It's Climate Change I tell'ya!! IT'S CLIMATE CHANGE!!

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,607
3,307
113
Beads, firewood, food part of Toronto’s $219,500 'climate action' spend
Author of the article:Justin Holmes
Published Oct 07, 2024 • Last updated 1 day ago • 5 minute read

City hall doled out nearly $220,000 last year through its Indigenous climate action grants program.
The city spent almost a quarter-million dollars last year to fight climate change with things like dream catchers, beadwork and cooking classes.


City hall approved $219,500 worth of grants in 2023, the first year of Toronto’s Indigenous climate action grants program, according to documents obtained by the Sun via a freedom-of-information request.

The documents show the program blew past the $200,000 budgeted by the city’s environment and climate division by nearly 10%.

The program offers grants of up to $20,000 “to support local Indigenous communities in undertaking projects and initiatives that help to address the climate emergency and protect the environment,” according to a city news release from when the initiative was announced in June 2023. (Unlike this program, city hall publicly announces the recipients of similar but smaller grants meant for youth and neighbourhood groups.)


There were two rounds of approvals: One for projects submitted by a July 2023 deadline and one for a September 2023 deadline. The city said 18 of 25 eligible proposals last year were approved and funded.

Some proposals centre on educational initiatives, such as Children’s Peace Theatre, which was granted $15,000 to fund programming on subjects such as ecological governance and biodiversity.



A group called Earth Works Visions was awarded $17,000 to host stewardship events on a trail that runs along the Humber River in Weston. The Turtle Protectors were given $15,000 to pay for a part-time staffer and honorariums for volunteers.


In a written response to questions from the Sun, city officials said the grants are “directly aligned” with Toronto’s council-approved carbon-emission goals.

Many proposals, however, lack a clear link to the environment, let alone the climate.

Two groups, Afro-N8tive Creations and the Afro-Indigenous Nova Scotian Collective, were each given $7,500. The former wanted the money to “showcase their art, traditional medicines and environmentally focused crafts while supporting the Black and Indigenous community,” a document from the environment and climate department showed. The other had plans for “cultural teachings, such as ribbon skirt making, beading and a dream catcher workshop,” and to hold a feast. (A Facebook account linked to the Afro-Indigenous Nova Scotian Collective’s website has no posts after Sept. 24, 2023. It was approved as part of the round of proposals submitted by Sept. 15.)


Deeply Rooted Farmers Market, which billed itself on Instagram as “Tkaronto’s first Black and Indigenous farmers market,” was given $10,000 to develop “culturally relevant workshops for community members, including beadwork and cooking classes.” (The group’s website is offline and its social media pages have not been updated since 2023. The city confirmed it no longer has a permit for the East York park where it once operated.)

Asemaa Circles got $15,000 to create “a BIPOC seed and medicine sharing and trading network.” CAMH’s Shkaabe Makwa group was awarded $7,500 for gardening supplies, “traditional medicines,” firewood and costs related to the centre’s sweat lodge.


Waadinidijig, a “virtual study group” of Ojibwa students, was granted $5,000 to support “Immersion Days programming” and a “medicine planting workshop.” The Call Auntie Clinic got $14,000 to “make walking and mobility more accessible, as well as increasing outdoor time with infants and children,” plus preparing “traditional meals.”


A group called MichiSaagiig Jiimaaneg was granted $17,000 for a teaching lodge – “a space to observe nature and learn about using renewable resources” – on Toronto Island.

“Due to legislation and inherent racism by settlers, the Mississauga of the Credit and other Mississauga nations have not been able to access Toronto Island for many generations now. Having a lodge that is engaged in Mississauga culture and knowledges is necessary for the well-being of our nation,” the proposal said.

The Indigenous Land Stewardship Circle was awarded $17,000 for four ceremonies: For the spring and autumn equinox and summer and winter solstice, plus “full moon” rituals and water blessings.

Asemaa Circles’ website describes the 440 Parkside project as a collaboration between it and another grant recipient.
Then there is the case of a “group” called 440 Parkside Dr. The city set aside $10,000 for the High Park land reclamation initiative, which Asemaa Circles’ website said “was established out of relationships developed through the Indigenous Land Stewardship Circle and the Asemaa Circles project, in collaboration with the High Park Nature Centre.”


