WE really need to get rid of this guy

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,568
3,289
113
Canada’s consul general says he had nothing to do with purchase of $9M NYC residence
Author of the article:Canadian Press
Canadian Press
Sarah Ritchie
Published Sep 12, 2024 • 2 minute read

OTTAWA — Canada’s consul general in New York told members of a House of Commons committee on Thursday that he had nothing to do with the purchase of the country’s new official residence in New York City, and he doesn’t know when he will be moving in.


Former CTV journalist Tom Clark was called before the House operations committee, which is studying the government’s decision to buy a $9-million condo on Billionaires’ Row in Manhattan.

“I had no role whatsoever in either deciding to sell the former residence, or buying the new one. That was completely undertaken by the property bureau in Ottawa,” Clark said.

Senior government officials at an earlier meeting of the committee testified that Canada’s old residence in New York City was in need of millions of dollars of renovations and buying the new residence made more financial sense. They, too, had said Clark had no role in the decision.

Global Affairs Canada is selling the old apartment, and it’s listed for $13 million. The unit was purchased in 1961 and was last renovated in 1982.


Conservative members of the committee have called the purchase wasteful and opulent and proof of just how little the Liberals understand the struggles of everyday Canadians.

Concerns about the Park Avenue apartment were first raised in 2014, and Global Affairs approved a $1.8-million renovation in 2021. That was delayed because of the pandemic.

Documents submitted to the committee show the renovation project’s cost rose to $2.6 million and was not expected to solve some fundamental issues with the apartment.

It was not in compliance with accessibility legislation, there was a lack of separation between family and work space and the co-operative board had imposed restrictions on events that could be held on site, the department said.


Clark said Thursday that he has hosted 38 events at the existing official residence since taking over the position in February 2023.

“It is Canada’s house in New York,” he said.

Conservative MP Michael Barrett said documents the committee has received suggest that conversations about buying a new residence “intensified” within Global Affairs after Prime Minister Justin Trudeau visited Clark in New York in April.

“You asked him for a new place, is that right?” Barrett asked Clark.

Clark responded, “That’s incorrect.”

Barrett continued to challenge Clark, asking whether he ever questioned the optics of buying the property, given the cost-of-living crisis in Canada.

“I am well aware of the challenges being faced by both Canadians and Americans when it comes to housing,” Clark said. “In this case, I was not involved in any way, shape, or form in the decision to buy this new residence.”

He later said he pays rent for his residence of $1,800 a month, though he did not say whether that was in Canadian or U.S. dollars.

Conservative MPs repeatedly accused Clark of lying, reading from an email submitted by Global Affairs that said the head of mission in New York had been “instrumental throughout the process” of the purchase and that Clark provided the “green light” for the new residence. Clark insisted the email was incorrect.

The Conservatives say if they win the next election, Clark will be fired.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,568
3,289
113
Crombie seeks job security, changes to Liberal constitution
Changes proposed to Ontario Liberal Party constitution to protect leader even after a loss.


Author of the article:Brian Lilley
Published Sep 13, 2024 • Last updated 2 days ago • 3 minute read

If changes up for a vote at next week’s Liberal AGM are approved, party leaders would be protected from a leadership review even after a loss.


Ontario Liberals will gather in London starting next Friday and will be asked to change how and when leadership reviews happen.

“It’s concerning,” said one longtime senior Liberal, who asked not to be identified.

Right now, the Ontario Liberal Party is required to have a leadership review within two years of a general election. Under the changes proposed, the party would only require a review if the Liberals did not form a majority government, and they lost 15% of the seats they held at the start of the election.

That would mean that the Liberals, who currently have nine seats at Queen’s Park, could be reduced to eight seats in the next election and Bonnie Crombie would keep her job.

“She is trying to turn the Liberal Party into the Bonnie Crombie Party,” one disgruntled Liberal member said via email. “Essentially, she is planning ahead for a scenario where she only wins 9-12 seats and trying to avoid having to answer for that result.”



While disgruntled Liberals are pointing the finger at Crombie, her office says she had nothing to do with these changes.

