Why did the Terrorist hit the Twin Towers?

Spocq

Electoral Member
Sep 8, 2008
122
1
18
I'm not saying to open our gates to those who want to harm us. I'm just saying don't torment them. All that we do to torment them adds to their anger making the situation worse. Also all that we do that shows respect will add to making the situation better. I believe the saying, "what we put in we get out", is true. There are many sayings that are similar that support this concept. Being disrespectful doesn't teach others to be respectful it teaches them to be disrespectful. If we want to teach them to be respectful then we need to be respectful.
 

Spocq

Electoral Member
Sep 8, 2008
122
1
18
Actually that last sentence should be:

Being disrespectful doesn't teach/incourage others to be respectful it teaches/incourages them to be disrespectful. If we are respectful towards others we teach/incourage them to be respectful.
 
Last edited:

Scott Free

House Member
May 9, 2007
3,893
46
48
BC
If we are respectful towards others we teach/incourage them to be respectful.

That is true only of children.


Everything I've studied has shown the opposite with adults.

So you'll have to show me some evidence.

Being kind to zealots only encourages them. That has been my experience from when I was one. It is kind to offer a brutal awakening. It was kind to me anyway.
 
Last edited:

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
Why did the Terrorist hit the Twin Towers?

I want to know why the terrorists hit the twin towers. Was it a statement, or more economic.

The reason I ask this, is if they really wanted to effect the United States, they just need to hit 5 locations in Canada and the U.S. would be in a dark age.

2 hydroelectric power dams that supply most of New York Cities power and the east coast of the USA.

3 pipeline locations in Alberta and Sask that supply oil and gas to the United States.

Economic crisis complete.

So what was so significant about the twin towers, when their are other locations easier and would cause more economic damage?

Because they watched too much Fight Club and thought they could destroy the world's credit and drop it to Zero by leveling a few towers......



Seemed like a good idea on paper and in the movies.... but then again, many of them think Rambo could actually hit anything by shooting from the hip and spraying all over the place, thinking Alah would guide their bullets.......

That's one other theory of course.
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
If the terrorists had struck Canada, sure the US would suffer, but only to a minor degree, and then it would be forgotten.

Terrorism is psychological - hit somebody at home, when they're comfortable, and destroy their world. There are thousands of kids in NYC who are still traumatized by the idea that one of their parents went to work, just like always, and never came home. There are adults who now won't work in skyscrapers, because they're terrified.

It was a masterful ploy, to destroy the iconic towers that were a classic symbol of the NYC skyline, and the center of much of the financial world, and to make it such a psychological hit. It was such a blow to the psyche of the US that to this day, there are thousands of people who believe it was an inside job - and this belief is part of the coping mechanism - it's far easier to believe it was an inside job, than to accept how vulnerable you are.

Oh I'm fully aware of how vulnerable we all are at any given time at any given place.... but I do have some slight skepticism in regards to Bush's involvement in it in some manner or another.....

I mean seriously..... buckets of warnings, clues and hints about the attack, when, where and by who were all over the place months before it happened..... and yet nothing was done...... either that was complete incompetence or it was involvement.

I'm not leaning one way or another at this time, and I'm not stating I believe in any paticular conspiracies..... but given the known information and evidence at this time..... neither can be ruled out.

I do fully believe that the Al'Q had their hands involved into this, and that Osama had some level of involvement...... but I also believe that Bush, although can be quite stupid on more occasions then not, had some part to play in this.

Either that or he's completely retarded and incompetent........
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
Finally!!!!! Somebody speak my language!!!!!!

Also think do you that US government wanted part of to see the US homeland a attack it's own against people? :-|

Depends on the motive..... the US Government doesn't seem to have an issue of sending thousands of US soldiers to their deaths in a war that shouldn't have existed in the first place..... what makes you think they care about their civilians any differently?

Mind you, I am basing this on observations of action, not speculation, since the above is true...... they have yet to prove otherwise.
 