While this additional funding could have put these groups over the $20,000 maximum, the city said in its statement that the grants are awarded on a “project basis.”

This sort of collaboration by Indigenous groups is “very common and, in fact, encouraged,” the statement added.

CAMH also provided a statement to the Sun. It said allowing patients to connect with the land “through ceremony, access to traditional medicines and cultural teaching is critical to (its) innovative model of care,” but offered no comment as to how traditional healing initiatives better the environment.

In all cases for which contact information was available online, the Sun reached out to the groups whose projects appeared unrelated to the environment. Only CAMH responded.


In its statement, the city said “many” of the climate action grant projects “directly support climate resilience.

“Healthy green and blue spaces offer multiple climate benefits in urban environments,” the statement said, and “cultivating and growing Indigenous knowledge and learnings will provide information about how to best steward Toronto’s natural spaces and biodiversity.”

Additionally, “people who are socially isolated or disconnected from their communities are more at risk from climate impacts,” the city said.

The city said the grants came with “reporting requirements” that included visits from a municipal employee. In the case of Deeply Rooted Farmers Market, the proposed programming was completed last year while it was still running, the city said.

Last year’s results seem to have inspired city hall to relax its grip on the money. Group members no longer need to live in separate households to qualify for funding and larger grants are available for groups that have neither a trustee nor “a bank account in the name of the collective,” the statement said.

The final deadline for 2024 applications was Sept. 20. Those applications are still under review.

jholmes@postmedia.com
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,607
3,307
113
Climate change boosted Milton’s destructive rain, winds: Scientists
Author of the article:Associated Press
Associated Press
Alexa St. John
Published Oct 11, 2024 • 2 minute read

Human-caused climate change intensified deadly Hurricane Milton ‘s rainfall by 20 to 30% and strengthened its winds by about 10%, scientists said in a new flash study. The analysis comes just two weeks after Hurricane Helene devastated the southeastern United States, a storm also fueled by climate change.


World Weather Attribution researchers said Friday that without climate change, a hurricane like Milton would make landfall as a weaker Category 2, not considered a “major” storm, instead of a Category 3.

WWA’s rapid studies aren’t peer-reviewed but use peer-reviewed methods. The WWA compares a weather event with what might have been expected in a world that hasn’t warmed about 1.3 degree Celsius since pre-industrial times.

The team of scientists test the influence of climate change on storms by analyzing weather data and climate models, but in the case of Milton — which followed so shortly after Helene — the researchers used only weather observations data. WWA said despite using different approaches, the results are compatible with studies of other hurricanes in the area that show a similar hurricane intensity increase of between 10 and 50% due to climate change, and about a doubling in likelihood.


“We are therefore confident that such changes in heavy rainfall are attributable to human-caused climate change,” said WWA, an international scientist collaborative that launched in 2015 and conducts rapid climate attribution studies.

At least eight people died in Milton, which spread damage far and wide even though it didn’t directly strike Tampa as feared. Roadways flooded and dozens of tornadoes tore through coastal areas. At one point power was out to some 3.4 million customers, and more than 2.4 million remained without power Friday morning.

Milton made landfall Wednesday evening as a Category 3 hurricane on the west coast of Florida near Siesta Key, about 112 kilometres south of the Tampa Bay area, driven by warmer waters near record levels.


Climate scientist Michael Mann said he agrees with the thrust of the analysis that climate change substantially worsened the hurricane. But if anything, Mann said, the study might “vastly understate the impact that it actually had” with what he called “the fairly simple approach” of its estimates.

He cited other attribution studies after Helene that calculated significantly larger rainfall due to warming.

“It’s the difference between a modest effect and a major effect,” Mann, of the University of Pennsylvania, told The Associated Press. “I would argue that the catastrophic flooding we saw over large parts of the southeastern U.S. with Helene was indeed a major effect of human-caused warming.”

Jeff Masters, a meteorologist who co-founded the commercial weather service Weather Underground, said the study looked solid to him.