“The Leader never asked for any changes to the leadership review process, and will not support any changes to the leadership review process,” spokesperson Carter Brownlee said in an email after the Sun broke the news that has many party members upset.

Crombie won the leadership of the party last December in a race that was tighter than expected. She was touted as someone who would breathe fresh air into the party and kickstart fundraising.


That hasn’t exactly happened.

Crombie’s Liberals have been stuck in the polls for the last two years. The latest Abacus Data poll shows them at 26% voter support, unchanged from when she took over, while Doug Ford’s PC Party is backed by 42% of voters and the NDP under Marit Stiles sits at 21%.

On the fundraising front, the Liberals are trailing the NDP, according to official figures pulled recently from Elections Ontario. As of last week, the PC Party had raised $3.7 million, the NDP raised $721,548 and the Liberals raised $714,214.

Parties often claim to have raised more, the rules in Ontario don’t require donations of less than $200 to be reported, but those figures can’t be verified. That Crombie and the Liberals are trailing Stiles and the NDP in official tally fundraising should be worrisome for the party.


All this to say, Liberal Party members would be wise to reject these changes to the leadership review when it comes up for a vote.

There are sensible changes in how a leadership election is to be held under party rules, including forbidding an interim leader from being a candidate. As written though, the changes would protect Crombie, and any future leader, from facing the party membership after a disastrous election result.

The party’s annual general meeting starts on Sept. 20, the day after the byelection in Bay of Quinte to replace recently retired Ford cabinet minister Todd Smith. The choice of the byelection date was no accident with the PCs hoping to keep what has been a safe seat and pour salt in Liberal wounds as their convention starts.

The Liberals are hopeful that their candidate, Sean Kelly, can defeat the PC candidate Tyler Allsopp.

The PCs have represented the area since Smith first won the seat in 2011, but it was Liberal for many years before that. In the last few elections, the NDP have been the challenger to the PCs, not the Liberals.

A win in that byelection would give the Liberals a reason to party all weekend – a loss would put a cloud over the event.

blilley@postmedia.com
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,568
3,289
113
Longtime PC MPP Lisa MacLeod announces she will not seek re-election
Author of the article:Canadian Press
Canadian Press
Published Sep 13, 2024 • 1 minute read

A longtime Progressive Conservative Member of Provincial Parliament won’t be looking to retain her title.

A post to social media from Lisa MacLeod announced she will not be seeking re-election as the MPP for Nepean.

MacLeod has been a provincial elected official since 2006, when she was first elected to represent the Ottawa-area riding of Nepean-Carlton.

Boundary changes later led to her solely representing Nepean in Queen’s Park beginning in 2018, when her Progressive Conservative Party returned to power for this first time since 1999.

Among the jobs MacLeod has held in cabinet includes minister of children, community and social services, as well as minister of sports and tourism.

MacLeod says she’s proud of what Nepean has become, calling it a safe place to work, live, and raise a family.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,568
3,289
113
Colorado teen hoping for lakeside homecoming photos shot in face by town councilman, police say
Author of the article:Associated Press
Associated Press
Jesse Bedayn
Published Sep 13, 2024 • Last updated 2 days ago • 1 minute read

DENVER (AP) — A teenager scouting out a spot near a Colorado lake to take picturesque homecoming photos this weekend was shot in the face when the boyfriend of the property owner fired his weapon and yelled, “Oh sh__, my gun went off,” court records show.


The 17-year-old boy survived the shooting and told investigators he didn’t believe the man intentionally shot him. But the man who shot him, Brent Metz, a councilman in a tiny town in the Denver metro area, was arrested on suspicion of charges that include first degree assault.

Metz did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment. A phone number or attorney for Metz were not immediately found. He is a councilman in the town of Mountain View.

The victim’s friend told investigators they had hopped the fence on the property to ask the homeowners permission to take photos the coming weekend. Knocking on the door and looking around back to no avail, they headed back to their car to write a note for the homeowner.

Around that time, Metz received a call from his girlfriend, the property owner, who said there were trespassers, according to law enforcement. Metz drove up to the property as the two boys were sitting in their car.


