Black Lives Matter-Ugliness of Racism.

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
118,944
14,615
113
Low Earth Orbit
Well,


Be careful what you stupid.
And our graduates immigrate to the US, EU, Mid East.

Oh yeah, Japan too.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
30,283
11,170
113
Regina, Saskatchewan

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
118,944
14,615
113
Low Earth Orbit

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
39,361
3,643
113
Jury deliberates in trial of 3 New York corrections officers charged in inmate’s fatal beating
Author of the article:Associated Press
Associated Press
Michael Hill
Published Oct 15, 2025 • 3 minute read

FILE - This image provided by the New York State Attorney General office shows body camera footage of correction officers beating a handcuffed man, Robert Brooks, at the Marcy Correctional Facility in Oneida County, N.Y., Dec. 9, 2024. (New York State Attorney General office via AP, File)
FILE - This image provided by the New York State Attorney General office shows body camera footage of correction officers beating a handcuffed man, Robert Brooks, at the Marcy Correctional Facility in Oneida County, N.Y., Dec. 9, 2024. (New York State Attorney General office via AP, File) AP
UTICA, N.Y. — A jury began deliberating Wednesday in the trial of three former New York state corrections officers charged in the fatal beating of an inmate that was captured on bodycam video.


Lawyers spent most of the day delivering closing arguments in a Utica court in the trial of Mathew Galliher, Nicholas Kieffer and David Kingsley, who face charges of murder and first-degree manslaughter in the death of Robert Brooks. The 43-year-old man was beaten by multiple guards upon his arrival at the Marcy Correctional Facility on Dec. 9. Five officers indicted in February have previously pleaded guilty to manslaughter in Brooks’ death under plea deals.


Defence lawyers told the jury their clients were not among the guards who struck Brooks and that they made quick decisions in a chaotic situation that night.

“Just because corrections officers wear the same uniform, doesn’t mean they’re part of the same gang. It doesn’t mean they have the same motivations, the same knowledge or the same intent,” said Kingsley’s attorney, Luke Nebush. “The acts of some, even those that look violent on video, do not make everyone in that room equally culpable.”


Kingsley lifted Brooks by the neck on the night he was beaten.

Brooks had been serving a 12-year sentence for first-degree assault since 2017 and was transferred to Marcy from a nearby lockup that night. The videos show officers striking the handcuffed man in the chest with a shoe, lifting him by the neck and dropping him.

William Fitzpatrick, the special prosecutor, told the jury that all the guards were in it together, part of what he called a “welcoming committee.”

“They killed him — the whole rotten, stinking, disgusting group of them,” Fitzpatrick said. “They all participated in it, and they all killed that man.”

Fitzpatrick has said Brooks was beaten three separate times when he arrived at the prison, the last a fatal beating in the infirmary caught on the silent bodycam footage.


Fitzpatrick played a long clip of the bodycam video as part of his closing, showing the defendants’ actions that night and making critical comments about their failure to intervene.

Brooks suffered a broken nose, a black eye and injuries to the spleen, liver and groin. Blood leaked into his lungs and stomach, officials said.

Footage brought outrage
The publicly released footage of the brutal pummeling stirred outrage and calls for prison reform.

Galliher’s attorney also showed portions of those videos Wednesday to demonstrate that Galliher showed up partway through the incidents started to bring leg shackles, as requested by a supervisor. Kevin Luibrand said Galliher orchestrated nothing and tried to do his job despite minimal training and lack of guidance from his sergeants.


“These were circumstances that Mathew Galliher did not create,” Luibrand said.

Luibrand blamed Brooks’ death on other officers who worked out plea deals.

Kieffer’s attorney, David Longeretta, said his client administered a “minimum” amount of pepper spray, but it “had no effect” on Brooks.

“The prosecution’s strategy in this case seems to have been, ‘charge them all and let the jury figure it out,”” Longeretta said.

Jurors deliberated briefly Wednesday before being sent home. They will resume Thursday.