“I support their conclusion that without climate change, Hurricane Milton would have hit as a Cat 2, not a Cat 3,” he said.

Another analysis, done by research organization Climate Central, said earlier this week that climate change made possible the warmed water temperatures that amplified Milton. Andrew Pershing, the group’s vice president for science, said those waters were made up to 200 times more likely with climate change. The group said waters were more than 1.8 degrees F (1 degrees C) warmer than the 1991 to 2020 average.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
113,368
12,825
113
Low Earth Orbit
Climate change boosted Milton’s destructive rain, winds: Scientists
Author of the article:Associated Press
Associated Press
Alexa St. John
Published Oct 11, 2024 • 2 minute read

Human-caused climate change intensified deadly Hurricane Milton ‘s rainfall by 20 to 30% and strengthened its winds by about 10%, scientists said in a new flash study. The analysis comes just two weeks after Hurricane Helene devastated the southeastern United States, a storm also fueled by climate change.


World Weather Attribution researchers said Friday that without climate change, a hurricane like Milton would make landfall as a weaker Category 2, not considered a “major” storm, instead of a Category 3.

WWA’s rapid studies aren’t peer-reviewed but use peer-reviewed methods. The WWA compares a weather event with what might have been expected in a world that hasn’t warmed about 1.3 degree Celsius since pre-industrial times.

The team of scientists test the influence of climate change on storms by analyzing weather data and climate models, but in the case of Milton — which followed so shortly after Helene — the researchers used only weather observations data. WWA said despite using different approaches, the results are compatible with studies of other hurricanes in the area that show a similar hurricane intensity increase of between 10 and 50% due to climate change, and about a doubling in likelihood.


“We are therefore confident that such changes in heavy rainfall are attributable to human-caused climate change,” said WWA, an international scientist collaborative that launched in 2015 and conducts rapid climate attribution studies.

At least eight people died in Milton, which spread damage far and wide even though it didn’t directly strike Tampa as feared. Roadways flooded and dozens of tornadoes tore through coastal areas. At one point power was out to some 3.4 million customers, and more than 2.4 million remained without power Friday morning.

Milton made landfall Wednesday evening as a Category 3 hurricane on the west coast of Florida near Siesta Key, about 112 kilometres south of the Tampa Bay area, driven by warmer waters near record levels.


Climate scientist Michael Mann said he agrees with the thrust of the analysis that climate change substantially worsened the hurricane. But if anything, Mann said, the study might “vastly understate the impact that it actually had” with what he called “the fairly simple approach” of its estimates.

He cited other attribution studies after Helene that calculated significantly larger rainfall due to warming.

“It’s the difference between a modest effect and a major effect,” Mann, of the University of Pennsylvania, told The Associated Press. “I would argue that the catastrophic flooding we saw over large parts of the southeastern U.S. with Helene was indeed a major effect of human-caused warming.”

Jeff Masters, a meteorologist who co-founded the commercial weather service Weather Underground, said the study looked solid to him.

“I support their conclusion that without climate change, Hurricane Milton would have hit as a Cat 2, not a Cat 3,” he said.

Another analysis, done by research organization Climate Central, said earlier this week that climate change made possible the warmed water temperatures that amplified Milton. Andrew Pershing, the group’s vice president for science, said those waters were made up to 200 times more likely with climate change. The group said waters were more than 1.8 degrees F (1 degrees C) warmer than the 1991 to 2020 average.
What fuel storms prior to climate change? Horses and kerosene.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Twin_Moose

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,607
3,307
113
Ontario’s top court orders new hearing for youth-led climate case
Author of the article:Canadian Press
Canadian Press
Jordan Omstead
Published Oct 17, 2024 • Last updated 2 days ago • 1 minute read

Ontario’s top court has ordered a new hearing for a youth-led constitutional challenge of the provincial government’s emissions target, saying the case raised important issues that should be considered afresh.


The unanimous decision by the Ontario Court of Appeal was immediately heralded as a win by the group of seven young people who brought the case.

The case is the first in Canada to consider whether governments’ approach to climate change has the potential to violate the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

At stake was an emissions target that dates back to when Premier Doug Ford’s then-newly elected Progressive Conservative government repealed the law underpinning Ontario’s cap-and-trade system for lowering emissions.

