Search results

Sweet... Make sure you avoid the gun-fire

Yes.

That depends... Did the CRU commission a study by those same panel members to peer review themselves and look for their own bias?

Is this a rumor? The CRU was cleared of fraud by a panel commissioned by the University of East Anglia.

You are avoiding the issue

I guess that reading and comprehension just ain't your thing. Good luck.

No need to get your blood pressure up on this. Go back and read my initial statement and the one(s) made by Baals Tears and maybe you'll see the issue (although I'm not really hopeful).

.. And you know how to spam threads.. I'm guessing that you opted out of your reading comprehension classes waaayyy back in the day... It's not that the CRU didn't work independently, it is that they are not an independent body.

The CRU was cleared of fraud by a panel commissioned by the University of East Anglia.

The other side of that observation is equally valid.. There is no amount of logic, evidence or otherwise that will alter the views of the alarmists. Like I mentioned to Tonnington, my position was/is not to debate the validity of Climategate, it was simply to state that the "investigation" was...

.. Or, the standard answer

I've attempted the same as you.... You have seen the results

Obtuse? You find objectivity and the criminal justice system obtuse? Regardless, it had much more to do than peer review.. There were direct allegations of academic fraud for the purpose of securing funding (among other serious allegations). Peer review on that issue is irrelevant. The details...

I should have guessed... It's only fair to allow the accused to judge themselves. Go figure

First off, I brought up Climategate as an example, I'm not interested in getting into whether or not that event was fraud or misunderstanding or whatever. That said, any investigation into these matters would need to involve a non-partisan and apolitical authority... Again, without getting into...

Based on some of the emails related to Climategate, misuse of funds and insinuations of misconduct relative to the research would merit investigation and potential charges of fraud.

"Science" has morphed itself into the predominate religion of the 21st century. Anyone group/individual that does not march lockstep and maintain an unquestioning and unwavering position is grilled at the behest of today's contemporary Inquisition... The most recent rash of doomsayers is...

Individuals, corporations and society as a whole are subject to answer to the courts for fraudulent or misleading deeds, what makes science exempt from this especially if it is intended to impact national policy

Funny.... The IPCC is exactly that

Impossible sir!... They have all been peer-reviewed!