Nuggler

kind and gentle
Feb 27, 2006
11,596
141
63
Backwater, Ontario.
:cool:Why did the Terrorist hit the Twin Towers?


Fortunately, since "he" vaporized, along with many thousands of UNFORTUNATE INNOCENTS, we will never know why "he" decided to fly, come along, navigate, the jet(s). (whomever "he" was)

A good bet would be, many Islamics pissed off at US foreign policy. But, that's just a short shot at it.

Do some reading for Christ's sake, it's all out there. Volumes have been written.

Quit trolling, stirring, and read instead.

WHY.......is the sky blue???
WHY...............did the chicken cross the road??
WHY...............were the Bin Ladens given take off permission and the rest of the skys kept empty, following 9/11??
Makes as much sense.




 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
That is true only of children.

Everything I've studied has shown the opposite with adults.

So you'll have to show me some evidence.

Being kind to zealots only encourages them. That has been my experience from when I was one. It is kind to offer a brutal awakening. It was kind to me anyway.

The first step is to understand why they maybe angry or wish to harm us.... what was the cause for them to direct their attention our way? What have we done to them to cause such hatred?

If nothing, then I can understand your position..... but you should be well aware that we are not innocent in this situation and some in our western worlds have on occasion, screwed them over, taken what we wanted, attempted to assemilate them, treat them as a lower level of human, helped establish oppressive dictators over them that suit our needs.... and so on and so forth.

Treating others with respect and being kind to others does pay off..... when you actually follow the practice as it should be followed.

It works both ways and we are not as innocent as many here would like to think we are.

Are they justified in their actions against us in regards to "Terrorist Attacks" and fighting us in Iraq/Afghanistan? On some level of mentality, yes..... while on many others, no.

Are we justified in invading Afghanistan and Iraq, displacing millions, killing hundreds/thousands in air strikes, forcing a totally different way of life on them yet again?

On some level of mentality, yes..... while on many others, no.

This is the conundrum we are all currently in..... each side feels they are justified in their actions based on previous offenses against them..... it's for retribution and revenge against those who have harmed us.

Keep it this way and it will never end..... hatred will always continue......

We should all be fully aware that you can not completely kill off the Taliban or the Al'Q..... just as they should be fully aware that they can not completely kill off all of us and our way of life.

It's simply a deadlock in which we are all guilty on some level or another for this situation, Us and them.

Many people have said in the past that "There is no substitute for Victory" and I completely disagree with that..... the best substitute for victory..... the thing that is much better then Victory..... is peace.

Peace Is Victory..... but when you use Victory to justify wiping out an entire culture or way of life..... that's not victory..... that's being a war monger and oppressive for your own selfish gains.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
The Ultimate 9/11 'Truth' Showdown
David Ray Griffin vs. Matt Taibbi


Global Research, October 7, 2008
AlterNet.org

A poll of 17 countries that came out September of this year revealed that majorities in only nine of them "believe that al Qaeda was behind the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the United States." A Zogby poll from 2006 found that in America, 42% of respondents believed the US government and 9/11 Commission "covered up" the events of 9/11. It's safe to say that at least tens of millions of Americans don't believe anything close to the official account offered by the 9/11 Commission, and that much of the outside world remains skeptical.
Over the years, AlterNet has run dozens of stories, mostly critical, of the 9/11 Truth Movement. Matt Taibbi has taken on the 9/11 Truth Movement head on in a series of articles, and most recently in his new book, The Great Derangement.
In April, I asked Taibbi if he would be interested in interviewing David Ray Griffin, a leading member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice, Emeritus Professor of Philosophy of Religion and Theology at Claremont School of Theology and Claremont Graduate University and author of seven of books on 9/11, about his recent book, 9/11 Contradictions. After months of back and forths between them and some editorial delays, I'm pleased to share their written exchange -- all 24,000 words of it. What we have here are the preeminent writers on both sides of the 9/11 Truth argument; a one-of-a-kind debate. Because the questions and responses are quite long, I've woven them together in order. Enjoy. -- Jan Frel, AlterNet Senior Editor.