A grand jury indicted 10 guards on murder and lesser charges. In addition to the five men who pleaded guilty to either first- or second-degree manslaughter, another pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of attempted tampering with physical evidence.


Another corrections officer is scheduled to go on trial for second-degree manslaughter in January.


Three more employees have agreed to plead guilty to reduced charges and are cooperating with prosecutors, including two former guards who testified at the trial.

Kieffer and Galliher also were charged with second-degree gang assault. Kieffer faces a fourth charge of filing a false instrument.

The prison is about 290 kilometers northwest of New York City.

Fitzpatrick, the Onondaga County district attorney, also is prosecuting guards in the fatal beating of Messiah Nantwi on March 1 at a nearby prison, the Mid-State Correctional Facility. Ten guards were indicted in April, including two who are charged with murder, in Nantwi’s death.
1760635820118.png
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
39,361
3,643
113
Black staff at Global Affairs Canada allege systemic racism
Author of the article:Canadian Press
Canadian Press
Dylan Robertson
Published Oct 22, 2025 • 2 minute read

OTTAWA — Current and former Global Affairs Canada employees who are Black say the department doesn’t take their complaints about racism seriously.


“I was representing Canada but Canada did not represent me,” said Madina Iltireh, who spent more than 20 years working on the administration of foreign aid programs.


She spoke Wednesday on Parliament Hill at a news conference held by the Coalition Against Workplace Discrimination. The coalition includes the Black Class Action Secretariat, which is mounting legal challenges claiming systemic racism and discrimination in the public service.

The group is appealing a broader case involving the entire public service. It estimates the Federal Court of Appeal will take a year to rule on the case.

On Wednesday, the coalition cited three Global Affairs Canada staff who say their complaints were rejected by internal panels before being upheld by the courts or outside commissions, without compensation.


They include Iltireh, who is Black and wears a hijab.

In May, a Global Affairs Canada investigation found the diplomat overseeing Canada’s embassy in Kuwait “bullied” Iltireh and “adopted discriminatory practices” against her.

The investigation — which only came about when a court ordered the department to stop dismissing her claims — found the embassy head “failed to ensure that Madina Iltireh worked in a healthy work environment.”

“The place I was (for three years) was toxic, and it was suffocating,” she said.

Nicholas Marcus Thompson, executive director of the Black Class Action Secretariat, cited other cases of GAC employees who identify with a range of minority groups and who filed complaints that were dismissed.


He said they include a staffer who made complaints against an executive who was later found by the public sector integrity commissioner to have berated and slapped staff members.

“It is as bad at Global Affairs as we found in other departments,” Thompson said.

“There is a mechanism to report discrimination. That mechanism blocks it. Workers are silenced … and while those workers are held back, the leaders advance.”

The foreign service is undertaking changes aimed at more merit-based promotion and a healthier work culture, as part of a broader reform launched in 2022. The Future of Diplomacy initiative has led to public disclosures of cases of wrongdoing at GAC, a streamlined complaint system and a well-being ombudsperson.


Thompson said those changes don’t adequately address the needs of Black employees, who have called for stronger anti-discrimination legislation and expert panels independent of the public service to investigate claims of discrimination.

“We’re not seeing deep-rooted reforms, simply Band-Aid solutions that pass over quickly with change of management,” he said.

Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand told reporters Wednesday that discrimination in any form is unacceptable.

“We need to have a public service where inclusivity and diversity are stronger because that makes our government stronger, our organizations stronger and our country stronger,” she said.

Anand said she is looking into at least one of the cases cited by the secretariat to address systemic issues within Global Affairs Canada.

“It’s a priority for me as a minister at this time, and it’s a priority for me as a racialized woman,” she said in French.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,697
8,212
113
B.C.
Black staff at Global Affairs Canada allege systemic racism
Author of the article:Canadian Press
Canadian Press
Dylan Robertson
Published Oct 22, 2025 • 2 minute read

OTTAWA — Current and former Global Affairs Canada employees who are Black say the department doesn’t take their complaints about racism seriously.


