What do you mean?Ok, look in the recent thread posts... I am taking you on the black rights compared to gay rights.
What do you mean?Ok, look in the recent thread posts... I am taking you on the black rights compared to gay rights.
Yes...I see it...I responded...I'm baffled...shocked and awed as they would say...new thread in wreck beach.
Agreed...even if he apologizes...does it really matter? He thinks it. It's kind of just a superficial thing. He's saying sorry...but he's not really sorry. And, fine, I don't care if he apologizes...the fact that these are his opinions bother me...but, hey, he will think what he wants to.*sigh*
My point to all this was that man had no right running his mouth about personal oppinion.....AND the Military must have agreed with me because he apologized for saying them........he didnt apologies for them being HIS opinion he apologized for SAYING them.........THAT was my point.
Agreed...even if he apologizes...does it really matter? He thinks it. It's kind of just a superficial thing. He's saying sorry...but he's not really sorry. And, fine, I don't care if he apologizes...the fact that these are his opinions bother me...but, hey, he will think what he wants to.
Homophobia is certainly of recent origin. It came in the gates with PC and feminism. It's still wet behind the ears. The man needs some room. It's a position with huge responsibility. Let him share his views without fear of offense. And let those offended speak their minds. As they have. But I still want him unfettered.
This vendetta the gay community and its supporters have against any who might oppose their standing or position has a precedent. It reminds me perfectly of the actions of the Jewish Defence League in support of Israel. The League in tandem with associated groups prowled the news and media outlets for years looking for targets. If you even used the word holocaust as a descriptor for anything other than the WWII experience of the Jewish people you were nailed to the wall. So what did the obsessive vigilance and vindictiveness get them? The country they attempted to surround with an iron wall is much less respected and in many areas reviled. And the cause they sought to protect is under siege in papers world-wide.
Of course, it's a vendetta. The man stepped out of line. As far as you determine the line. Directed malice pure and simple.
And how's he supposed to do his job with folks like you throwing bricks under his feet every ten seconds?
We all should try a little harder to make his life less difficult. He's got way more responsibility than you and I and 10 000 others. I am not in the least interested in pursuing him with a muzzle and a satchel of bricks.
Agreed...even if he apologizes...does it really matter? He thinks it. It's kind of just a superficial thing. He's saying sorry...but he's not really sorry. And, fine, I don't care if he apologizes...the fact that these are his opinions bother me...but, hey, he will think what he wants to.
The only oppinion Pace is allowed to have is the one the military gives him! THATS in his contract.
The only oppinion Pace is allowed to have is the one the military gives him! THATS in his contract.
The policy of the US Military is dont ask dont tell........there is NO moral conotation put to that......period. This is a General who was stating HIS opinion on military policy........THATS a nono.........why isnt he up on charges?