Exiting his truck, Metz leveled a gun at the two boys and fired through the windshield, the teenagers told law enforcement. The shot left one of the boys bleeding profusely from his face, a piece of his mouth missing, as his friend ran around the car and used his shirt to stanch the bleeding, the friend told investigators.

Metz tried to help them, but the friend said he pushed Metz away.

A scan at the hospital showed a possible bullet fragment still in the teenager’s head, according to court records. Metz was arrested on charges of first degree assault, felony menacing, illegal discharge of a firearm and reckless endangerment.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
26,140
9,550
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
“Hey @elonmusk — how much would it cost to provide @Starlink to every Canadian household that doesn’t have high speed?” the parliamentarian asked on X on Saturday morning. “If this $2.14 BILLION plan is the panacea of expanding access, competition, and service — where is the interest from private investors and banks?”

The billionaire founder of Tesla responded to Barrett later in the day, asserting that Starlink could have provided the service for, “Less than half that amount.” Musk’s comments prompted Barrett to call it “a common-sense solution for Canada.”
In a major announcement on Friday, when Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced a $2.14 billion loan to Telesat, a Canadian satellite company. The money given to this publicly traded company is to support their low-Earth-orbit satellite program known as Lightspeed.

“Designed, manufactured, and operated in Canada, the Telesat Lightspeed satellite network will be the largest in Canadian history – creating thousands of jobs, growing our economy, and getting high-speed Internet to Canadians,” Trudeau said at the announcement.

“How much would it cost to provide Starlink to every Canadian household that doesn’t have high speed?” Conservative MP Michael Barrett asked.

“Less than half that amount,” Musk replied.
That’s all it took for top Liberals from Champagne, to Diweldi, to Chrystia Freeland’s chief of staff and others to attack the Conservatives and anyone noting that Elon Musk’s Starlink is far cheaper as being against Quebec jobs.

Kind of has an SNC-Lavalin aroma to it. Realizing that making this argument was a bad look, the Liberals later switched to saying the Conservatives wanted to hand over Canada’s defence satellite capability to Musk. Of course, no one made that argument, and the government’s main selling point was that this investment would bring high-speed internet to rural and remote areas for homes and businesses.

It’s not the first time they’ve invested in Telesat, a former Crown corporation that was privatized by the Chretien Liberals in the 1990s and went public in November 2021. Shortly before Telesat began trading on the Nasdaq, the Trudeau government gave Telesat $1.4 billion, $790 million as a repayable loan and $650 million treated as a preferred share equity investment.

The promise at the time was that Telesat Lightspeed would be, “connecting approximately 40,000 households in rural and remote regions.” That isn’t exactly happening, not directly.

Here’s the real problem: Starlink, operated by Musk, already had more than 400,000 customers in Canada, according to a National Post report earlier this year.

Basically, Musk’s Starlink is thumping Telesat in its own backyard.

This is the aspect — servicing remote areas — of Lightspeed’s capabilities that Trudeau played up during Friday’s announcement, not national defence. Even at that, Lightspeed is primarily a commercial project, not a military one, so Trudeau is effectively investing taxpayer money in a commercial operation.

They are now trying to play the patriotism card – I thought patriotism was always bad to progressives – in claiming Telesat is a Canadian company. It is headquartered in Ottawa, but its major shareholders are based in New York and Chicago.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
113,235
12,774
113
Low Earth Orbit
“Hey @elonmusk — how much would it cost to provide @Starlink to every Canadian household that doesn’t have high speed?” the parliamentarian asked on X on Saturday morning. “If this $2.14 BILLION plan is the panacea of expanding access, competition, and service — where is the interest from private investors and banks?”

The billionaire founder of Tesla responded to Barrett later in the day, asserting that Starlink could have provided the service for, “Less than half that amount.” Musk’s comments prompted Barrett to call it “a common-sense solution for Canada.”
In a major announcement on Friday, when Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced a $2.14 billion loan to Telesat, a Canadian satellite company. The money given to this publicly traded company is to support their low-Earth-orbit satellite program known as Lightspeed.

