Fake CNN video on 9-11

[lone wolf]

Umm ... have you ever heard of perspective, different points of vantage and more than ONE camera?

Wolf

 

[Just the Facts]

quite funny isnt?

Yes, very funny. Here's a picture that proves the WTC was no taller than a banner pole:

I'm surprized the communications tower on top of the WTC didn't get knocked over...that looks very dangerous!

 

[Just the Facts]

Whoops, credit to the photographer of the above photo:

http://kratofil.com/ny/

 

[EagleSmack]

BRAVO! BRAVO!

I agree... is that banner taller than the WTC... absolutely. The picture is right there and that PROVES it.

 

[thomaska]

BRAVO! BRAVO!

I agree... is that banner taller than the WTC... absolutely. The picture is right there and that PROVES it.

Poor terrorists...they probably had to fly around that flag pole too, to get to the building...

 

[Logic 7]

Yes, very funny. Here's a picture that proves the WTC was no taller than a banner pole:

I'm surprized the communications tower on top of the WTC didn't get knocked over...that looks very dangerous!

That is very different, the banner pole is so close, that it appears to be taller, when in fact , you look at a plane, and gets lower than a building,then any other angle you will see the building higher than the plane, that is just a fact.

Now look at this image, where i highligh in blue, the building that appears just before the plane crash in the wtc from cnn video, right here you see CNN GOT IT WRONG ALL THE WAY.

 

[Toro]

Logic, what are you trying to prove?

 

[Avro]

Whats funny is a libtard like yourself attacking the Turner broadcasting network, one of the most liberal media outlets on the planet.

Yeah, you mean the very network that made things up about Mike Moores movie Sicko?

Give your head a shake.:roll:

 

[Just the Facts]

That is very different, the banner pole is so close, that it appears to be taller, when in fact , you look at a plane, and gets lower than a building,then any other angle you will see the building higher than the plane, that is just a fact.

That's true, but irrelevant. No one disputes that a plane that is lower than a building LOOKS like it's lower than a building. What the heck are you selling?

A desperate attempt at misdirection to save face, which failed miserably.

Planes are no different than flagpoles, they both follow the same laws of perspective.

Edit: as do buildings

 

[Logic 7]

Logic, what are you trying to prove?

That the cnn video shot is fake.

 

[Logic 7]

That's true, but irrelevant. No one disputes that a plane that is lower than a building LOOKS like it's lower than a building. What the heck are you selling?

A desperate attempt at misdirection to save face, which failed miserably.

Planes are no different than flagpoles, they both follow the same laws of perspective.

Edit: as do buildings

It is relevent, if you see a plane going over your head and see the wings are hiding the top fo the building that is just beside you, it means the plane is lower than the building, and it means at the same time, we should see the building higher than the plane on the opposite side, which we don't, not only this fact but also the building in the cnn video isnt that close to the wtc, again like shown in the JPG that i've uploaded.

 

[lone wolf]

I am asuming the shot was taken from the vicinity of the treed area near the red arrow. If you'll draw a straight line over the top of your building highlighted in blue (line of sight) you'll note the upper portion of WTC would still be in view. The closer building (highlighted in blue) did NOT get taller. You are standing much closer to it. The plane appears to be lower than your building owing your perspective. Telephoto lenses and expanded images have distorted (flattened) the true scene. Though the politics and events of 911 may be questionable, there is little doubt an airplane struck the WTC.

Wolf

 

[Just the Facts]

the building in the cnn video isnt that close to the wtc, again like shown in the JPG that i've uploaded.

Exactly. The building is closer to the photographer than to the subject, which is exactly what creates the illusion that the building is taller than the altitude of the plane, the exact same effect that makes the flagpole appear taller than the WTC.

Your fake video claim has been thoroughly trounced. You do yourself injustice by pursuing it.

 

[Toro]

That the cnn video shot is fake.

I think that's ludicrous.

But let's say you are correct.

Then, so what? What are you trying to prove?

 

[Just the Facts]

Came across this interesting piece on 2d perspective:

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=425_1185265180&p=1

 

[Logic 7]

I think that's ludicrous.

But let's say you are correct.

Then, so what? What are you trying to prove?

THat doesnt matter to you that cnn broadcast fake video on a such tragic day like 9-11?

Why is that?

how come US military has their hand of what is being broadcast on cnn since 2000?

why is that?


To me , with this fake video, we are begining to see the big picture of this event.

 

[Logic 7]

Came across this interesting piece on 2d perspective:

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=425_1185265180&p=1

Nice , still doesnt explain why the plane is lower than the building, and we don't see that same building on the other side.

 

[Logic 7]

Exactly. The building is closer to the photographer than to the subject, which is exactly what creates the illusion that the building is taller than the altitude of the plane, the exact same effect that makes the flagpole appear taller than the WTC.

Your fake video claim has been thoroughly trounced. You do yourself injustice by pursuing it.

Your exemple doesnt explain why the plane is lower than the building, that is just a sad fact.

 

[TenPenny]

Holy CRAP. You're still going on about this?

I just want to know how that bridge in Minneapolis fell faster than gravity, and where all the thermite came from.

 

[Just the Facts]

Your exemple doesnt explain why the plane is lower than the building, that is just a sad fact.

Yes, it does.