Search results

Your position is without merit Cliffy, especially as you support oil each and every day. Why is it that the eco-fringe spend all of their time pissing and moaning about what others should do yet have zero solutions to offer?.. If you're upset with oil companies Cliffy, stop making them wealthier...

... But the science was settled not so long ago, it was definitive. Now all the sudden, it is riddled with caveats and disclaimers. The thrust of the damage from teh Society's paper lies in the strong presence of these disclaimers; that presence was not there before. But this discussion is...

Whatever... I too could really care less, but rather than trolling through dead threads, at least man-up and make your statement head-on on the post that offends your sensibilities. Normally that would be a 2 sentence response, however, for the fanatic, it requires a bit more. Whether you...

Well, someone using your name did just that... maybe Kriskat has your login info?

Please spare me... This issue has proven to be far more complex and involved than any ridiculous youtube video that you elect to post. Maybe you can source some youtube videos that outline a do-it-yourself home liver transplant... That's kinda in the same range as your oversimplification of...

Youtube does not qualify as pro bono

Well, it would sure save me a lot of time in responding to your contributions... That one word accurately captures the spirit and content of your submissions.

Rhetoric

What a comeback... You must have spent days developing that amazing rebuttal

A question for you... How long ago, approximately, was it that the IPCC and the affiliated greenie groups were stating - as fact - that the warming trend was driven solely/primarily by anthro sources? The answer is that it was not that long ago, a few years maybe. At that time, the IPCC was...

No. I suggested that the Royal Society's report did not gleefully support the IPCC's stance and the standard greenie belief's.. No mention of contradiction, those are your words. ... What was that you were mentioning about reading comprehension? Nope.. again.. You were the leader of the...

To start, whether you believe if I read the report or not is irrelevant, you have a perfect track record of fitting the science to your pre-determined position, it comes as no surprise that you've pre-determined my position.. the ultimate self-fulfilling prophecy. In terms of your diatribe on...

I'm not your therapist, but if want me to guess, you're all chocked-up because the Royal Society published a paper, based on the IPCC report that was not supportive of your greenie position. Now, remember, that's a guess, but than again, you asked. My doubts?... I doubt that either of you...

How ironic. No sooner that Avro uses the word sidekick, Chester appears.

I'm guessing that Avro will launch into some diatribe about conspiracies and coincidence. You're dreaming if you'll get anything rational from any of the Truthers.... Proof is something that they are sadly lacking in, but they have something better.. faith

You tell me, unless there is some secret conspiracy that demands your silence Unlike your buddy (and yourself at times), I don't claim or insinuate mastery of every discipline and pretend that I am an expert in any/all fields of study Buddy does whatever he wants, I really could care...

I'll agree with that.. You posted propaganda.

Avro, If you're not chocked up about it, perhaps we ought to just drop it entirely. i never suggested the politicization of the issue was exclusive to the left. I made a broadbrush statement directed at all. As far as the issue of AGW is concerned, it is black and white (important caveat - I...

... But it's more than objective for the Climate Progress organization- that is billed by Time magazine as "The webs most influential climate-change blogger" to apply their own Op/Ed? I suppose that you only apply that critical analysis for those groups that don't support your position. PS -...

Most recently, The Royal Society's paper