"It's very long but a very excellent execution of a chronic debunker, the man is flayed alive by Griffin in the most competent way. People who doubt the fact that 9/11 was an inside job have very little in the way of a future not filled with compromise of principles." DB

 
Last edited:

Scott Free

House Member
May 9, 2007
3,893
46
48
BC
The first step is to understand why they maybe angry or wish to harm us.... what was the cause for them to direct their attention our way? What have we done to them to cause such hatred?

If nothing, then I can understand your position..... but you should be well aware that we are not innocent in this situation and some in our western worlds have on occasion, screwed them over, taken what we wanted, attempted to assemilate them, treat them as a lower level of human, helped establish oppressive dictators over them that suit our needs.... and so on and so forth.

You are attempting to use a straw man fallacy against me.

I am hard on the irrationality inherent in religion. The more irrational it gets the harder on it I get. I do this out of direct personal experience having known a great many zealots in my time. Faith must be directly challenged because that is the only thing that shakes its foundations. It is not a coincidence that such confrontation brings out violent acts; it does so because it challenges the ludicrous beliefs but do not think for one moment not confronting zealotry will prevent violence because that will only encourage zealotry and thereby further limit what you can say (or do).

As for your statement: yes, we (the west) have done a lot of bad things to people in the third world. Yes, people need something to live for. Yes, freedom and liberty of all people should be respected. I have never ever said otherwise.

"Religion is an insult to human dignity. With or without it, you'd have good people doing good things and evil people doing bad things, but for good people to do bad things, it takes religion." ~ Steven Weinberg,


Treating others with respect and being kind to others does pay off..... when you actually follow the practice as it should be followed.

Not when it comes to zealots. They treat you only as they were commanded to.

"One is often told that it is a very wrong thing to attack religion, because religion makes men virtuous. So I am told; I have not noticed it." ~ Bertrand Russell


It works both ways and we are not as innocent as many here would like to think we are.

Straw man, I never maintained our innocence.

Are they justified in their actions against us in regards to "Terrorist Attacks" and fighting us in Iraq/Afghanistan? On some level of mentality, yes..... while on many others, no.

"The god of the cannibals will be a cannibal, of the crusaders a crusader, and of the merchants a merchant." ~ Ralph Waldo Emerson

The god of terrorists will be a terrorist.

Are we justified in invading Afghanistan and Iraq, displacing millions, killing hundreds/thousands in air strikes, forcing a totally different way of life on them yet again?

Straw man, I never said the west was. I have opposed the Iraq war from day one.

"The god... of the crusaders [is] a crusader" ibid

On some level of mentality, yes..... while on many others, no.

There might have been a reason for Afghanistan but when bin Laden escaped we should have left. Even there I have my doubts. He clearly denied he had anything to do with 9/11. The American evidence against him is poor to say the least. I'm certain bin Laden would have owned up to 9/11 had it been him who did it; terrorists do seem to like taking credit for things.

This is the conundrum we are all currently in..... each side feels they are justified in their actions based on previous offenses against them..... it's for retribution and revenge against those who have harmed us.

I feel no need to impose such gross violations of liberty such as war on anyone. That was a crusader war brought on by yet another religious nut case.

I feel only the need to challenge head on the challenges brought onto me.

Keep it this way and it will never end..... hatred will always continue......

Man is the religious animal. He is the only religious animal. He is the only animal that has the True Religion -— several of them. He is the only animal that loves his neighbor as himself and cuts his throat, if his theology isn't straight. He has made a graveyard of the globe in trying his honest best to smooth his brother's path to happiness and heaven. ~ Mark Twain

We should all be fully aware that you can not completely kill off the Taliban or the Al'Q..... just as they should be fully aware that they can not completely kill off all of us and our way of life.

Nonsense. The Taliban can only exist in an environment of profound ignorance. If we made education a priority in Afghanistan it could be stomped out within a generation.

It's simply a deadlock in which we are all guilty on some level or another for this situation, Us and them.

Agreed, the terrorist v.s. the crusader.

