WE really need to get rid of this guy

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,091
3,208
113
Canada’s consul general says he had nothing to do with purchase of $9M NYC residence
Author of the article:Canadian Press
Canadian Press
Sarah Ritchie
Published Sep 12, 2024 • 2 minute read

OTTAWA — Canada’s consul general in New York told members of a House of Commons committee on Thursday that he had nothing to do with the purchase of the country’s new official residence in New York City, and he doesn’t know when he will be moving in.


Former CTV journalist Tom Clark was called before the House operations committee, which is studying the government’s decision to buy a $9-million condo on Billionaires’ Row in Manhattan.

“I had no role whatsoever in either deciding to sell the former residence, or buying the new one. That was completely undertaken by the property bureau in Ottawa,” Clark said.

Senior government officials at an earlier meeting of the committee testified that Canada’s old residence in New York City was in need of millions of dollars of renovations and buying the new residence made more financial sense. They, too, had said Clark had no role in the decision.

Global Affairs Canada is selling the old apartment, and it’s listed for $13 million. The unit was purchased in 1961 and was last renovated in 1982.


Conservative members of the committee have called the purchase wasteful and opulent and proof of just how little the Liberals understand the struggles of everyday Canadians.

Concerns about the Park Avenue apartment were first raised in 2014, and Global Affairs approved a $1.8-million renovation in 2021. That was delayed because of the pandemic.

Documents submitted to the committee show the renovation project’s cost rose to $2.6 million and was not expected to solve some fundamental issues with the apartment.

It was not in compliance with accessibility legislation, there was a lack of separation between family and work space and the co-operative board had imposed restrictions on events that could be held on site, the department said.


Clark said Thursday that he has hosted 38 events at the existing official residence since taking over the position in February 2023.

“It is Canada’s house in New York,” he said.

Conservative MP Michael Barrett said documents the committee has received suggest that conversations about buying a new residence “intensified” within Global Affairs after Prime Minister Justin Trudeau visited Clark in New York in April.

“You asked him for a new place, is that right?” Barrett asked Clark.

Clark responded, “That’s incorrect.”

Barrett continued to challenge Clark, asking whether he ever questioned the optics of buying the property, given the cost-of-living crisis in Canada.

“I am well aware of the challenges being faced by both Canadians and Americans when it comes to housing,” Clark said. “In this case, I was not involved in any way, shape, or form in the decision to buy this new residence.”

He later said he pays rent for his residence of $1,800 a month, though he did not say whether that was in Canadian or U.S. dollars.

Conservative MPs repeatedly accused Clark of lying, reading from an email submitted by Global Affairs that said the head of mission in New York had been “instrumental throughout the process” of the purchase and that Clark provided the “green light” for the new residence. Clark insisted the email was incorrect.

The Conservatives say if they win the next election, Clark will be fired.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,091
3,208
113
Crombie seeks job security, changes to Liberal constitution
Changes proposed to Ontario Liberal Party constitution to protect leader even after a loss.


Author of the article:Brian Lilley
Published Sep 13, 2024 • Last updated 2 days ago • 3 minute read

If changes up for a vote at next week’s Liberal AGM are approved, party leaders would be protected from a leadership review even after a loss.


Ontario Liberals will gather in London starting next Friday and will be asked to change how and when leadership reviews happen.

“It’s concerning,” said one longtime senior Liberal, who asked not to be identified.

Right now, the Ontario Liberal Party is required to have a leadership review within two years of a general election. Under the changes proposed, the party would only require a review if the Liberals did not form a majority government, and they lost 15% of the seats they held at the start of the election.

That would mean that the Liberals, who currently have nine seats at Queen’s Park, could be reduced to eight seats in the next election and Bonnie Crombie would keep her job.

“She is trying to turn the Liberal Party into the Bonnie Crombie Party,” one disgruntled Liberal member said via email. “Essentially, she is planning ahead for a scenario where she only wins 9-12 seats and trying to avoid having to answer for that result.”



While disgruntled Liberals are pointing the finger at Crombie, her office says she had nothing to do with these changes.

“The Leader never asked for any changes to the leadership review process, and will not support any changes to the leadership review process,” spokesperson Carter Brownlee said in an email after the Sun broke the news that has many party members upset.

Crombie won the leadership of the party last December in a race that was tighter than expected. She was touted as someone who would breathe fresh air into the party and kickstart fundraising.


That hasn’t exactly happened.

Crombie’s Liberals have been stuck in the polls for the last two years. The latest Abacus Data poll shows them at 26% voter support, unchanged from when she took over, while Doug Ford’s PC Party is backed by 42% of voters and the NDP under Marit Stiles sits at 21%.

On the fundraising front, the Liberals are trailing the NDP, according to official figures pulled recently from Elections Ontario. As of last week, the PC Party had raised $3.7 million, the NDP raised $721,548 and the Liberals raised $714,214.