The young people argued the weakened target committed Ontario to dangerously high levels of greenhouse gases, knowing it would cause harm to the province’s youth and future generations, in violation of the Charter.

The young people brought evidence suggesting the government’s revised plan would allow for 30 megatonnes more in annual emissions by 2030, equivalent to the annual emissions of about seven million passenger vehicles, or nearly 200 megatonnes from 2018 to 2030.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Taxslave2

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
113,368
12,825
113
Low Earth Orbit
.

The young people brought evidence suggesting the government’s revised plan would allow for 30 megatonnes more in annual emissions by 2030, equivalent to the annual emissions of about seven million passenger vehicles, or nearly 200 megatonnes from 2018 to 2030.
What does that equate to in cement?
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,607
3,307
113
Wildfire smoke pollution linked to thousands of annual deaths: global study
Author of the article:Canadian Press
Canadian Press
Jordan Omstead
Published Oct 21, 2024 • 1 minute read

A new international study co-authored by a Canadian researcher says climate change is contributing to thousands more wildfire smoke-related deaths than in previous decades.
A new international study co-authored by a Canadian researcher says climate change is contributing to thousands more wildfire smoke-related deaths than in previous decades.
A new international study co-authored by a Canadian researcher says climate change is contributing to thousands more wildfire smoke-related deaths than in previous decades.


The modelling study estimates that about 12,566 annual wildfire smoke-related deaths in the 2010s were linked to climate change, up from about 669 in the 1960s.

Sian Kou-Giesbrecht, an assistant professor at Dalhousie University who contributed to the study, says the results attest to the importance of reducing planet-warming greenhouse gases.

She says the study did not find significant changes in smoke-related deaths from Canada’s boreal wildfires, suggesting that’s likely due to the country’s relatively small population size and how tricky it is to model forest fires in the region, given its unique mix of shrubs and peat.

The study indicates the biggest influence was found in South America, Australia and Europe.

The results, published Monday in the peer-reviewed journal Nature Climate Change, build on another study by the same research group that suggested climate change had increased the global area burned by wildfire by about 16% from 2003 to 2019.
 

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,032
3,819
113
Edmonton
Wildfire smoke pollution linked to thousands of annual deaths: global study
Author of the article:Canadian Press
Canadian Press
Jordan Omstead
Published Oct 21, 2024 • 1 minute read

A new international study co-authored by a Canadian researcher says climate change is contributing to thousands more wildfire smoke-related deaths than in previous decades.
A new international study co-authored by a Canadian researcher says climate change is contributing to thousands more wildfire smoke-related deaths than in previous decades.
A new international study co-authored by a Canadian researcher says climate change is contributing to thousands more wildfire smoke-related deaths than in previous decades.


The modelling study estimates that about 12,566 annual wildfire smoke-related deaths in the 2010s were linked to climate change, up from about 669 in the 1960s.

Sian Kou-Giesbrecht, an assistant professor at Dalhousie University who contributed to the study, says the results attest to the importance of reducing planet-warming greenhouse gases.

She says the study did not find significant changes in smoke-related deaths from Canada’s boreal wildfires, suggesting that’s likely due to the country’s relatively small population size and how tricky it is to model forest fires in the region, given its unique mix of shrubs and peat.

The study indicates the biggest influence was found in South America, Australia and Europe.

The results, published Monday in the peer-reviewed journal Nature Climate Change, build on another study by the same research group that suggested climate change had increased the global area burned by wildfire by about 16% from 2003 to 2019.
I call B.S.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,607
3,307
113
European climate agency says this will likely be hottest year on record -- again
Author of the article:Associated Press
Associated Press
Melina Walling
Published Nov 06, 2024 • Last updated 20 hours ago • 4 minute read

CHICAGO — For the second year in a row, Earth will almost certainly be the hottest it’s ever been. And for the first time, the globe this year reached more than 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) of warming compared to the pre-industrial average, the European climate agency Copernicus said Thursday.


