As much as I dislike Suziki, this time he is right and his bona fide's outnumber all of the "18000 scientists" put together. Most of them are employed in the energy sector anyway.
Proof?
I'm sure David's credentials are better than the flat earthers you subscribe to.
I have yet to see one that isn't linked to big oil and has a list of scientific credentials the likes of Mr. Suzuki.
Nice diversion, but it's not gonna fly.
That's an impressive list there #juan. Can you find anything even remotely related to the environment regarding his academic career?
He is obviously an eminent scientist in the field of genetics. So what's up with enviroment?
Nice diversion, but it's not gonna fly.
That's an impressive list there #juan. Can you find anything even remotely related to the environment regarding his academic career?
He is obviously an eminent scientist in the field of genetics. So what's up with enviroment?
............. or monger fear and propagandize.
If you go back a few posts I already explained about one time he had exaggerated wildly and spewed the exaggeration everywhere he could.Nonsense. Dr. Suzuki is a world class, fully accredited scientist who's reputation is spotless. The Dr. runs an international scientific foundation that is a recognized authority on climatology, and any related science. Are you qualified to question his competency? [FONT=Arial,Helvetica][SIZE=-1]David MacRae's[/SIZE][/FONT] topic opener was so full of holes and out and out mistakes, it was a joke.