Parties often claim to have raised more, the rules in Ontario don’t require donations of less than $200 to be reported, but those figures can’t be verified. That Crombie and the Liberals are trailing Stiles and the NDP in official tally fundraising should be worrisome for the party.


All this to say, Liberal Party members would be wise to reject these changes to the leadership review when it comes up for a vote.

There are sensible changes in how a leadership election is to be held under party rules, including forbidding an interim leader from being a candidate. As written though, the changes would protect Crombie, and any future leader, from facing the party membership after a disastrous election result.

The party’s annual general meeting starts on Sept. 20, the day after the byelection in Bay of Quinte to replace recently retired Ford cabinet minister Todd Smith. The choice of the byelection date was no accident with the PCs hoping to keep what has been a safe seat and pour salt in Liberal wounds as their convention starts.

The Liberals are hopeful that their candidate, Sean Kelly, can defeat the PC candidate Tyler Allsopp.

The PCs have represented the area since Smith first won the seat in 2011, but it was Liberal for many years before that. In the last few elections, the NDP have been the challenger to the PCs, not the Liberals.

A win in that byelection would give the Liberals a reason to party all weekend – a loss would put a cloud over the event.

blilley@postmedia.com
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,091
3,208
113
Longtime PC MPP Lisa MacLeod announces she will not seek re-election
Author of the article:Canadian Press
Canadian Press
Published Sep 13, 2024 • 1 minute read

A longtime Progressive Conservative Member of Provincial Parliament won’t be looking to retain her title.

A post to social media from Lisa MacLeod announced she will not be seeking re-election as the MPP for Nepean.

MacLeod has been a provincial elected official since 2006, when she was first elected to represent the Ottawa-area riding of Nepean-Carlton.

Boundary changes later led to her solely representing Nepean in Queen’s Park beginning in 2018, when her Progressive Conservative Party returned to power for this first time since 1999.

Among the jobs MacLeod has held in cabinet includes minister of children, community and social services, as well as minister of sports and tourism.

MacLeod says she’s proud of what Nepean has become, calling it a safe place to work, live, and raise a family.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,091
3,208
113
Colorado teen hoping for lakeside homecoming photos shot in face by town councilman, police say
Author of the article:Associated Press
Associated Press
Jesse Bedayn
Published Sep 13, 2024 • Last updated 2 days ago • 1 minute read

DENVER (AP) — A teenager scouting out a spot near a Colorado lake to take picturesque homecoming photos this weekend was shot in the face when the boyfriend of the property owner fired his weapon and yelled, “Oh sh__, my gun went off,” court records show.


The 17-year-old boy survived the shooting and told investigators he didn’t believe the man intentionally shot him. But the man who shot him, Brent Metz, a councilman in a tiny town in the Denver metro area, was arrested on suspicion of charges that include first degree assault.

Metz did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment. A phone number or attorney for Metz were not immediately found. He is a councilman in the town of Mountain View.

The victim’s friend told investigators they had hopped the fence on the property to ask the homeowners permission to take photos the coming weekend. Knocking on the door and looking around back to no avail, they headed back to their car to write a note for the homeowner.

Around that time, Metz received a call from his girlfriend, the property owner, who said there were trespassers, according to law enforcement. Metz drove up to the property as the two boys were sitting in their car.


Exiting his truck, Metz leveled a gun at the two boys and fired through the windshield, the teenagers told law enforcement. The shot left one of the boys bleeding profusely from his face, a piece of his mouth missing, as his friend ran around the car and used his shirt to stanch the bleeding, the friend told investigators.

Metz tried to help them, but the friend said he pushed Metz away.

A scan at the hospital showed a possible bullet fragment still in the teenager’s head, according to court records. Metz was arrested on charges of first degree assault, felony menacing, illegal discharge of a firearm and reckless endangerment.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
25,146
9,062
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
“Hey @elonmusk — how much would it cost to provide @Starlink to every Canadian household that doesn’t have high speed?” the parliamentarian asked on X on Saturday morning. “If this $2.14 BILLION plan is the panacea of expanding access, competition, and service — where is the interest from private investors and banks?”

The billionaire founder of Tesla responded to Barrett later in the day, asserting that Starlink could have provided the service for, “Less than half that amount.” Musk’s comments prompted Barrett to call it “a common-sense solution for Canada.”
In a major announcement on Friday, when Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced a $2.14 billion loan to Telesat, a Canadian satellite company. The money given to this publicly traded company is to support their low-Earth-orbit satellite program known as Lightspeed.

“Designed, manufactured, and operated in Canada, the Telesat Lightspeed satellite network will be the largest in Canadian history – creating thousands of jobs, growing our economy, and getting high-speed Internet to Canadians,” Trudeau said at the announcement.

“How much would it cost to provide Starlink to every Canadian household that doesn’t have high speed?” Conservative MP Michael Barrett asked.

“Less than half that amount,” Musk replied.
That’s all it took for top Liberals from Champagne, to Diweldi, to Chrystia Freeland’s chief of staff and others to attack the Conservatives and anyone noting that Elon Musk’s Starlink is far cheaper as being against Quebec jobs.