“Designed, manufactured, and operated in Canada, the Telesat Lightspeed satellite network will be the largest in Canadian history – creating thousands of jobs, growing our economy, and getting high-speed Internet to Canadians,” Trudeau said at the announcement.

“How much would it cost to provide Starlink to every Canadian household that doesn’t have high speed?” Conservative MP Michael Barrett asked.

“Less than half that amount,” Musk replied.
That’s all it took for top Liberals from Champagne, to Diweldi, to Chrystia Freeland’s chief of staff and others to attack the Conservatives and anyone noting that Elon Musk’s Starlink is far cheaper as being against Quebec jobs.

Kind of has an SNC-Lavalin aroma to it. Realizing that making this argument was a bad look, the Liberals later switched to saying the Conservatives wanted to hand over Canada’s defence satellite capability to Musk. Of course, no one made that argument, and the government’s main selling point was that this investment would bring high-speed internet to rural and remote areas for homes and businesses.

It’s not the first time they’ve invested in Telesat, a former Crown corporation that was privatized by the Chretien Liberals in the 1990s and went public in November 2021. Shortly before Telesat began trading on the Nasdaq, the Trudeau government gave Telesat $1.4 billion, $790 million as a repayable loan and $650 million treated as a preferred share equity investment.

The promise at the time was that Telesat Lightspeed would be, “connecting approximately 40,000 households in rural and remote regions.” That isn’t exactly happening, not directly.

Here’s the real problem: Starlink, operated by Musk, already had more than 400,000 customers in Canada, according to a National Post report earlier this year.

Basically, Musk’s Starlink is thumping Telesat in its own backyard.

This is the aspect — servicing remote areas — of Lightspeed’s capabilities that Trudeau played up during Friday’s announcement, not national defence. Even at that, Lightspeed is primarily a commercial project, not a military one, so Trudeau is effectively investing taxpayer money in a commercial operation.

They are now trying to play the patriotism card – I thought patriotism was always bad to progressives – in claiming Telesat is a Canadian company. It is headquartered in Ottawa, but its major shareholders are based in New York and Chicago.
So is it a defense program or high speed interweb? Or is this like 5G, promoted as the greatest thing ever but 100% useless to the consumer that funds it?
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
26,140
9,550
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Kind of has an SNC-Lavalin aroma to it. Realizing that making this argument was a bad look, the Liberals later switched to saying the Conservatives wanted to hand over Canada’s defence satellite capability to Musk. Of course, no one made that argument, and the government’s main selling point was that this investment would bring high-speed internet to rural and remote areas for homes and businesses.
So is it a defense program or high speed interweb? Or is this like 5G, promoted as the greatest thing ever but 100% useless to the consumer that funds it?
Time will tell.
 
  • Like
Reactions: petros

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
26,140
9,550
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Here’s the real problem: Starlink, operated by Musk, already had more than 400,000 customers in Canada, according to a National Post report earlier this year.

Basically, Musk’s Starlink is thumping Telesat in its own backyard.
So is it a defense program or high speed interweb? Or is this like 5G, promoted as the greatest thing ever but 100% useless to the consumer that funds it?
Tiny portion could be Canadian military defence related. A bigger portion could be Liberal Party defence related to keep them in power until Oct 2025.
“How much would it cost to provide Starlink to every Canadian household that doesn’t have high speed?” Conservative MP Michael Barrett asked.

“Less than half that amount,” Musk replied.
Kind of has an SNC-Lavalin aroma to it.
However, Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet told reporters in Ottawa on Wednesday that his party will not support the Tories’ motion, saying in French that it “contains absolutely nothing.”

“So will the Bloc Québécois vote in favour of the Conservative motion next week? The answer is no,” Blanchet said.

Meanwhile, support for Trudeau and his Liberal government has hit a “new low,” polling shows.
 
  • Like
Reactions: petros

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
15,032
2,704
113
Toronto, ON
The Bloc won't have the power it has now in a new parliament. It won't let it fall. But when TrueDope needs something passed, he will have to bribe either the NDP or the Bloc.

