Search results

Well, it's like this... We never had the phrase "climate change" or "global warming" in the past, all we had was climate normalcy. Now that we have these new words, the problem is obvious. It's kinda like tidal action. Before it was recognized by mankind, it didn't exist.

Ya see.. Back in the past, we had climate-normalcy, but because of climate change, the rivers that normally would overflow don't. Don't you see?.. It's so obvious... I can't believe we are even having this discussion!

I think that you may have something here, afterall, it is the first time in recorded history

Is the answer to the fill-in-the-blank, "gullible"

So, NASA advertises 3rd party information that they do not support?

How ironic.. The AGW Emperor has no clothes and is suffering from terrible shrinkage due to the plummeting temps... But rest assured, the globe is warming

You're sorely mistaken... You'd be Chester. Need the youtube reference?

The comments at the bottom are hilarious

This shouldn't come as any big surprise.

It was only a matter of time, but the whole deal is getting expedited due to politics. I'd wager that if a functional relationship can be established that will more trade with Asian communities, especially in the agri sector, (more) mining and forestry. If this happens, the days of either...

Lots of interest in the sector... Funny you mention Asia. Everytime that the Obama admin pisses and moans about CCS and dirty-oil, there is a little more action on teh pipeline to the West Coast.

I mistakenly assumed that because he stated that he addressed the Q that he actually did. I am not terribly surprised.

Thanks Petros, I was unable to find that answer from the individual I initial had requested the answer.

I will go look... I look forward to understanding the approximate land mass that is affected by the contrails posted by Petros.

I suppose that I must have missed the answer... Oh well.

There's the other side of the argument, that being the gross dissemination of info to the public at large. here's an example; you might want to pass this long to mentalfloss. He is, afterall, a big supporter of youtube. YouTube - The Puppet Show - Global Warming

Personally. I'm quite interested in hearing a response to this... Among others of course.

Margins of error are directed related to confidence levels, degrees of freedom, etc. Mr. Science..... I should have known that you'd fall-back on your crutch that requires semantics as the deflection issue. But lets run with your blunder... Where, exactly, do your data points originate...

... And you didn't answer the initial question. We've discussed this, your statistical equation would require enough "corrective techniques" such that it would have a significant double digit margin of error, unless of course you are stating that you know, with absolute certainty, most if not...

So... No answer then, eh? Strawman! Rhetoric! Red Herring! Let me guess, you're a self appointed expert statistician, climatologist, meteorologist, geophysicist, geologist and model developer... I suppose that's why they call you Mr. Science Blah, blah, blah... More ignorant ranting and...