Kind of has an SNC-Lavalin aroma to it. Realizing that making this argument was a bad look, the Liberals later switched to saying the Conservatives wanted to hand over Canada’s defence satellite capability to Musk. Of course, no one made that argument, and the government’s main selling point was that this investment would bring high-speed internet to rural and remote areas for homes and businesses.

It’s not the first time they’ve invested in Telesat, a former Crown corporation that was privatized by the Chretien Liberals in the 1990s and went public in November 2021. Shortly before Telesat began trading on the Nasdaq, the Trudeau government gave Telesat $1.4 billion, $790 million as a repayable loan and $650 million treated as a preferred share equity investment.

The promise at the time was that Telesat Lightspeed would be, “connecting approximately 40,000 households in rural and remote regions.” That isn’t exactly happening, not directly.

Here’s the real problem: Starlink, operated by Musk, already had more than 400,000 customers in Canada, according to a National Post report earlier this year.

Basically, Musk’s Starlink is thumping Telesat in its own backyard.

This is the aspect — servicing remote areas — of Lightspeed’s capabilities that Trudeau played up during Friday’s announcement, not national defence. Even at that, Lightspeed is primarily a commercial project, not a military one, so Trudeau is effectively investing taxpayer money in a commercial operation.

They are now trying to play the patriotism card – I thought patriotism was always bad to progressives – in claiming Telesat is a Canadian company. It is headquartered in Ottawa, but its major shareholders are based in New York and Chicago.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
111,950
12,366
113
Low Earth Orbit
“Hey @elonmusk — how much would it cost to provide @Starlink to every Canadian household that doesn’t have high speed?” the parliamentarian asked on X on Saturday morning. “If this $2.14 BILLION plan is the panacea of expanding access, competition, and service — where is the interest from private investors and banks?”

The billionaire founder of Tesla responded to Barrett later in the day, asserting that Starlink could have provided the service for, “Less than half that amount.” Musk’s comments prompted Barrett to call it “a common-sense solution for Canada.”
In a major announcement on Friday, when Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced a $2.14 billion loan to Telesat, a Canadian satellite company. The money given to this publicly traded company is to support their low-Earth-orbit satellite program known as Lightspeed.

“Designed, manufactured, and operated in Canada, the Telesat Lightspeed satellite network will be the largest in Canadian history – creating thousands of jobs, growing our economy, and getting high-speed Internet to Canadians,” Trudeau said at the announcement.

“How much would it cost to provide Starlink to every Canadian household that doesn’t have high speed?” Conservative MP Michael Barrett asked.

“Less than half that amount,” Musk replied.
That’s all it took for top Liberals from Champagne, to Diweldi, to Chrystia Freeland’s chief of staff and others to attack the Conservatives and anyone noting that Elon Musk’s Starlink is far cheaper as being against Quebec jobs.

Kind of has an SNC-Lavalin aroma to it. Realizing that making this argument was a bad look, the Liberals later switched to saying the Conservatives wanted to hand over Canada’s defence satellite capability to Musk. Of course, no one made that argument, and the government’s main selling point was that this investment would bring high-speed internet to rural and remote areas for homes and businesses.

It’s not the first time they’ve invested in Telesat, a former Crown corporation that was privatized by the Chretien Liberals in the 1990s and went public in November 2021. Shortly before Telesat began trading on the Nasdaq, the Trudeau government gave Telesat $1.4 billion, $790 million as a repayable loan and $650 million treated as a preferred share equity investment.

The promise at the time was that Telesat Lightspeed would be, “connecting approximately 40,000 households in rural and remote regions.” That isn’t exactly happening, not directly.

Here’s the real problem: Starlink, operated by Musk, already had more than 400,000 customers in Canada, according to a National Post report earlier this year.

Basically, Musk’s Starlink is thumping Telesat in its own backyard.

This is the aspect — servicing remote areas — of Lightspeed’s capabilities that Trudeau played up during Friday’s announcement, not national defence. Even at that, Lightspeed is primarily a commercial project, not a military one, so Trudeau is effectively investing taxpayer money in a commercial operation.

They are now trying to play the patriotism card – I thought patriotism was always bad to progressives – in claiming Telesat is a Canadian company. It is headquartered in Ottawa, but its major shareholders are based in New York and Chicago.
So is it a defense program or high speed interweb? Or is this like 5G, promoted as the greatest thing ever but 100% useless to the consumer that funds it?
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
25,146
9,062
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Kind of has an SNC-Lavalin aroma to it. Realizing that making this argument was a bad look, the Liberals later switched to saying the Conservatives wanted to hand over Canada’s defence satellite capability to Musk. Of course, no one made that argument, and the government’s main selling point was that this investment would bring high-speed internet to rural and remote areas for homes and businesses.
So is it a defense program or high speed interweb? Or is this like 5G, promoted as the greatest thing ever but 100% useless to the consumer that funds it?
Time will tell.
 
  • Like
Reactions: petros