“It’s this relentless nature of the warming that I think is worrying,” said Carlo Buontempo, director of Copernicus.

Buontempo said the data clearly shows the planet would not see such a long sequence of record-breaking temperatures without the constant increase of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere driving global warming.

He cited other factors that contribute to exceptionally warm years like last year and this one. They include El Nino — the temporary warming of parts of the Pacific that changes weather worldwide — as well as volcanic eruptions that spew water vapor into the air and variations in energy from the sun. But he and other scientists say the long-term increase in temperatures beyond fluctuations like El Nino is a bad sign.


“A very strong El Nino event is a sneak peek into what the new normal will be about a decade from now,” said Zeke Hausfather, a research scientist with the nonprofit Berkeley Earth.

News of a likely second year of record heat comes a day after U.S. Republican Donald Trump, who has called climate change a “hoax” and promised to boost oil drilling and production, was reelected to the presidency. It also comes days before the next UN climate conference, called COP29, is set to begin in Azerbaijan. Talks are expected to focus on how to generate trillions of dollars to help the world transition to clean energies like wind and solar and avoid more warming.

Also on Thursday, a report released by the United Nations Environment Programme called for increased funds to adapt to global heating and its consequences. It found that the $28 billion spent worldwide to adapt to climate change in 2022 — the latest year the data is available — is an all time high. But it’s still far short of the estimated $187 to $359 billion needed every year to deal with the heat, floods, droughts and storms exacerbated by climate change.


“Earth’s ablaze,” said UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres in a pre-recorded statement marking the report’s release. “Humanity’s torching the planet and paying the price” with the vulnerable most affected, he said.

“Frankly, there is no excuse for the world not to get serious about adaptation,” said UNEP’s director Inger Andersen. “We need well-financed and effective adaptation that incorporates fairness and equity.”

Buontempo pointed out that going over the 1.5 degree Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) threshold of warming for a single year is different than the goal adopted in the 2015 Paris Agreement. That goal was meant to try to cap warming at 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) since pre-industrial times on average, over 20 or 30 years.


A United Nations report this year said that since the mid-1800s on average, the world has already heated up 1.3 degrees Celsius (2.3 degrees Fahrenheit) — up from previous estimates of 1.1 degrees (2 degrees Fahrenheit) or 1.2 degrees (2.2 degrees Fahrenheit). That’s of concern because the UN says the greenhouse gas emission reduction goals of the world’s nations still aren’t nearly ambitious enough to keep the 1.5 degree Celsius target on track.


The target was chosen to try to stave off the worst effects of climate change on humanity, including extreme weather. “The heat waves, storm damage, and droughts that we are experiencing now are just the tip of the iceberg,” said Natalie Mahowald, chair of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at Cornell University.


Going over that number in 2024 doesn’t mean the overall trend line of global warming has, but “in the absence of concerted action, it soon will,” said University of Pennsylvania climate scientist Michael Mann.

Stanford University climate scientist Rob Jackson put it in starker terms. “I think we have missed the 1.5 degree window,” said Jackson, who chairs the Global Carbon Project, a group of scientists who track countries’ carbon dioxide emissions. “There’s too much warming.”

Indiana state climatologist Beth Hall said she isn’t surprised by the latest report from Copernicus, but emphasized that people should remember climate is a global issue beyond their local experiences with changing weather. “We tend to be siloed in our own individual world,” she said. Reports like this one “are taking into account lots and lots of locations that aren’t in our backyard.”


Buontempo stressed the importance of global observations, bolstered by international cooperation, that allow scientists to have confidence in the new report’s finding: Copernicus gets its results from billions of measurements from satellites, ships, aircraft and weather stations around the world.

He said that going over the 1.5 degree Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) benchmark this year is “psychologically important” as nations make decisions internally and approach negotiations at the annual UN climate change summit Nov. 11-22 in Azerbaijan.

“The decision, clearly, is ours. It’s of each and every one of us. And it’s the decision of our society and our policymakers as a consequence of that,” he said. “But I believe these decisions are better made if they are based on evidence and facts.”

— Associated Press reporters Seth Borenstein in Washington and Sibi Arasu in Bengaluru, India contributed to this report.