9-11 coincidence
- Thread starter Logic 7
- Start date
Without watching any of these clips, I will guess that they have to do with the following:
1. Mossad.
2. Holograms
3. Free Masons
4. New World Order
5. Time Travel
6. False Flag operations
7. CNN altering 9/11 footage.
8. The stonecutters
1. Mossad.
2. Holograms
3. Free Masons
4. New World Order
5. Time Travel
6. False Flag operations
7. CNN altering 9/11 footage.
8. The stonecutters
Here is the real conspiracy, man. The man keeps coming up with these conspiracy theories man, and then like, we fall for them dude, and spend too much time on the internet squinting at bad quality video, bro. The CIA are behind it, dog. They are wasting my time on these false conspiracies so I won't find the real one, totally.
Take a look at how the folks with more letters after their surnames than initials before play in their forums....
http://my.expatica.com/c:nl/forum/viewtopic.php?t=89896&sid=4b984e7909d7a883ad84075de1156db0
http://www.centerforinquiry.net/forums/viewthread/2602/P30/
Guess it's hard not to think outside the box when even the box is outside the box.
Wolf
http://my.expatica.com/c:nl/forum/viewtopic.php?t=89896&sid=4b984e7909d7a883ad84075de1156db0
http://www.centerforinquiry.net/forums/viewthread/2602/P30/
Guess it's hard not to think outside the box when even the box is outside the box.
Wolf
What a crock of ****e. The first is like saying, 'in the history of buildings hit by 767 aircraft, only two have fallen down."
It's just wacko bull****. A hundred years ago, people like this were religious nuts.
It's just wacko bull****. A hundred years ago, people like this were religious nuts.
While I'm not going to jump on any conspiracy bandwagon, that is not what was said. What was said is that in the history of the U.S., fire has not caused the collapse of a steel frame building. As far as I can tell, this is true.
And what do you think of WTC7?... You have to admit it's rater odd that the closer buildings were severely burned up, but their structures never went down... Why did WTC7 fall? And how did it fall?
And in the history of the United States, a giant jumbo jet filled with jet fuel hadn't crashed into the side of a 110 story building either.
A Boeing 767 is just 20% bigger than the Boeing 707's it was designed to withstand impact from - though it was going a lot faster.
http://www.werboom.de/vt/html/body_707_vs_767.html
Wolf
And whoever told you the other buildings didn't fall? The debris that fell from the two tallest towers crushed the lower buildings. All the buildings with the exception of Tower 7 were significantly closer to the North and South Towers.
It did survive the impact.
Here's what happened next.
The sheer force of the impact blew off the fire rated material on the structural steel.
The fire weakened (not melted) the horizontal trusses.
Pancake effect, buildings come down.
Oooooooorrrrrrrrrrr, the buildings were packed with explosives that somehow escaped blowing up by the impact of the planes. :-?
All this crap about 707 vs 767.
Okay, so let's look at that. At the time the WTC were built, they decided with their height and proximity to the airport to design them to withstand a 707 hitting them. So what empirical evidence did the designers have to build to? None. They came up with some ideas of what they needed to design it to, and went with that. Who knows exactly what effect a 707 would have on a building? Nobody. It's never happened.
THE ONLY WAY THAT ARGUMENT WOULD HOLD WATER WOULD BE IF THE WTC HAD ALREADY WITHSTOOD A 707 CRASHING INTO IT.
The bridge in Minneapolis was designed to withstand repair work, too, but it fell down.
The space shuttle was designed to withstand ice hitting its tiles, too, but that's failed. Twice catastrophically.
You guys have an awful lot of faith in engineering as an absolute. And that the construction was exactly, completely, 100% to spec. Ever been to Laval, and used an overpass?
Combined with the claims about planes not being in videos, and bizarre ideas about camera angles and tree heights, which totally ignore focal lenght and zoom lens and perspective, all of this crap has no credibility.
For everyone who claims the evidence of conspiracy is right there, the same can be said for the evidence against conspiracy.
Okay, so let's look at that. At the time the WTC were built, they decided with their height and proximity to the airport to design them to withstand a 707 hitting them. So what empirical evidence did the designers have to build to? None. They came up with some ideas of what they needed to design it to, and went with that. Who knows exactly what effect a 707 would have on a building? Nobody. It's never happened.
THE ONLY WAY THAT ARGUMENT WOULD HOLD WATER WOULD BE IF THE WTC HAD ALREADY WITHSTOOD A 707 CRASHING INTO IT.
The bridge in Minneapolis was designed to withstand repair work, too, but it fell down.
The space shuttle was designed to withstand ice hitting its tiles, too, but that's failed. Twice catastrophically.
You guys have an awful lot of faith in engineering as an absolute. And that the construction was exactly, completely, 100% to spec. Ever been to Laval, and used an overpass?
Combined with the claims about planes not being in videos, and bizarre ideas about camera angles and tree heights, which totally ignore focal lenght and zoom lens and perspective, all of this crap has no credibility.
For everyone who claims the evidence of conspiracy is right there, the same can be said for the evidence against conspiracy.
...what empirical evidence did the designers have to build to?...
How about crash test results from any of several Boeing 707's tested at Langley for FAA and US military?
Link has one of those stupid smileys and doesn't work. Google it - Boeing 707 crash test/concept to reality.
Anyone with a lot of time to read some in-depth stuff from 9/11, have a go at this:
http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com/keytopics/9-11update.html
Wolf
How about crash test results from any of several Boeing 707's tested at Langley for FAA and US military?
Link has one of those stupid smileys and doesn't work. Google it - Boeing 707 crash test/concept to reality.
Anyone with a lot of time to read some in-depth stuff from 9/11, have a go at this:
http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com/keytopics/9-11update.html
Wolf
Last edited: