Defund CBC

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,371
3,251
113
CBC boss refuses to disclose whether she'll take hefty bonus
Author of the article:Bryan Passifiume
Published Oct 21, 2024 • Last updated 2 days ago • 2 minute read

Monday was the third time Tait has been hauled in front of House committees to justify her bonus

OTTAWA — The embattled head of the CBC refused to say if she would accept a bonus offered as part of her generous compensation package, calling it a “personal matter.”

CBC President and CEO Catherine Tait, testifying before the House Canadian Heritage Committee on Monday, was asked by Conservative MP Damien Kurek whether she would accept a bonus — a matter she has refused to clarify during previous appearances before House committees.

“‘It’s confidential’ doesn’t cut it for Canadians, it doesn’t cut it for Parliamentary oversight,” Kurek said.

“So again, I ask, will you — specifically today — share with this committee whether or not you will refuse a severance package or bonus at the conclusion of your term as president and CEO of the CBC?”



Tait, whose appointment runs until Jan. 3, reiterated her previous refusals to answer the question directly.

“As I’ve said, I consider that to be a personal matter, and I believe I’m protected by the privacy act in that regard,” she said.

Assuming the bonus is approved by the Privy Council Office, Tait can expect to receive up to 28% of her annual salary — between $468,900 and $551,600 — as a bonus this year. She’s overseeing Canada’s national broadcaster at a time it is shedding hundreds of unionized jobs and eliminating hundreds of more due to flagging revenues and performance.

“To get a bonus on top of that, at a time when viewership is down, ad revenue for your organization is down, I ask specifically about whether or not you would refuse to take a severance package at the conclusion of your term?” Kurek said.


In response, Tait said Canadians would expect the CBC to honour its commitment to their non-unionized employees, and maintained that while total ad revenues were indeed down, digital ad revenues actually went up during her tenure.

Monday was the third time Tait’s been brought before House committees to testify about executive bonuses for the CBC, which she inisted on Monday was an attempt by committee members to drag her name through the mud.

“There is a clear effort on the part of members of this committee to vilify and to discredit me and to discredit the organization,” she said during questioning by Conservative MP Jamil Jivani, a committee member.

Franco Terrazzano, federal director for the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, wasn’t buying Tait’s dodge.

“Tait taking a taxpayer-funded bonus or severance pay-out, on top of her six-figure, taxpayer-funded salary, is the furthest thing in the world from a ‘personal matter,’” he said.

“It’s taxpayer money, so taxpayers have every right to know.”

bpassifiume@postmedia.com
X: @bryanpassifiume
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
27,494
7,397
113
B.C.
CBC boss refuses to disclose whether she'll take hefty bonus
Author of the article:Bryan Passifiume
Published Oct 21, 2024 • Last updated 2 days ago • 2 minute read

Monday was the third time Tait has been hauled in front of House committees to justify her bonus

OTTAWA — The embattled head of the CBC refused to say if she would accept a bonus offered as part of her generous compensation package, calling it a “personal matter.”

CBC President and CEO Catherine Tait, testifying before the House Canadian Heritage Committee on Monday, was asked by Conservative MP Damien Kurek whether she would accept a bonus — a matter she has refused to clarify during previous appearances before House committees.

“‘It’s confidential’ doesn’t cut it for Canadians, it doesn’t cut it for Parliamentary oversight,” Kurek said.

“So again, I ask, will you — specifically today — share with this committee whether or not you will refuse a severance package or bonus at the conclusion of your term as president and CEO of the CBC?”



Tait, whose appointment runs until Jan. 3, reiterated her previous refusals to answer the question directly.

“As I’ve said, I consider that to be a personal matter, and I believe I’m protected by the privacy act in that regard,” she said.

Assuming the bonus is approved by the Privy Council Office, Tait can expect to receive up to 28% of her annual salary — between $468,900 and $551,600 — as a bonus this year. She’s overseeing Canada’s national broadcaster at a time it is shedding hundreds of unionized jobs and eliminating hundreds of more due to flagging revenues and performance.

“To get a bonus on top of that, at a time when viewership is down, ad revenue for your organization is down, I ask specifically about whether or not you would refuse to take a severance package at the conclusion of your term?” Kurek said.


