Search results

Ya know..... We could drill a small hole, drop in a flare and have a huge fish-fry. You game?

Green lobbies are looking to manipulate the market on a basis that makes their uncompetitive tech sustainable, that's not 'using' the markets; that is a destruction of the market. There ain't no power when the wind don't blow Agreed.. Why isn't it happening? That ought to get you in all...

There's gotta be some pain involved with the gain... Green tech needs to evolve into the next generation AND appeal to the masses (or at least a portion thereof)... Forcing one option through artificially rejigging the market will create unrealistic and unsustainable expectations within the...

I guess that you didn't get the message re: green tech actually providing something cost effective. On the subsidy issue, there is an easy way to eliminate the oil/gas tax incentives...

Sad to say but it has to do with that whole 'money talks' thing. Bottom line, the public has demonstrated their fickleness towards the whole issue... Give 'em a reason such as lower bills and a more cost effective alternative and you'll have everyone on board.

More propaganda from another scaremonger Too bad the poll had no mention of having to pay more for the power, but then again, they didn't want to publish those results.

I'll agree with you there on the 'renewable' concept especially based on the notion that there are theories relative to non-biotic oil originating from the deeps (I think that you might have posted a link in the past). In my opinion, the biggest danger from the green brigade is based on the...

This entire 'project' would make more sense if it was easier to sell into the grid (over supply from a home solar/wind unit). There are a variety of obstacles and restrictions that limit the ability for an individual to sell power into the grid which would mitigate the capital cost of...

... And, that still does not change the fact that your wind power doesn't exist when there ain't no wind. Why is that so hard for you to actually recognize as fact?

Good point... All of those heavy metals are friends to the environment!

That pie-in-the-sky logic is great, but it still doesn't change the fact that you can't generate power from the wind when there is none nor can you generate solar power when the sun don't shine. Thanks for the good wishes for my day... It's already been fantastic!

Here's a reason. Memo to Wilson: No wind, no wind power | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog

New study debunks myths about vulnerability of Amazon rain forests to drought

I wonder if they bring in any fluffers to the meetings.... It'd be a nice little perk is all I'm sayin'.

There is no "denial" of the observations. It is the possible cause of those observations that is in question. Now, be a good little fluffer and get back to the salmon party

Wow... I guess that these discussions qualify as peer reviewed.... Man, this whole science-thingy is no where near as hard as I thought.

I see... So, what you're really saying is that your address to Walter's post is entirely unrelated to AGW in any way shape or form and because of that, there is no need for you to fit this event into the rock-solid model that you greenies have going.. Gotcha You're a poor communicator. Maybe...

.. But you just decided to leave out the "record cold" part of the equation in explaining Anthropogenic Global Warming. My point had nothing to do with record temps.. I leave that style of sensationalist marketing to you and Gore... And in true style, I see that you are working furiously to...

Is that they post where you claimed that higher temps cause more H2O in the atm and therefore why it is snowing... That post where you forgot the part that it takes colder temps to actually create the snow? As for my questions, they are not contingent on whose post you were referring to. It's a...

Yes.. My question is based on your claim.