“I was representing Canada but Canada did not represent me,” said Madina Iltireh, who spent more than 20 years working on the administration of foreign aid programs.


She spoke Wednesday on Parliament Hill at a news conference held by the Coalition Against Workplace Discrimination. The coalition includes the Black Class Action Secretariat, which is mounting legal challenges claiming systemic racism and discrimination in the public service.

The group is appealing a broader case involving the entire public service. It estimates the Federal Court of Appeal will take a year to rule on the case.

On Wednesday, the coalition cited three Global Affairs Canada staff who say their complaints were rejected by internal panels before being upheld by the courts or outside commissions, without compensation.


They include Iltireh, who is Black and wears a hijab.

In May, a Global Affairs Canada investigation found the diplomat overseeing Canada’s embassy in Kuwait “bullied” Iltireh and “adopted discriminatory practices” against her.

The investigation — which only came about when a court ordered the department to stop dismissing her claims — found the embassy head “failed to ensure that Madina Iltireh worked in a healthy work environment.”

“The place I was (for three years) was toxic, and it was suffocating,” she said.

Nicholas Marcus Thompson, executive director of the Black Class Action Secretariat, cited other cases of GAC employees who identify with a range of minority groups and who filed complaints that were dismissed.


He said they include a staffer who made complaints against an executive who was later found by the public sector integrity commissioner to have berated and slapped staff members.

“It is as bad at Global Affairs as we found in other departments,” Thompson said.

“There is a mechanism to report discrimination. That mechanism blocks it. Workers are silenced … and while those workers are held back, the leaders advance.”

The foreign service is undertaking changes aimed at more merit-based promotion and a healthier work culture, as part of a broader reform launched in 2022. The Future of Diplomacy initiative has led to public disclosures of cases of wrongdoing at GAC, a streamlined complaint system and a well-being ombudsperson.


Thompson said those changes don’t adequately address the needs of Black employees, who have called for stronger anti-discrimination legislation and expert panels independent of the public service to investigate claims of discrimination.

“We’re not seeing deep-rooted reforms, simply Band-Aid solutions that pass over quickly with change of management,” he said.

Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand told reporters Wednesday that discrimination in any form is unacceptable.

“We need to have a public service where inclusivity and diversity are stronger because that makes our government stronger, our organizations stronger and our country stronger,” she said.

Anand said she is looking into at least one of the cases cited by the secretariat to address systemic issues within Global Affairs Canada.

“It’s a priority for me as a minister at this time, and it’s a priority for me as a racialized woman,” she said in French.
Waaa give us money .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dixie Cup

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
118,944
14,615
113
Low Earth Orbit
This line....

The foreign service is undertaking changes aimed at more merit-based promotion and a healthier work culture, as part of a broader reform launched in 2022.

Make of it what you will.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Dixie Cup

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
39,361
3,643
113
White Democrats 'will not vote for Black candidates,' says NAACP
Author of the article:Larry Elder
Published Oct 26, 2025 • 3 minute read

Janai Nelson, front, president of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, who was arguing on behalf of a group of Black voters, speaks with media after departing the court, Oct. 15, 2025, in Washington.
Janai Nelson, front, president of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, who was arguing on behalf of a group of Black voters, speaks with media after departing the court, Oct. 15, 2025, in Washington.
The Supreme Court is considering a Louisiana redistricting case that could have a greater impact on U.S House of Representatives seats than the Texas and California “gerrymandering” manoeuvres combined.


The New York Times wrote, “Democrats would be in danger of losing around a dozen majority-minority districts across the South if the court struck down part of the Voting Rights Act.”


White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller tweeted, “How many people just realized that Dems had as many as 20 extra seats based on years of unconstitutional race-based gerrymandering?”

For the purpose of “racial justice” under the Voting Rights Act, Democrat legislatures and politicians created several “majority-minority” districts in order to elect Black and Hispanic congressional members. The Supreme Court will rule on whether these districts violate equal protection under the Constitution.