In response, Tait said Canadians would expect the CBC to honour its commitment to their non-unionized employees, and maintained that while total ad revenues were indeed down, digital ad revenues actually went up during her tenure.

Monday was the third time Tait’s been brought before House committees to testify about executive bonuses for the CBC, which she inisted on Monday was an attempt by committee members to drag her name through the mud.

“There is a clear effort on the part of members of this committee to vilify and to discredit me and to discredit the organization,” she said during questioning by Conservative MP Jamil Jivani, a committee member.

Franco Terrazzano, federal director for the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, wasn’t buying Tait’s dodge.

“Tait taking a taxpayer-funded bonus or severance pay-out, on top of her six-figure, taxpayer-funded salary, is the furthest thing in the world from a ‘personal matter,’” he said.

“It’s taxpayer money, so taxpayers have every right to know.”

bpassifiume@postmedia.com
X: @bryanpassifiume
If it is in her contract she should take it . Whoever gave her the contract should have their pp wacked .
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,220
5,843
113
Olympus Mons
Tait admitted earlier that she and the execs laid off hundreds of CBC employees so they could afford the bonuses they gave themselves.
Or to put it another way, they fired a bunch of people so they could steal more of our money. Because that's what this is, more of Mr. Sunny Ways kleptocracy.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
25,681
9,258
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
The CBC doesn’t mind taking your money. It just doesn’t want you to know how it spends your money.

CBC President Catherine Tait was called to committee on Parliament Hill – again – because of bonuses handed out under her watch.

Tait repeatedly refused to say if she’ll take severance or bonus payouts when she leaves the CBC in the new year.

“Will you share with this committee whether or not you will refuse a severance package or bonus at the conclusion of your term of president and CEO of the CBC?” asked MP Damien Kurek.

“I consider that to be a personal matter,” Tait responded.

Here’s the thing: when your salary, bonus and possible severance are paid for by the taxpayer, these are not personal matters.
Kurek also asked Michael Goldbloom, the Chairman of the CBC’s Board of Directors, if he would make public what recommendations the board made to the government regarding Tait’s bonuses.

“Our communications with the government around the [bonus] recommendations with the CEO, my understanding is that is governed by privacy,” Goldbloom said.

Tait’s salary is between $468,900 and $551,600 per year. For context, the prime minister’s salary is $406,200.

Crown corporation CEOs at Tait’s level can also receive a bonus of up to 28%.
1730086729970.jpeg
But taxpayers are not allowed to know exactly how much she’s paid.

Concealing information from taxpayers is nothing new at the CBC. The state broadcaster continues to stonewall the release of bonus figures for its seven senior executives.

The CBC revealed to the Canadian Taxpayers Federation that those seven senior executives took home almost $3.8 million in total compensation in 2023 – an average of more than $540,000 apiece.

But the CBC is refusing to say how much it pays executives in bonuses each year. As a result, the CTF launched a legal challenge to force the CBC to come clean with taxpayers as a matter of principle.

It’s taxpayers’ money, so taxpayers deserve to know how much they’re paying for senior executive bonuses.

And taxpayers are paying an arm and a leg for the CBC.

The CBC is dishing out $18.4 million in bonuses to 1,194 non-union staff this year. That includes $3.3 million in bonuses for 45 executives, for an average of $73,000 each – more than the average salary for Canadian workers, according to Statistics Canada.

The CBC’s bonuses have cost taxpayers $132 million since 2015.

There are 1,450 CBC staffers taking home six-figure salaries. Since 2015, the number of CBC employees taking a six-figure annual salary has spiked by 231%.

All told, the CBC will cost taxpayers $1.4 billion this year. What could Canadians do with that money instead of propping up a state broadcaster?

That money could pay the salaries of about 7,000 cops and 7,000 paramedics. Or it could buy 2,400 homes in Calgary, or cover groceries for about 85,000 Canadian families for a year.

Tait’s committee appearance gets a failing grade from taxpayers on transparency. Tait taking a taxpayer-funded bonus or severance payout, on top of her six-figure, taxpayer-funded salary, is the furthest thing in the world from a “personal matter,” as Tait claimed.

That’s taxpayers’ money, so taxpayers have every right to know.

