Who cares ?
Hi there,
I tried to find an event where I could congratulate the work done by the Bush administration but cannot find one. I am sure I may miss something, but I cannot remember a single event where they took a neutral stand. US administrations, by how they are conceived let judgments to a sole individual too many times a year to produce a stable game plan. The Bush administration cannot hide itself behind a sole man thinking he hold the key to war. He can build and had the UNFAIR ability to conceived and mastermind the attacks on Irak.
Canada has followed the UN in Afganistan because, back then, we supported, in close majority the engagement. We are not more reasponsible than the percentage of our support for current conflict; as the US are too, in their engagements... Than the President (PM, in Canada) hold the balance to 100%...
i.e.: We, Canadians, recently declined on our supports to troops, a/p combined survey's, to a support of about 45% in average, we are than, responsible for it to this extend, and Harper currently hold the balance.
I think we can now understand better how I grade Mr. Bush on my responsibility list. All others, including the war & Rumsfelt, hehe, is just a chess game for him...
Take care *Curiosity* and make sure to make distinctions yourself between the Bush Admin and the US citizens. THEY DO CARE about how they are perceived by non-extremists everywhere. I am not god, neither you are to judge 300M citizens point of views. The last person I know who did that went to war on it's own words... BTW, if you know any GREAT acheivements by the US Administration that never hid/or is hiding an agenda, let me know. I would like to know.
John Muff
John Muff
Honestly - the U.S. could care less whether they are regarded as "bad sometimes" or "hated and wished dead" by others.
[...]
Strangely they are never credited for the good work they do.... but don't expect that either.
Hi there,
I tried to find an event where I could congratulate the work done by the Bush administration but cannot find one. I am sure I may miss something, but I cannot remember a single event where they took a neutral stand. US administrations, by how they are conceived let judgments to a sole individual too many times a year to produce a stable game plan. The Bush administration cannot hide itself behind a sole man thinking he hold the key to war. He can build and had the UNFAIR ability to conceived and mastermind the attacks on Irak.
Canada has followed the UN in Afganistan because, back then, we supported, in close majority the engagement. We are not more reasponsible than the percentage of our support for current conflict; as the US are too, in their engagements... Than the President (PM, in Canada) hold the balance to 100%...
i.e.: We, Canadians, recently declined on our supports to troops, a/p combined survey's, to a support of about 45% in average, we are than, responsible for it to this extend, and Harper currently hold the balance.
I think we can now understand better how I grade Mr. Bush on my responsibility list. All others, including the war & Rumsfelt, hehe, is just a chess game for him...
Take care *Curiosity* and make sure to make distinctions yourself between the Bush Admin and the US citizens. THEY DO CARE about how they are perceived by non-extremists everywhere. I am not god, neither you are to judge 300M citizens point of views. The last person I know who did that went to war on it's own words... BTW, if you know any GREAT acheivements by the US Administration that never hid/or is hiding an agenda, let me know. I would like to know.
John Muff