Astronomy and the quran

eanassir

Time Out
Jul 26, 2007
3,099
9
38
Earth rotation around itself is quicker than Moon rotation around it.

Just the facts,
The difference in the example I mentioned is only that: Earth rotates around itself quicker (in 24 hours) than the rotation of Moon around the Earth (in 29 and a half of our days); this will enble all the inhabitnts of Earth to see the same face of Moon; i.e. the same face of Moon will not be fixed to a certain point of Earth, but the Earth will rotate around itself in 24 hours letting people on its whole surface viewing the same face of Moon; the other side they cannot see; because Moon does not rotate around itself.
 

eanassir

Time Out
Jul 26, 2007
3,099
9
38
The rings of Saturn are only a rainbow phenomenon.

The rings of Saturn are a rainbow phenomenon

The rings of Saturn are a rainbow phenomenon: it is due to the light dispersion into its components by passing through some ice or water particles, like the rainbow that sometimes appears after the rain, and like the halo of the Moon.
The colors in the halo of the Moon is not so distinct and clear like in the common rainbow that we sometimes see following rain; similarly the colors of the rings of Saturn are less intense because of the far distance.
It seems that Saturn lies at some angle from Earth, more suitable for such a phenomenon to be more prominent with Saturn than the other planets; even the rings of Neptune are not so clear like those of Saturn.
The rings of Saturn, one time are clearly obvious, and other times less clearly obvious, according to the position of Saturn from Earth, as each of them goes along in its orbit around the Sun; and may be that its angle with Earth changes in each position.
As the Sunrays light is dispersed into its components when it passes through the ice or water particles in the atmosphere of a planet, and this planet being at a certain angle with Earth, the rings will appear in relation to that planet.
It indicates that Saturn (and Neptune) has abundant water in its atmosphere, and so life does exist there on Saturn. God – be exalted – said in the Quran, 21: 30

وَجَعَلْنَا مِنَ الْمَاء كُلَّ شَيْءٍ حَيٍّ أَفَلَا يُؤْمِنُونَ

The explanation: (and [We] made – of water – every living thing? So would they believe?)
Click on:
The planets are inhabited
An anticipated meeting between the inhabitants of Earth and the inhabitants of some other planets
As the light disperses across some part of the atmosphere of Saturn, these color layers will include a large number of meteorites: small and large that orbit around Saturn, as do they orbit around Earth and other planets.
This is confirmed by noticing that these rings are wide and flat but very thin. They are different in color, but they are generally faint; because of being far away. The halo of Moon have more intense colors, and the rainbow, that we see after rain, has still more intense colors depending on the distance of each of Saturn, Moon and the atmosphere of Earth respectively.
The difference between the halo of the Moon and the Rings of Saturn, is that the halo occurs as the light passes through the atmosphere of the Earth, whereas the Rings of Saturn occur as the light passes through the atmosphere of Saturn itself; i.e. the light dispersion that forms the halo occurs in the Earth atmosphere, while the light dispersion that forms the Rings of Saturn occurs in the atmosphere of Saturn itself.
eanassir
http://universeandquran.741.com
 
Last edited:

eanassir

Time Out
Jul 26, 2007
3,099
9
38
Some hints about Pluto a moon of Neptune.

There could be some mistakes in the calculations made by Astronomers; they are not infallible; see this example:
A group of scientists working with NASA
(
Clancy, K. B.; Elliot, J. L.; Person, M. J.; Bosh, A. S.; Buie, M. W.; Dunham, E. W.; Wasserman, L. H.; Levine, S. E.; Stone, R. C.) said at the end of their research:
" This implies either an incorrect Charon to Pluto mass ratio (0.12 was used to calculate the ephemeris), or that we used incorrect Pluto-Charon light ratios in this reduction"
See: Google search: Pluto position
The Position of Pluto Relative to its Ephemeris
Pluto's position in these frames was determined relative to a UCAC astrometric reference network (Zacharias et al., 2000, AJ 120, 2131), with a dual-source ...
adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002AAS...201.6107C -


I mention this as an example that mistakes may occur in any mathematical problem especially if the initial steps are not correct, and then there will be a great variation in the result the mathematical problem.

Here are some hints, which may let us think about the subject:
  • Pluto has a "highly elliptical orbit, and at a tilt of 17 degrees relative to the plane of the ecliptic, which is much more than any of the other planets."
  • "Pluto’s orbit lies inside that of Neptune’s (the 8th planet) during certain parts of its travel around the sun (for e.g. from 1979 to 1999)"
  • "Triton (a moon of Neptune) and Pluto are very similar, it is believed that Triton was in fact an independent entity like Pluto but was captured by Neptune!"
  • "Charon does not actually revolve around Pluto; the two of them orbit around a common centre of mass (their barycentre)."
 