Taxpayers may not know what Tait’s bonus is, but there is one thing taxpayers do know for sure: politicians shouldn’t be handing Tait a bucket of cash on her way out the door.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Twin_Moose

Serryah

Executive Branch Member
Dec 3, 2008
9,805
2,336
113
New Brunswick
Are there problems with the CBC? Absolutely.

Should it be defunded?

Absolutely not.

An example was last night on the radio (for me), during Cross Country Checkup, they were discussing Emergency Rooms and problems with it and the health care system in general. Programs like that would not survive if the CBC was defunded and then likely destroyed because of it.

Worse would be the loss of the regional programs and national things like Quirks and Quarks, solely Canadian music the documentary shows, the comedy (The Debaters is great to listen to).

All that would be gone.

Not all CBC is dealing with "Liberal biased news" as is claimed.

So yes, change needs to happen, but not defunding.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: TheShadow

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
14,963
2,638
113
Toronto, ON
Are there problems with the CBC? Absolutely.

Should it be defunded?

Absolutely not.

An example was last night on the radio (for me), during Cross Country Checkup, they were discussing Emergency Rooms and problems with it and the health care system in general. Programs like that would not survive if the CBC was defunded and then likely destroyed because of it.

Worse would be the loss of the regional programs and national things like Quirks and Quarks, solely Canadian music the documentary shows, the comedy (The Debaters is great to listen to).

All that would be gone.

Not all CBC is dealing with "Liberal biased news" as is claimed.

So yes, change needs to happen, but not defunding.
I think the primary focus has been on TV not radio. Although maybe adding commercials to the radio would be a better way to fund the radio part too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Twin_Moose

Serryah

Executive Branch Member
Dec 3, 2008
9,805
2,336
113
New Brunswick
I think the primary focus has been on TV not radio. Although maybe adding commercials to the radio would be a better way to fund the radio part too.

Except the point of CBC Radio is to be commercial free except for top of the hour CBC specific adverts for programs.

While yes the primary focus has been TV, that isn't all CBC covers and affecting TV will affect the radio/streaming too.
 

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
14,963
2,638
113
Toronto, ON
Except the point of CBC Radio is to be commercial free except for top of the hour CBC specific adverts for programs.

While yes the primary focus has been TV, that isn't all CBC covers and affecting TV will affect the radio/streaming too.
It is my understanding they have different budgets and only the TV budget will be targeted but I suppose CBC execs could rob from Peter to save Paul.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
112,627
12,555
113
Low Earth Orbit
It is my understanding they have different budgets and only the TV budget will be targeted but I suppose CBC execs could rob from Peter to save Paul.
News division is TV, radio, and print articles that go through the AP.

They lost sports which was a huge money maker for them. Don Cherry put a voodoo curse on them when fired.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron in Regina

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
27,494
7,397
113
B.C.
Are there problems with the CBC? Absolutely.

Should it be defunded?

Absolutely not.

An example was last night on the radio (for me), during Cross Country Checkup, they were discussing Emergency Rooms and problems with it and the health care system in general. Programs like that would not survive if the CBC was defunded and then likely destroyed because of it.

Worse would be the loss of the regional programs and national things like Quirks and Quarks, solely Canadian music the documentary shows, the comedy (The Debaters is great to listen to).

All that would be gone.

Not all CBC is dealing with "Liberal biased news" as is claimed.

So yes, change needs to happen, but not defunding.
If anyone watched the CBC they would sell advertising to fund it , but no they want to air crap nobody cares about on the taxpayers dime . On top of which they pay their managerial staff outrageously high salaries . Get rid of them and guit funding media . We are broke reel in the spending .
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
112,627
12,555
113
Low Earth Orbit
If anyone watched the CBC they would sell advertising to fund it , but no they want to air crap nobody cares about on the taxpayers dime . On top of which they pay their managerial staff outrageously high salaries . Get rid of them and guit funding media . We are broke reel in the spending .
They do make some good programs that earn ad dollars in other markets and studio leasing. Ive seen the Murdoch Mysteries set on dozens of programs. Schitts Creek and Kim of Kensington made really money on ad dollars and distribution.

Losing Hockey Night in Canada was crippling.
 

bob the dog

Council Member
Aug 14, 2020
1,396
1,039
113
They need to be like GE and make a few separate companies that can compete within their own sector. Lots of demand for production crews and that end of things. Reporting not so much. It's the government laissez faire attitude that is killing productivity.