Many people have said in the past that "There is no substitute for Victory" and I completely disagree with that..... the best substitute for victory..... the thing that is much better then Victory..... is peace.

You do not understand the religious mind then. When you have any large group of people that think they are the masters - the chosen among men - you will never have peace no matter how appeasing you become.

Peace Is Victory..... but when you use Victory to justify wiping out an entire culture or way of life..... that's not victory..... that's being a war monger and oppressive for your own selfish gains.

Straw man again, I never said to wipe anyone out. That would be ludicrous.

What I said is that I will challenge their beliefs in a brutal fashion.
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
You are attempting to use a straw man fallacy against me.

I'm not using straws for anything..... I stated very obvious questions which can help to understand just about any situation in life, and I pointed out the fact that we as a western society, or in more detail, our governments have done plenty of things to them to not make us as so innocent as some may want to believe.

You can call it whatever you want to.... I call it basic truth without going into excessive detailing. If you want the details, start digging up a bunch of threads and reports to better understand the situation.

I am hard on the irrationality inherent in religion. The more irrational it gets the harder on it I get. I do this out of direct personal experience having known a great many zealots in my time. Faith must be directly challenged because that is the only thing that shakes its foundations. It is not a coincidence that such confrontation brings out violent acts; it does so because it challenges the ludicrous beliefs but do not think for one moment not confronting zealotry will prevent violence because that will only encourage zealotry and thereby further limit what you can say (or do).

Although there may appear that there is nothing but irrationality within most, if not all, religions..... there is a level of rationality none the less.... one only has to listen and understand. You don't have to agree with their rationality and you very well could be offended by it.... but if you are willing to understand it and meet on level ground to meet their concerns, the progress can be made. When nobody is listening, nobody is taking you seriously, and you are branded the evilest thing on the planet, extremist actions can usually be the only or last resort for many to take, because that seems to be the only way people will listen to you.

Eventually the reasons and motives for going down this route get lost and all that is focused on are the evil things done.... which in a way is fair..... but it's easy to forget what started it all in the first place.

So if you don't know how the situation started.... how do you know how to finish it?

As for your statement: yes, we (the west) have done a lot of bad things to people in the third world. Yes, people need something to live for. Yes, freedom and liberty of all people should be respected. I have never ever said otherwise.

"Religion is an insult to human dignity. With or without it, you'd have good people doing good things and evil people doing bad things, but for good people to do bad things, it takes religion." ~ Steven Weinberg,

And he's wrong.... as I know of plenty of people who don't follow religion who still do some pretty nasty things...... Religion or lack of has nothing to do with what people can and will do. Of course many wars throughout time have been started based on religious reasoning..... but many others haven't.

His quote is a blanket statement, and I know of plenty of religions which are none violent.

Not when it comes to zealots. They treat you only as they were commanded to.

When you treat them with absolutes, they respond with absolute actions. There are extremist and moderates in many religions..... but what causes people to join the extremist parts?

If you don't focus on the causes and roots, then you'll never solve the problem.

Thinking that extremist can not be negotiated or talked to is narrow minded as I see it.

Straw man, I never maintained our innocence.

I was speaking in general, not towards anything that you said.

"The god of the cannibals will be a cannibal, of the crusaders a crusader, and of the merchants a merchant." ~ Ralph Waldo Emerson

The god of terrorists will be a terrorist.

Out of all the different factions of each religion, you can not generalize like the above quote or as you just put it. Many people have their own interpretations of what rules and guidelines should be followed in their relgion, and just because one group stands out more then others, doesn't make them more popular, nor does it make their beliefs the right ones for that religion.

This is the main problem.... generalizations..... when you throw an entire spectrum of beliefs into one group, then don't expect anything good to come out of it.

You just said in a previous post about the differences between adults and children..... well when you treat a child in a negative manner, they react in a negative manner..... when you treat a group of people in a negative manner, they will react in a negative manner.

Straw man, I never said the west was. I have opposed the Iraq war from day one.

