being driven (highly impacted) by humanity or not. While I'll agree with you on the politicization of the issue by leadership/high profile people, the main thrust of the controversy is pretty...

I'm guessing that you skipped you English languages classes low those many years... I highlighted direct quotes Mr. Science. Great, so we're on the same page then... The consensus is that there is no proof that GW can be specifically pinned primarily on a human influence. (I highlighted the...

But the collective messianic presence at the IPCC are A-OK though, right? So, that's the crux of your rebuttal, eh?... Because the article was offered by a Calgary based media group, it can't have any credibility? I'm not surprised that the AGW position has degenerated to this level - if you...

... But AGW is happening because your god Suzuki says so? How ironic

Here is a link to the complete letter, you ought to give it a read Walter You can, and should, read the entire text of Prof. Lewis’s letter by following the link here.

Wow.. I suppose that this shouldn't be any kind of surprise with the three of you deluding yourselves into believing that this document strengthens your position. Without question, each of you have invested so much personal capital that there is nothing that will prove to you that your position...

Yeah sure, the report actually supports the IPCC and all the denizens of greenie-land.... Whatever helps you sleep at night. BTW - watch the video and if that doesn't help, ask Petros, he'll help you out on the sidekick thingy

It could make a case for not jay-walking for all I care. Don't be so coy Avro, I can already sense the 2-stepping and radical modofication of your individual position on this issue. The bottom-line: This report flies in the face of the IPCC, East Anglia, etc in that it doesn't hang human...

No misrepresentation.... You just don't like the reality It undermines the entire theory that curbing emissions will have any form of tangible impact on climate fluctuations... The kind of impact that you guys have been pretending exist As far as your comment about childish comments is...

... So, you're saying that the Royal Society didn't publish those words?... As expected, attack and question the voracity of the medium as opposed to accept the very words directly from your messianic leadership. I can see that this is hard for you to swallow, coming to the realization that you...

This report absolutely submarines your position Avro. It includes human activity as a contributor among other natural (ie. non-anthro) causes and actually points to past episodes as part of the logic to prove such.... But I did enjoy your diversion that complaining that the link wasn't present...

What to believe, eh? "The Royal Society does not deny global warming is occurring, but admits no one cause can be assigned to it. "There is very strong evidence to indicate that climate change has occurred on a wide range of different time scales from decades to many millions of years; human...

The end is not nigh Finally, common sense on global warming B ritain's Royal Society, one of the most venerable science academies, has amended its idiots' guide to global warming. Officially titled Climate Change, A Summary of the Science, the 19-page layman's document is a refreshing...

So, in your mind, the UN was responsible for NAFTA and NATO?.. There's not much left to say if that is your position; it's clear that you feel that any global organization is the spawn of the UN. As far as the IPCC is concerned. They are as useless as teats on a bull. Any organization that is...

Physician... Heal thyself

I see that you are keen to bend over backwards in absolving the consumers and yourself from any responsibility in wrecking havoc on ole mother Gaia... It's all due to the big bad industrial machine, eh? So, tell me Cliffy. Have you eliminated your consumption from these terrible industrialists...

Sure you do... You think that they have god-like qualities; that they are infallible... Clearly this is the case as you have condemned anything contrary to the IPCC's position as "junk science". And you're right by the way, that the IPCC doesn't produce the science, they are in the self-imposed...

But it's more than enough to idolize that body as the epitome of all things scientific and right. Amazing how that hypocritical position is constantly applied by the greenies out there.

Not NATO, but the UN and Greenpeace would be a great start