Cobalt_Kid

Council Member
Feb 3, 2007
1,760
17
38
Pluto
The discovery of these large KBOs in similar orbits to Pluto led many to conclude that, bar its relative size, Pluto was not particularly different from other members of the Kuiper belt. Not only did these objects approach Pluto in size, but many also possessed satellites, and were of similar composition (methane and carbon monoxide have been found both on Pluto and on the largest KBOs[4]). Ceres was considered a planet before the discovery of its fellow asteroids, and, based on this precedent, many astronomers concluded that Pluto should also be reclassified.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuiper_belt
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
"Triton (a moon of Neptune) and Pluto are very similar, it is believed that Triton was in fact an independent entity like Pluto but was captured by Neptune!"

That is great. As soon as Pluto is captured by Neptune, it will be a moon of that planet. Until then Pluto will remain a Dwarf Planet and satellite of our sun.
 

eanassir

Time Out
Jul 26, 2007
3,099
9
38
It's Bush's fault!

The pictures that are recently taken for Mars are only computer mediated through a certain program; they are not direct photographs taken by personal camera. The program is defective, and the pictures are not precise; therefore a large dark area may be a large city for example or a forest or something like that. There is life on Mars; their rover is only wandering about in the desert of Mars covered by sandstorms; one time falling in a valley and another time climbing some rocks.

See our website:
And click on http://universeandquran.741.com/#Planets Inhabited (The planets are inhabited)
http://universeandquran.741.com/new_page_2.htm#Meeting Between Inhabitants
An anticipated meeting between the inhabitants of Earth and the inhabitants of some other planets

eanassir
 

eanassir

Time Out
Jul 26, 2007
3,099
9
38
That is great. As soon as Pluto is captured by Neptune, it will be a moon of that planet. Until then Pluto will remain a Dwarf Planet and satellite of our sun.

I surprise that some, pertaining to science, may hold fast to some postulations, and upon such foundations they build their certain belief. Who could prove such a thing that they say? They say for example that billions of years ago such and such had happened in the centre of the universe; when they in fact do not know what is now happening in the next street?
eanassir.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
Here are some hints, which may let us think about the subject:
  • Pluto has a "highly elliptical orbit, and at a tilt of 17 degrees relative to the plane of the ecliptic, which is much more than any of the other planets."
  • "Pluto’s orbit lies inside that of Neptune’s (the 8th planet) during certain parts of its travel around the sun (for e.g. from 1979 to 1999)"
  • "Triton (a moon of Neptune) and Pluto are very similar, it is believed that Triton was in fact an independent entity like Pluto but was captured by Neptune!"
  • "Charon does not actually revolve around Pluto; the two of them orbit around a common centre of mass (their barycentre)."
And the clear implication of all of those "hints" is that Pluto's orbit is around the sun, not Neptune. The third one even says directly it's an independent entity, not a moon of Neptune, and the fourth one is true of all mutually orbiting bodies. The moon and the earth also revolve around their barycentre, for instance, which happens to be inside the earth, but not at the earth's centre. You still don't know what you're talking about.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
Who could prove such a thing that they say? They say for example that billions of years ago such and such had happened in the centre of the universe; when they in fact do not know what is now happening in the next street?
What kind of silly logic is that? What possible connection is there between knowing what's happening in the next street and knowing what's happening somewhere out in the cosmos? And the universe, by the way, has no centre.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
Tell me then why do the earthquakes follow the total eclipse in the regions that see such an eclipse?
Don't be any sillier than you can avoid. There's no relationship between eclipses and earthquakes.
Tell me then why is there two tides and two ebbs in 24 hours?
Because there's a tidal bulge on both sides of the planet, not just the one facing the moon. See if you can puzzle out why that should be so. (Hint: think of how the force of gravity diminishes with distance.)
The pictures that are recently taken for Mars are only computer mediated through a certain program; they are not direct photographs taken by personal camera. The program is defective, and the pictures are not precise; therefore a large dark area may be a large city for example or a forest or something like that.
I see you know less than nothing about signal processing too. Any digital image, even one from a personal camera, has been mediated by software, and even in the cheapest cameras it's generally pretty good. You have no evidence that the software used to process images from the Mars rovers is defective or that the pictures are not precise. If you can prove that claim, maybe you'd better tell NASA or JPL or somebody else who can do something about it. That stuff was put together by some of the best scientific and engineering minds on the planet, and you think you know things they don't about it?

Your ignorance is vast and hopeless eanassir, and will remain so as long as you think 1500-year old religious texts must be scientifically accurate. Your dogmatic and erroneous certainty in the face of all the evidence you've been given in multiple threads correcting you about Pluto being a moon of Neptune and the Moon and Venus not rotating on their axes does you no credit. You are simply and completely wrong.
 

eanassir

Time Out
Jul 26, 2007
3,099
9
38
The mistake of Astronomers about comets.