It is not a straw, because that was also general question to anybody, not specifically yourself. It was a point to elaborate on the rest of what I was explaining. I didn't claim you said anything like what I just said..... I asked a question.

There might have been a reason for Afghanistan but when bin Laden escaped we should have left. Even there I have my doubts. He clearly denied he had anything to do with 9/11.

Which I also agree apon, since there has been recorded documents and reports very shortly after the attack that he claimed he had nothing to do with it..... if he did, why would he deny his involvement, only to later brag about it on questionable audio tapes filtered by the US due to National Security? (Another general question not directed towards you.)

The American evidence against him is poor to say the least.

Agreed....

I'm certain bin Laden would have owned up to 9/11 had it been him who did it; terrorists do seem to like taking credit for things.

Agreed.... which is also why I have great doubts on those so-called audio tapes..... why would he make public comments via video (Which were filtered and much of it blocked by the US) then all of a sudden everything else is just on audio..... which could be anybody who's good at acting?

None of it adds up. To me.... the reason why they are extremist and now going after Western forces is because they got pinned the bad guys based on crap evidence....... which is where I come from the position that they had ligit reasons to take the actions they now are taking, due to the child explination used above.

But to think we can not toss out the idiots who lied to us and put us into the position we currently are in, and open talks with them to resolve this current mess in the world, simply because of what we have been told about their religious beliefs is narrow viewed imo.

That's the only real point I'm trying to make.

I feel no need to impose such gross violations of liberty such as war on anyone. That was a crusader war brought on by yet another religious nut case.

Indeed..... in my view, based on the factual evidence provided, regardless of whoever was behind the attack in New York, Bush started this religious crap...... they are reacting based on defense. Bush told them to hand over Bin Ladin..... they probably knew what would have happened to him and they had their own questions on what happened, so they didn't...... so now we have one big open war on everybody the US doesn't like..... .and I'm personally pissed off that we're a part of it.

I also find it interesting that this war was planned prior to 9/11 by the Bush administration due to the Taliban rejecting their desire to have a pipline pass through afghanistan for their own profits and greed....... then there's the whole oil grab from Iraq.... which doesn't seem to be working either.

But that doesn't mean this war crap has only one solution, AKA: entire distruction of one side or another. I feel we have to own up to our own responsibilities, correct the mistakes we have made, punish those who have done wrong and set things straight....... then can some form of real peace be made.

So long as we allow leaders like Bush and assoc. stay in power and get away with bloody murder for money and greed, and so long as they see this continuing, they will continue to fight....... and unfortunatly, so will we...... the problem is, the longer this goes on, the more clouded the original reasons become, and then eventually everybody is going to forget what started all this crap and just remember the propaganda.

Man is the religious animal. He is the only religious animal. He is the only animal that has the True Religion -— several of them. He is the only animal that loves his neighbor as himself and cuts his throat, if his theology isn't straight. He has made a graveyard of the globe in trying his honest best to smooth his brother's path to happiness and heaven. ~ Mark Twain

Just so you know.... I'm not a religious follower either.... but I do hold respect for most of their principles, and I'm not afraid to shoot my mouth off when I feel they have done wrong.

In order to understand where we are going, we have to understand where we've been.....

Nonsense. The Taliban can only exist in an environment of profound ignorance. If we made education a priority in Afghanistan it could be stomped out within a generation.

It could be. Then again, any religion can only exist in an environment of ignorance..... why else has the US cut back so much on their education systems and now seem to have a larger religious following then they did about a decade ago?

This can be applied to all religions depending. When you don't understand something, you turn to relgion for the answers.

I'm not saying the Taliban are wonderful people..... but I see very little difference in their rule in Afghanistan compared to say Iran...... should we rush in there and change their entire way of life to suit what we think is right?

They have plenty of executions and they follow muslim traditions.... many of which do not agree with our way of life...... and yet, I don't see us trying to take them out.

Possibly due to their military power in comparison to the Taliban's in Afghanistan, but it also could be because of how developed and functioning their nation is.

