#1 reason I like seines better. Although I have seen them cleaning if there were not too many in a set.Yup but those are delivered round to the packer , no dressing needed .
#1 reason I like seines better. Although I have seen them cleaning if there were not too many in a set.Yup but those are delivered round to the packer , no dressing needed .
Can't import 400 000+ immigrants and not expect housing problems. Especially in areas where building permits are scarcer than trustworthy politicians.Chris Selley: We're not even close to ready for the population growth we're getting — National Post
This isn’t an issue that some backroom genius can spin away. It’s visceral for everyone, from aspiring homeowners to long-time renters to would-be immigrantsapple.news
For personal use and friend sales .#1 reason I like seines better. Although I have seen them cleaning if there were not too many in a set.
No, they were going to Seafoods cannery in Pt. Hardy. Get a better price cleaned and when there are not many fish it helps.For personal use and friend sales .
Maybe it was a while ago when I fished but do recall that they had a couple of boats fishing for them .No, they were going to Seafoods cannery in Pt. Hardy. Get a better price cleaned and when there are not many fish it helps.
Well, the reverse of that is you can bring in 400k along with the other increases in your population BUT - you DO have to plan for the problems and deal with that.Can't import 400 000+ immigrants and not expect housing problems. Especially in areas where building permits are scarcer than trustworthy politicians.
Because everyone deserves a home .Well, the reverse of that is you can bring in 400k along with the other increases in your population BUT - you DO have to plan for the problems and deal with that.
We should almost have a law that says max immigration allowed at any time has to be equal to the new homes etc that we have to support them. Want to bring in 400k new people? FIne - we need to have 300 k homes above our current needs coming online when they get here. Otherwise, nope.
Because if people have no where to live they tend to either become violent or communist. And we don't need them burning or voting in anything in that state.Because everyone deserves a home .
And a similar number being born.With over 300,000 kicking the bucket (and climbing) per year.....
They do when they grow up. Which is the problem we're seeing now - millenials and gen x'ers have no homes they can afford to buy because they're priced out of the market due to a lack of supply. In fact, among that group home ownership is the lowest it's ever been and getting worse.Babies dont buy houses.
Goal post movement....They do when they grow up.
There's no goal post movement in the slightest. At any given time a percent of our population is young, medium and old. That's an ongoing cycle. Babies still need a home to live in.Goal post movement....
30 years from now when boomers and Gen X are long gone
Will they spit out 2 full kids to replace themselves?
Not even the boomers will be gone by that point. And the gen x will be retirement age but most of them will be alive in 30 years. Gen x ended in the early 80s, Those guys are in their 40's, they're not likely to be dead by 70.30 years from now when boomers and Gen X are long gone
No - we'll immigrate replacements. That's what's happening now.Will they spit out 2 full kids to replace themselves?
OH - ABSOLUTELY!!! Statcan has NO idea what they're talking about. We're only getting a TOTAL of 93 thousand new canadians per year, everyone knows that! You're a mathimatical genus, you've just solved the housing crisis!! THANKS Petros!!!400,000 - 307,000dead = 93,000 new Canadians per year.
Sure, absolutely if you say so!!! I trust you over statcan any day. Your math skills are unparallelled - thank god we have you!307,000 arent dying? Cool.
You're WAY smarter than them! And for SURE we're not going to have ANY immigration so absolutely we're only going to have a population growth of 93,000! You're amazing - we'll TOTALLY have enough homes now!! You should be prime minister!Stats Can says 1.47 births per woman. Stats Can say 307 000 kick the bucket. Is 93,000 enough to replace the 0.53 not being replaced by birth?