Search results

  1. S

    Global Warming ‘Greatest Scam in History’

    You don't understand.. We were too late on being the first to declare CO2 a toxin, so it only makes sense to get waaayyy ahead of the curve and work on legislating volcanic activity.
  2. S

    Global Warming ‘Greatest Scam in History’

    Hmmmm... Smoke signals from mother Earth herself, eh?... I hadn't counted on that possibility. What are the chances that you and I can selectively interpret those signals as proof-positive that the public (and governments) MUST donate to our cause and buy any books endorsed by those "in the...
  3. S

    Global Warming ‘Greatest Scam in History’

    We could, but it'd be more fun if we can con the greenies that it's possible to pass anti-volcano legislation. I'm certain that there will be many that will get on board.
  4. S

    Global Warming ‘Greatest Scam in History’

    You know that it was only a matter of time... Hell, just think of it as another potential revenue stream for Suzuki, Gore, et al to fleece those that embody the blind-faith of the-cause-du-jour.
  5. S

    Global Warming ‘Greatest Scam in History’

    It might be one of those anthropogenic volcanoes that I've been hearing so much about... I think that Exxon Mobile is developing volcano technology to replace oil/gas. :lol:
  6. S

    Global Warming ‘Greatest Scam in History’

    Impossible!... Why, it's proven that climate change is man-made!
  7. S

    Global Warming ‘Greatest Scam in History’

    I quoted the only part of your post that made sense. ...BTW - You oughta go see a Dr. and have that dealt with.
  8. S

    Global Warming ‘Greatest Scam in History’

    Did the title of the thread give it away? Hmmmm... Perhaps I'll go to the Wiki site and edit the info - anyone can do that you know... Getting the gist yet?
  9. S

    Global Warming ‘Greatest Scam in History’

    Do you even know what was being spoken about here? Is this a Wiki-list of border-line fraudsters that change their science to support the "cause-celeb" in order to raise money for themselves?
  10. S

    Global Warming ‘Greatest Scam in History’

    The link to climate change and anthropogenic sources are fully in question... You are seeing what you want to see rather than what is. One of those "experts" was Suzuki 20 or 30 years ago, obviously his tune has changed... That isn't exactly a beacon of support for his current claims now, is it?
  11. S

    Global Warming ‘Greatest Scam in History’

    Not to mention the variety of other gasses and materials. Factor in these as well as the air-borne particulate that is emitted via volcanism and it amplifies the effect significantly.
  12. S

    Our cooling world

    It can't be Walter.. Impossible... Why, there are at least 2 others that know (for a fact apparently) that this new ice is Global Warming ice.. I'm certain that there's a study to determine that as it is newer, it confirms that the planet is warming at an extraordinary rate.
  13. S

    AGW Grudge Match

    You did know... I made very strong insinuations that I would question your sources at the outset of this thread... What did you think would be the result when you base your "facts" on a group that has been fumbling about retracting their facts as fast as they possibly can. YOU assumed the...
  14. S

    AGW Grudge Match

    … So… No discussion or rebuttal of my submissions then? I’ve responded to this. Reposting the same info doesn’t change the synopsis that the study is flawed. Blog posts, eh? And here I was under the assumption that this was a scholarly debate. Because you've...
  15. S

    AGW Grudge Match

    Analysis of the preliminary references you sumitted: 1. John E. Harries, Helen E. Brindley, Pretty J. Sagoo & Richard J. Bantges. 2001. Increases in greenhouse forcing inferred from the outgoing longwave radiation spectra of the Earth in 1970 and 1997. Nature, 410: 355-357. 2. Jennifer A...
  16. S

    AGW Grudge Match

    ….But, I see that yo’re not above it, as is evidenced in this post No, it’s actually getting quit interesting – I notice that you haven’t properly cited a number of you submissions in this very post. THE source, eh? How about some research to back it up? Looks like you’re in...
  17. S

    AGW Grudge Match

    I can’t believe that we’re having this exchange re: plagiarism. Based on your recent focus on plagiarism I thought that it would be beneficial to provide some perspective and grounding on this “scholarly debate” of ours. To start, neither of us are climate scientists that are developing any...
  18. S

    AGW Grudge Match

    Kinda like your most recent screen-shot?.. I can't recall the citations, so am I to assume that the research, data and development of the graph are yours?.. Shame on you for that unabashed plagiarism... That said, neither one of us is submitting original thought and as such, any talking points...
  19. S

    AGW Grudge Match

    Opps... The graphs did not copy over...