His position takes the NDP off the hook. They can vote for no-confidence and not look like hypocrites now. Or they can vote against and say they are against PP.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
26,140
9,550
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
The Bloc won't have the power it has now in a new parliament. It won't let it fall. But when TrueDope needs something passed, he will have to bribe either the NDP or the Bloc.

His position takes the NDP off the hook. They can vote for no-confidence and not look like hypocrites now. Or they can vote against and say they are against PP.
I’m guessing the NDP/Liberals will vote against the Liberal/NDP’s next week to show “they’re suddenly different” than the last two years and five months and whatever they’ve been propping them up….’cuz they know that the Liberal/NDP will be safe this time. Jagmeet will make a big show of it.

The Bloc, if it can steer the liberals for the next year, will end up being the official opposition to the Conservative/Poilieve Gov’t with the Liberal/NDP & NDP/Liberals competing for 3rd & 4th place in Oct 2025, followed by the Green Party with both of their seats.

(It’ll be interesting to see who comes in third place and who comes into fourth place, & will it really matter because they’re essentially the same thing anyway?)
 

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
15,032
2,704
113
Toronto, ON
(It’ll be interesting to see who comes in third place and who comes into fourth place, & will it really matter because they’re essentially the same thing anyway?)
In the 90s the Reform/Alliance and the PCs were the same. They wound up merging. I can see the same happening with the Lieberals & NDP. In N years we will have a 2 party system + The Bloc if Quebec is still here.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
27,700
7,523
113
B.C.
In the 90s the Reform/Alliance and the PCs were the same. They wound up merging. I can see the same happening with the Lieberals & NDP. In N years we will have a 2 party system + The Bloc if Quebec is still here.
Nope the NDP is one party federally and provincially the provincial riding associations will never go for it .
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
26,140
9,550
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
I’m guessing the NDP/Liberals will vote against the Liberal/NDP’s next week to show “they’re suddenly different” than the last two years and five months and whatever they’ve been propping them up….’cuz they know that the Liberal/NDP will be safe this time. Jagmeet will make a big show of it.
His position takes the NDP off the hook. They can vote for no-confidence and not look like hypocrites now. Or they can vote against and say they are against PP.
1726779454126.jpeg
Way to go Jagmeet! You show the voters that you’re different from the liberal party that you absolutely have to “tear up” that agreement with last week because you couldn’t fathom backing them any longer…
The Bloc won't have the power it has now in a new parliament. It won't let it fall. But when TrueDope needs something passed, he will have to bribe either the NDP or the Bloc.
Mr Singh is trying to remain relevant to the Liberals? That Conservative motion is headed for all but certain defeat now that both the NDP and Bloc Québécois have said they will stand against Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre's attempt to force an early election — even though both Singh and Bloc Leader Yves-François Blanchet have said they have misgivings about Trudeau.
1726780650581.jpeg
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,568
3,289
113
Trudeau is Canada's most destructive and charming PM
Author of the article:Stephen LeDrew
Published Sep 18, 2024 • Last updated 1 day ago • 2 minute read

Justin Trudeau won in 2015 because he was the leader of the Liberal Party of Canada — the most successful political party in the western world.


But Justin Trudeau will lose the next election, so badly that it would embarrass any normal person, becoming the leader of the fourth party in the House of Commons. Trudeau will be obliterated because Canadians now understand that he is not the leader of the Liberal Party, but the leader of a “movement,” as he referred to the party when he became leader.

Canadians were not told that the “movement” to which Trudeau referred was his concept of a progressive party.

Trudeau has since declared time and time again that he is leading a “progressive” government, jointly with the NDP, and Canadians don’t like that.

Canadians don’t like top-down edicts from Ottawa, telling everyone that they will be forced to purchase only electric vehicles starting in 2035.



Canadians don’t like an authoritarian tax-and-spend socialist government that has ruined the economy.

Canadians don’t like a PM telling other world leaders that Canadian businesses are not allowed to sell clean-burning natural gas to other needy countries willing to pay billions of dollars.