ACLU Voting Rights Project Director Sophia Lin Lakin, who supports these majority-minority districts, said: “Sec. 2 of the Voting Rights Act has been a critical tool in safeguarding the promise that people of colour can participate in our democracy on equal terms. It has been our shield against discriminatory maps and our answer to laws designed to suppress the vote. Congress passed the Voting Rights Act with overwhelming, bipartisan support — and reauthorized it again and again — because our leaders understood a fundamental truth: you cannot cure discrimination by pretending it doesn’t exist.”


NAACP lawyer Janai Nelson told the court, “It was clear that, regardless of party, white Democrats were not voting for Black candidates whether they were Democrats or not. We know that there is such a significant chasm between how Black and white voters vote in Louisiana that there is no question that even if there is some correlation between race and party, that race is the driving factor.”

The Supreme Court decades ago in Shaw v. Reno (1993) and Miller v. Johnson (1995) ruled against districts where gerrymandering by race was the dominant factor. “Ethnic cleansing!” cried Jesse Jackson after the Miller decision. Elaine Jones of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund said, “The noose is tightening.” Her colleague, Theodore Shaw, warned that once this decision goes through, the Black Congressional Caucus “could meet in the back seat of a taxicab.” But of the Black House members in the four redesigned majority-white Southern districts who decided to run for reelection, three won. One chose not to run.


In 2016, the city of over 100,000 population that most voted for Donald Trump, with 80% of the vote, was Abilene, Texas, a city that is over 75% white. Shortly after Trump’s election, Abilene voted for its first Black mayor. Black Rep. Byron Donalds (R-Fla.) recently said: “Myself, Wesley Hunt, Burgess Owens, John James — we are all Black men who represent majority-white districts (referring to Texas, Utah, and Michigan, respectively.) Tim Scott is the United States senator from South Carolina. South Carolina does have a strong Black population, but it’s a predominantly white state. These are the facts.” America’s three largest cities, New York, Los Angeles and Chicago, all have Black mayors though none of these cities is majority Black. There are many examples of Blacks elected to statewide offices in a country where no state has a majority Black population. These include Sens. Barack Obama, Kamala Harris, Carol Moseley Braun and Cory Booker, as well as Govs. Doug Wilder, Deval Patrick and Wes Moore.


About the 2008 presidential election, Obama’s principal rival for the Democratic nomination was Hillary Clinton. Obama was attempting to become the first Black president, while Clinton was attempting to become the first female president. On the Republican side, the two primary rivals were Mitt Romney, who would become the first Mormon president, and John McCain, who would become at 72 the oldest elected president. In February 2007, Gallup found that 5% of Americans said they “would not vote for” a Black presidential candidate; 11% “would not vote for” a woman; 24% “would not vote for” a Mormon; and 42% “would not vote for” a presidential candidate who is “72 years of age.” So, Obama’s hurdle was the lowest.

As for the Supreme Court, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) calls Republican-appointed jurists “often underqualified or completely unqualified for their role.”

Nothing says qualified quite like a bartender-turned-congressional candidate. And AOC got elected, proving yet again that despite America’s “systemic racism,” there’s hope.

— Larry Elder is a bestselling U.S. author and nationally syndicated radio talk-show host.
 

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,429
4,063
113
Edmonton
Why do the Democrats keep saying that black voters are suppressed from voting? Since when, says who? If I were Black, I'd be insulted as it seems these so-called "white liberals" don't think they can think for themselves much less vote. It's disgusting!!
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,697
8,212
113
B.C.
White Democrats 'will not vote for Black candidates,' says NAACP
Author of the article:Larry Elder
Published Oct 26, 2025 • 3 minute read

Janai Nelson, front, president of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, who was arguing on behalf of a group of Black voters, speaks with media after departing the court, Oct. 15, 2025, in Washington.
Janai Nelson, front, president of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, who was arguing on behalf of a group of Black voters, speaks with media after departing the court, Oct. 15, 2025, in Washington.
The Supreme Court is considering a Louisiana redistricting case that could have a greater impact on U.S House of Representatives seats than the Texas and California “gerrymandering” manoeuvres combined.