Just because some people don't follow our way of life and just because they hold to beliefs we may not completely understand, doesn't make them monsters or enemies. I bet on the flip side, if you lived their lives in their cultures, fed their media much like how we're fed our media..... you'd probably hate our guts too.

Straw? Nope.... just common sense applied to relation..... not to mention viewing their own media reports, their people's personal opinions and views on us, and comparing the differences. Propaganda exists everywhere.

Agreed, the terrorist v.s. the crusader.

Indeed.... but the Terrorist and Cursader changes when you view it from their side. On their side of things, they're Holy Warriors vs. Forign Occupiers..... pretty much the same thing as I see it..... they're called terrorists, because it works..... they're also called terrorists because their tactics arn't you're standard military tactics.

^ Which I find pretty funny, because it was the US who labeled them Terrorists because of these tactics..... when during the Revolutionary War, the US used Guerilla Tactics against the British, rather then lining up at 10 feet and getting shot..... to the British.... they were terrorists and denied POW status when captured.

Now the shoe is on the other foot, the US didn't learn anything, and now they're doing exactly what they fought against.

The US used these tactics because they were out gunned and out numbered...... The Taliban/Al'Q are also out numbered.... or at least out gunned..... the US knew they wouldn't win against the British if they fought on their grounds...... the Taliban/Al'Q know they won't win against us if they fight on our grounds.

To me, the entire situation is so hypocritical it's sad.

You do not understand the religious mind then. When you have any large group of people that think they are the masters - the chosen among men - you will never have peace no matter how appeasing you become.

That depends on who you're talking to.... .it also depends on who you're getting your information from.

Straw man again, I never said to wipe anyone out. That would be ludicrous.

Once again, not a straw, it was a general question. I never said you said that.

What I said is that I will challenge their beliefs in a brutal fashion.

Then expect to get a continuing brutal response.

Remember the child anology.
 

Scott Free

House Member
May 9, 2007
3,893
46
48
BC
I was speaking in general, not towards anything that you said.

I didn't realize that. My apologizes then, I over reacted.

I think we're pretty much in agreement with most things actually.

My reaction to religion comes from two sources:

First, I was religious and come from a fanatically religious family. My parents told me not to talk about things that were not religious because anything else didn't matter. I was threatened that if I were not this religion I would be thrown out of the family. I was never taught unconditional love. People only love you for what you can bring them and this goes for god too, is what I was told. It's a pretty big mind ****. So like an ex-smoker can over react to cigarettes I may over react to religion. It is a self defence mechanism. I don't think it's an over reaction but then I wouldn't would I?

Second, I have direct experience with fanaticism. I know the cold fire in a fanatics eyes and I understand what sociologists mean by the term. I understand how psychopathic these people are. I think it is a difficult thing to realize because they can seem so loving and caring. But they are disassociated and live in their own worlds.

To treat them (fanatics) any other way except in a brutal head on fashion will only serve to confirm their faith and will not shake their belief. I'm not talking about religious people in general or moderates but the zealots. Unfortunately though it is from the moderates that zealotry begins and I do feel justified in confronting that too as a result. For example, I have read comments where some religious people have wondered that god had not killed me yet. It is that psychopathy that I hit head on.

I react too because I know these Islamic and Christian and whatever else fanatics often have children and I shutter to think of the hell those children are living. Worse only 1 in 12 will ever escape. I've been there and it is extreemly terrible though most don't realize it :-(

The pattern has to be broken - shattered even. There is no gentle way of doing it. You can't keep wild tigers and lions from eating you by being nice to them, eventually they will eat you. That is what zealots are except worse; they are the most dangerous animals of all.

So there, probably more information than I wanted to give and more than you wanted to hear. ;-)
 

CriticalUnity

New Member
Sep 21, 2008
24
1
3
Canada
criticalunity.org
Why are some of them still alive, (impossible) & one of their passports magically was able to fly out a window with burning flames, & was still intact...

- It is not to create an economic crisis; That is being done by the federal reserve, whom shareholders are private companies.