Canadians don’t like a government handing out narcotics for free to anyone who asks.

Canadians don’t like parents not being told by education bureaucrats that their 11-year-old children are changing their gender.

The list of silly and egregious orders by our “sunny ways” prime minister would fill umpteen pages of this newspaper — readers know so many of them.


And yet our tone-deaf PM insists that he will win the next election by promising Canadians that upon re-election he will continue to deliver great government to Canadians. Huh? Continue to provide?

He thinks that he has delivered good government to Canadians?


He is so insulated by his sycophants and quisling MPs that he does not believe that virtually every citizen has more than a handful of serious complaints about how this government has either failed them or actually taken a position that attacks their well-being.

Liberals believe in free enterprise, a socially responsible government, an educational system that is not ruled by politically correct, woke bureaucrats and an immigration system that promotes Canada, as opposed to opening the floodgates to everyone in the world who wants a free ticket.


Liberals believe in a free press, uncensored by government bureaucrats, and they believe in open debate of the issues.

Progressives are autocratic socialists who believe that more government and more bureaucrats are the answer to all problems and that citizens should be glad to have a government, like Trudeau’s, which knows what is best for them.

That is why our PM is doubling down after defeats — to show people that he knows best.

That is why he is hanging on until the very last day to face the people in an election, ridding Canada of the most charming and destructive prime minister ever.

— LeDrew is the former president of the Liberal Party of Canada and host of the Three Minute Interview.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron in Regina

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,568
3,289
113
Toronto man allegedly directed bomb threats to U.S. Senator Patty Murray

Author of the article:Brad Hunter
Published Sep 18, 2024 • Last updated 1 day ago • 2 minute read

Toronto man Louis Bernabe, 29, was arrested in Seattle for threatening to blow up a U.S. senator.
Toronto man Louis Bernabe, 29, was arrested in Seattle for threatening to blow up a U.S. senator.
A 29-year-old Toronto man has been arrested and charged with directing bomb threats to a U.S. senator in Washington state.


Cops and local media say Louis Bernabe was arrested in Seattle, Wash. last week.

Bernabe allegedly flew to Seattle from Toronto and booked a room at the W Hotel. The hotel is about three blocks from Democratic Sen Patty Murray’s office, KOMO News reports.

Court documents cited by KOMO said Bernabe does not have a residence or employment in Seattle. It is unclear when Bernabe flew into the Pacific Northwest city.

Cops say that on Sept. 10, Bernabe posted on social media allegedly threatening to bomb Murray’s office. He visited her office the next day, asking staff how he could get a one-on-one then posted a selfie standing on the floor where Murray’s office is located.

He allegedly wrote on social media: “Senator Murray @senpattymurray, I am warning you ONCE AND FOR ALL. Quit your trashy play of partisan nonsense AT ONCE, or I swear to God, I WILL have you check the undercarriage of your car every single day to ensure you don’t get BLOWN UP to pieces. The people of this county have had it with the nonproductive crap from both sides. I have not seen my girlfriend in FIVE YEARS. We have the right to be in couple and reproduce if we choose to. If you deny us this right, you are nothing more than a nasty animal. In this case, I will condone whoever decides to put you down. Rabid creatures should be put to death.”

He had also posted a photo of a Heckler & Koch UMP submachine gun.

Not long afterward, Bernabe was arrested and taken to the King County Jail. He is being held on $250,000 bail. Bernabe has no prior criminal record.

However, he posted on Twitter that he had undergone eight psychiatric evaluations. He wrote: “I was diagnosed as having no specific mental illness.”



A relieved Murray thanked the cops.

“I am grateful to the Seattle Police Department and U.S. Capitol Police for their hard work to keep me, my family, and my staff safe following the recent bomb threat made by the individual now in custody. I’m doing well and hard at work, focused on everything from passing my bill to protect our right to IVF, to confirming another highly qualified judge for Washington state, to working to keep our government responsibly funded and open.”

Bernabe was booked for two counts of making bomb threats and felony harassment.

bhunter@postmedia.com

@HunterTOSun