Obama urges political fix in Iraq

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7519411.stm

US Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama has said security in Iraq has improved but the country's needs must now be addressed politically.


The Illinois senator was speaking in Amman, Jordan, in the first news conference of his trip abroad.

Earlier, Mr Obama held talks with Sunni tribal leaders in the western Iraqi province of Anbar.

After meeting Jordan's King Abdullah, Mr Obama was expected to travel on to Israel.

In Amman, Mr Obama said of Iraq: "There is security progress, but now we need a political solution."

He repeated his goal of withdrawing US combat troops from Iraq within 16 months should he become president.

However, he said he would consult with military commanders to determine how many troops to keep in the country to protect humanitarian operations, to train Iraqis and to conduct operations against al-Qaeda in Iraq.

Mr Obama also condemned an attack carried out by a Palestinian man using a mechanical digger in Jerusalem on Tuesday, and said he would always support Israel in "confronting terrorism".

Withdrawal timetables
In Anbar, Mr Obama met militiamen of the US-backed Awakening Councils movement - a tribal alliance whose members turned against al-Qaeda last year.


Ahmed Abu Risha, head of the Awakening Councils, said tribal chiefs had told Mr Obama at their meeting in Ramadi that any withdrawal of US forces from Anbar should be carried out cautiously.

On Monday, Mr Obama, part of a US congressional delegation, met Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Maliki in Baghdad.

Mr Maliki told Mr Obama and other US senators on Monday that he hoped US troops could be withdrawn from Iraq by 2010, a goal not too distant from Mr Obama's.

Republican presidential hopeful John McCain said that Mr Obama had been "completely wrong" to press for withdrawal timetables, the Associated Press news agency reported.
"When you win wars, troops come home," he said.

So in other words... stay the course. I mean.... wtf does he considder a victory in this situation? This war can not be won by guns alone..... of course if he wasn't locked away from society as a POW for so long, he might have learned that by now.

The Bush administration is committed to removing US troops from Iraq only when it determines that conditions on the ground allow it.
However, last week, the US and Iraqi governments agreed to include a "general time horizon" for troop withdrawal in a long-term security deal currently being discussed.

Pssh.... "No We Refuse to plan any withdraw of our troops... that's just foolish. But we will plan a general time horizon for troop withdrawl."

Which is the same damn thing.... just less accurate. :roll:
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
71
Saint John, N.B.
He (Obama) repeated his goal of withdrawing US combat troops from Iraq within 16 months should he become president.

However, he said he would consult with military commanders to determine how many troops to keep in the country to protect humanitarian operations, to train Iraqis and to conduct operations against al-Qaeda in Iraq.




Now, please explain how this is any different from the stance of McCain........just McCain speaks plainly, Obama oils it pretty thoroughly.
 

scratch

Senate Member
May 20, 2008
5,658
22
38


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7519411.stm



So in other words... stay the course. I mean.... wtf does he considder a victory in this situation? This war can not be won by guns alone..... of course if he wasn't locked away from society as a POW for so long, he might have learned that by now.



Pssh.... "No We Refuse to plan any withdraw of our troops... that's just foolish. But we will plan a general time horizon for troop withdrawl."

Which is the same damn thing.... just less accurate. :roll:

Gawd, this guy is already speaking the way POTUS does and he hasn't been elected. Ominous and dangerous!
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
71
Saint John, N.B.
Gawd, this guy is already speaking the way POTUS does and he hasn't been elected. Ominous and dangerous!

Once again, please explain any significant difference between the stance of Obama the stance of McCain........

Here's a hint.

McCain speaks plainly, Obama oils it pretty thoroughly, so he can slither around with ease.

That's the only difference.

Read back, and show how I am mistaken.
 

scratch

Senate Member
May 20, 2008
5,658
22
38
Once again, please explain any significant difference between the stance of Obama the stance of McCain........

Here's a hint.

McCain speaks plainly, Obama oils it pretty thoroughly, so he can slither around with ease.

That's the only difference.

Read back, and show how I am mistaken.

We speak the same language!