The mistake of Astronomers about comets
In the year 1705 the Astronomer Halley brought about his theory about the comet, and since then Astronomers started to orbit around Halley and his theory.​
He discovered a comet, which was called to his name, and said it was similar to the description of a comet that had come 76 years before. He said mostly this is the same comet that has come now, and it is expected to come 76 years later; because it orbits around the sun.​
Then they investigated the light spectrum, and found Na, Oxygen and Hydrogen, and some combinations of such elements in the tail of the comets, and they said another theory that the comet includes water in the form of ice and dust: a dirty ice in the inside of the comet head or body!
Then others said there is a jet propulsion phenomenon of the water vapor that makes the tail more prominent!​
I say: this is very surprising how people believe about something, even though it is very strange; that is because it was told to them by a famous scientist; while if you or I tell them more reasonable ideas, they will laugh at it, then will ridicule you, then will transgress on you with non-ethical words, and quarrel with you (it may be that in case you are present with them, there may be boxing and kicking); but certainly this is not a scientific way of considering things.​
The Arab say to their guest: "There has been food and salt between us and you"; they mean they have been friends and have together eaten of the same food and drink. But I say there has been mocking and shouting between us, friends.​

Now, Halley and other scientists said: it is most probably, and most likely; but others who came after them took it as most certainly and absolutely.
After the discovery of Kuiper belt, some scientists said that the comets came from this belt.​

What is the comet?
·The comet is a fire mass thrown out of the sun, following some local solar explosions, resulting in the hurling or shooting of such sparks or fire masses.

God – be exalted – said in the Quran, 77: 32-34
[FONT=&quot](إنّها تَرْمِي بِشَرَرٍ كَالقَصْرِ . كَأنّهُ جِمالَتٌ صُفْرٌ . وَيْلٌ يَوْمَئذٍ لِلمُكَذِّبِينَ . )[/FONT]
The explanation: (32- It [: Hell] shoots sparks like the castle.​
33- As it might be yellow thick ropes [of ships.]​
34- Woe, on that day, to the deniers [of the Judgment Day.])​
The interpretation:
-- Hell is the sun,​
-- (shoots sparks like the castle) means: the size of each one of these sparks which Hell or the sun throws out in the space is like the size of one of some large constructed palaces or castles; and its sparks, in fact, are the comets. For this reason God -be exalted – said [FONT=&quot]كَأنّهُ جِمالَتٌ صُفْرٌ[/FONT] i.e. (As it might be yellow thick ropes [of ships.]); i.e. like the yellow stays of ships. God – be exalted – simulated the long tails of comets to the [long thick yellow] ropes of the ship.​

  • The comet does not orbit the Sun, but goes on wandering about in the space.
  • They are oblong objects, not spherical like the planets and moons, and they do not rotate around themselves, neither do they rotate around the Sun, but they move along wandering about in the space.
  • They are relatively small objects, and will get colder by time, and their heads may then become a group of hot rocks.
  • They are more numerous than what one may think, but most of them are hiding and invisible; because of their relatively small volumes and particular sort of movement.
  • The tail following the head of the comet, being attracted to it by gravitation. The tail does not propel the comet, and there is no jet propulsion; on the contrary, sometimes the tail is in front of the head. The tail direction is always away from the sun.
  • The comet is very hot and flaming; its tail may include water vapor, but there is no ice in the comet.
  • The comet has affinity to the cold and freezing regions of the Earth (and other planets), and has repulsion with the hot objects like the Sun.
  • When a comet falls on the ground, it will melt the stone and dig in the surface to be buried under the ground; this is in comparison with the meteorite which when falls, will remain above the ground. Usually, the falling comet will lead to the formation of a crater. Its falling will cause burns, storms and quaking of the earth, and will destroy a wide area.
  • Life did not come to the Earth embedded in the comets, but in the meteorites; because comets are flaming objects, and fire kills the living cells.
For more information about the comets refer to our website:​
And make some clicks on:​

[FONT=&quot]eanassir.[/FONT]
 

eanassir

Time Out
Jul 26, 2007
3,099
9
38
The Fire to which God promised the idolators and those who associate others with Him is three kinds:
1. the volcano fire: immediately following death; the souls of those associaters and those who see the apostles and talk with them then deny them.
2. the sun and its gaseous layers; to be exposed to it following their death and before the Day of Judgment.
3. Saqar, which is the nearest sun, other than the present sun; because this sun will be broken up on Doomsday. Saqar now is looming to all people from faraway. To this Saqar those, will be admitted on the Judgment Day, who ascribe associates with God.
See the link:
http://man-after-death.741.com/2.htm#Hell_

eanassir.
 

eanassir

Time Out
Jul 26, 2007
3,099
9
38
These comets do not follow a known rule; they come and go every now and then; they do not orbit the sun or any planet; they go wandering about in the space; and may be attracted to some cold region in the planets or moons. The Astronomers observed some comet when it impacted Jupiter.​
eanassir.​