The New York Times wrote, “Democrats would be in danger of losing around a dozen majority-minority districts across the South if the court struck down part of the Voting Rights Act.”


White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller tweeted, “How many people just realized that Dems had as many as 20 extra seats based on years of unconstitutional race-based gerrymandering?”

For the purpose of “racial justice” under the Voting Rights Act, Democrat legislatures and politicians created several “majority-minority” districts in order to elect Black and Hispanic congressional members. The Supreme Court will rule on whether these districts violate equal protection under the Constitution.

ACLU Voting Rights Project Director Sophia Lin Lakin, who supports these majority-minority districts, said: “Sec. 2 of the Voting Rights Act has been a critical tool in safeguarding the promise that people of colour can participate in our democracy on equal terms. It has been our shield against discriminatory maps and our answer to laws designed to suppress the vote. Congress passed the Voting Rights Act with overwhelming, bipartisan support — and reauthorized it again and again — because our leaders understood a fundamental truth: you cannot cure discrimination by pretending it doesn’t exist.”


NAACP lawyer Janai Nelson told the court, “It was clear that, regardless of party, white Democrats were not voting for Black candidates whether they were Democrats or not. We know that there is such a significant chasm between how Black and white voters vote in Louisiana that there is no question that even if there is some correlation between race and party, that race is the driving factor.”

The Supreme Court decades ago in Shaw v. Reno (1993) and Miller v. Johnson (1995) ruled against districts where gerrymandering by race was the dominant factor. “Ethnic cleansing!” cried Jesse Jackson after the Miller decision. Elaine Jones of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund said, “The noose is tightening.” Her colleague, Theodore Shaw, warned that once this decision goes through, the Black Congressional Caucus “could meet in the back seat of a taxicab.” But of the Black House members in the four redesigned majority-white Southern districts who decided to run for reelection, three won. One chose not to run.


In 2016, the city of over 100,000 population that most voted for Donald Trump, with 80% of the vote, was Abilene, Texas, a city that is over 75% white. Shortly after Trump’s election, Abilene voted for its first Black mayor. Black Rep. Byron Donalds (R-Fla.) recently said: “Myself, Wesley Hunt, Burgess Owens, John James — we are all Black men who represent majority-white districts (referring to Texas, Utah, and Michigan, respectively.) Tim Scott is the United States senator from South Carolina. South Carolina does have a strong Black population, but it’s a predominantly white state. These are the facts.” America’s three largest cities, New York, Los Angeles and Chicago, all have Black mayors though none of these cities is majority Black. There are many examples of Blacks elected to statewide offices in a country where no state has a majority Black population. These include Sens. Barack Obama, Kamala Harris, Carol Moseley Braun and Cory Booker, as well as Govs. Doug Wilder, Deval Patrick and Wes Moore.


About the 2008 presidential election, Obama’s principal rival for the Democratic nomination was Hillary Clinton. Obama was attempting to become the first Black president, while Clinton was attempting to become the first female president. On the Republican side, the two primary rivals were Mitt Romney, who would become the first Mormon president, and John McCain, who would become at 72 the oldest elected president. In February 2007, Gallup found that 5% of Americans said they “would not vote for” a Black presidential candidate; 11% “would not vote for” a woman; 24% “would not vote for” a Mormon; and 42% “would not vote for” a presidential candidate who is “72 years of age.” So, Obama’s hurdle was the lowest.

As for the Supreme Court, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) calls Republican-appointed jurists “often underqualified or completely unqualified for their role.”

Nothing says qualified quite like a bartender-turned-congressional candidate. And AOC got elected, proving yet again that despite America’s “systemic racism,” there’s hope.

— Larry Elder is a bestselling U.S. author and nationally syndicated radio talk-show host.
Yet whites voted for Obama, twice . Cry me a river .
 
  • Like
Reactions: petros