Search results

Wrong. I stated that Monbiat is a zoologist and NOT a climate expert. That's it...You assumed the rest. ... What's that you were saying about being closed to evidence?

More expert is vastly different from being expert... A family doctor may be more expert that the average person on the street, but that does not qualify that person as a neuro surgeon.

Interesting post... I never really thought that people like you really existed - looks like I was wrong. thanks for the link on caribou and zoologists... Clearly they are interested therefore they must be reliable experts in all things. hell, I suppose that they are expert geologists as part of...

i stated that Monbiot based his opinion on "debunked science"... His credentials are that he is a zoologist. Unless zoology, as a discipline, has recently dedicated their full focus on climate based study, then the assessment stands - Zoologists are not climate experts. The publications that...

The snow shovel companies in Washington DC have an interest in climate too... That doesn't make them experts now, does it? There's all kinds of evidence both pro and con. The difference is the pro global warming "experts" are now admitting to the many frauds that exist. That said, I can't...

Show me any evidence that supports it.. That is if you can find some that hasn't already been unveiled as fraudulent.

Monbiot's contributions were nothing more than his opinion that he generated through cherry-picking selective data that, on a narrow basis, supports his beliefs... Considering that the self-appointed experts at the UN, NASA, et al have recently been publicly debunked, it's tough to believe any...

George Monbiot is an environmental activist trained in zoology. Clearly he is an educated man, but that does not qualify him as an expert in this debate... His is essentially an opinion and nothing more.

The point is that the presentations will be treated in exactly the same manner in which Walter's contribution was treated - that is - it is without any merit.

Didn't you recently lambaste Walter for inclusion of an Op-Ed piece as having no relevance in this discussion? The Guardian?... Really?

Does one month in Vancouver confirm it?

An officially recognized government taking that step is significant.

Now I can see why the global warming movement is losing so much support

Interesting document, but it doesn't answer my question

The "first"the cycle was held this long? When did the second longest occur?

That cycle has bee occurring for millennia