The other thing is no employee needs that much money. They just like it. Doing well on your own and getting rich because of it is entirely different.
 

TheShadow

Electoral Member
Apr 24, 2020
944
457
63
Grand Bend
Are there problems with the CBC? Absolutely.

Should it be defunded?

Absolutely not.

An example was last night on the radio (for me), during Cross Country Checkup, they were discussing Emergency Rooms and problems with it and the health care system in general. Programs like that would not survive if the CBC was defunded and then likely destroyed because of it.

Worse would be the loss of the regional programs and national things like Quirks and Quarks, solely Canadian music the documentary shows, the comedy (The Debaters is great to listen to).

All that would be gone.

Not all CBC is dealing with "Liberal biased news" as is claimed.

So yes, change needs to happen, but not defunding.
I feel you are incorrect.

The CBC enjoys a lofty position of protection and is very very biased politically.

The issue with Jian Ghomeshi alone shows they cannot regulate themselves.

I had a huge laugh when the CBC did an in depth investigation on themselves with the Ghomeshi issue.

Pathetic.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Serryah

Serryah

Executive Branch Member
Dec 3, 2008
9,805
2,336
113
New Brunswick
I feel you are incorrect.

You can "feel" all you want, doesn't make you right.

The CBC enjoys a lofty position of protection and is very very biased politically.

Biased? Likely a bit, yeah... in their news section. Seeing as they don't hold the Libs to account for their shit nearly enough.

The issue with Jian Ghomeshi alone shows they cannot regulate themselves.

There were a lot of issues with the Ghomeshi issue, not only that CBC fucked up.

I had a huge laugh when the CBC did an in depth investigation on themselves with the Ghomeshi issue.

Likely you didn't give a shit.

Pathetic.

Yes, some people are.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
27,494
7,397
113
B.C.
You can "feel" all you want, doesn't make you right.



Biased? Likely a bit, yeah... in their news section. Seeing as they don't hold the Libs to account for their shit nearly enough.



There were a lot of issues with the Ghomeshi issue, not only that CBC fucked up.



Likely you didn't give a shit.



Yes, some people are.
Yes you are pathetic, CBC is pathetic the radio programs are pathetic the tv news is pathetic . They are losing viewers hand over foot and there managers reward themselves with bonus’s all the while laying off staff to get costs in truely pathetic .
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheShadow

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
25,681
9,258
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
I haven’t watched the CBC on the television or listen to a radio program on it in years, but about a decade or so back, they did have a couple of good 1/2 hour shows.

This hour has 22 minutes, Corner Gas (was that CBC?), enjoyed the Benny Hill reruns about 50 years ago, Disney World on Sundays at 6pm in the 70’s before cable TV, uhm….there’s got to be a few others probably. Oh, in the ‘70’s they did 1/2 hour chunks of Monty Python skits, but I guess that’s about 50 years ago too.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
112,627
12,555
113
Low Earth Orbit
I haven’t watched the CBC on the television or listen to a radio program on it in years, but about a decade or so back, they did have a couple of good 1/2 hour shows.

This hour has 22 minutes, Corner Gas (was that CBC?), enjoyed the Benny Hill reruns about 50 years ago, Disney World on Sundays at 6pm in the 70’s before cable TV, uhm….there’s got to be a few others probably. Oh, in the ‘70’s they did 1/2 hour chunks of Monty Python skits, but I guess that’s about 50 years ago too.
My wife watches a couple programs on CBC Gem. One is a miniatures competition the other sand castles.

We were hooked on Schitts Creek from EP 1 SE 1. If youve never seen it, I highly recommend it. Youll love it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron in Regina

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
27,494
7,397
113
B.C.
My wife watches a couple programs on CBC Gem. One is a miniatures competition the other sand castles.

We were hooked on Schitts Creek from EP 1 SE 1. If youve never seen it, I highly recommend it. Youll love it.
Certainly they have some talent , but with the good ones they also proudly present little mosque on the prairies and other beauties .
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
112,627
12,555
113
Low Earth Orbit
Certainly they have some talent , but with the good ones they also proudly present little mosque on the prairies and other beauties .
Did you ever watch Little Mosque on the Prairie or chose not to cause of being a Muzzie thing?

It was funny too. Quirky Canadian style humour.