Search results

The red herring is that it is plausible to dismiss the lack of knowledge, understanding (let alone capacity to identify all of the variables & interactions) and claim to make conclusive statements regarding causation. I have no problem with models or with statistics for that matter. That...

Still haven't addressed the primary question: I've emboldened your quote in case you missed it last time

Therapy can strongly help in that.

How about we start with you explaining this comment in light of this direct quote from your enviro-bible: "Water vapour is the most abundant and important greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. However, human activities have only a small direct influence on the amount of atmospheric water vapour. "

Yikes!

I most certainly did read your comments. Like I told your buddy, water vapor is both a cause and effect in terms of influencing the temperatures... What you are suggesting via you comments is akin to stating that one snow flake is not an avalanche, therefore avalanches contain no snow. I...

Have you ever thought of steaming the ribs in the oven and then applying your favorite recipe?

Tonnington, Vapor is both a feedback and a forcing all at the same time, the effect perpetuates itself through its own cycles. The effect that it can have will be expressd in variations in the climate and temperature record. That effect is evident in the historical record as expressed in the...

.... And have proven nothing Let me give you a little help on this Chester; Water vapour is the most abundant and important greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. However, human activities have only a small direct influence on the amount of atmospheric water vapour.

Such a theatrical diatribe that goes no where in addressing the issues at hand. If you want the proof, then go read the IPCC report for yourself Chester. Don't be so lazy such that you rely on others to do your homework... Hell, maybe there's a youtube video that will explain it to you via a...

Have you ever even read your eco-bible? It's stated in there quite clearly. You sure are a hoot Chester. When you don't have an argument, you piss and moan that it's everyone else's responsibility to prove you wrong, assuming of course, that you are correct.

Your standard response when you lack a response. Your position requires that I prove a negative. Perhaps you ought to debate this with an individual that boasts a PhD in philosophy.

The billions currently being collected are (indirectly) subsidizing green tech... That in itself is not bad, however, the current trend sees the subsidizing the installation of these inefficient technologies that cannot stand on their own economically. What is very concerning is that these...

Surprising that you don't hear the IPCC or a rabid Suzuki raising hell about it... I suppose that they'd be expected to refrain from flying all over the place every week.

Interesting view from 40,000+ feet

What is the geographical area that these cover?

Does all this count as the ramifications of GW too? YouTube - The Blues Brothers - Jake's Excuses

You missed "little kittens stuck in trees".

Good article

I see.... So $600 Mazadas are good for the environment, are they?.. That $20 in gas each month doesn't put profit in the oil companies pockets? Sorry Cliffy, either put your money where you mouth is or stop bitching about a group that makes a profit on a product that you voluntarily purchase...