All lies! Every argument they make are lies & people are falling for them. When actual research is done, none of what they're claiming is true!Will he get this one right?
After Grossly Inflating COVID Death Rates, the WHO’s Terrorist Connected Director General Tedros Now Claims Climate Change is the ‘Single Biggest Health Threat Facing Humanity’
By Joe Hoft
Published October 12, 2021 at 6:27pm
465 Comments
In its report titled “The Health Argument for Climate Action,” the W.H.O. calls climate change the “single biggest health threat facing humanity” and calls on governments to “act to tackle the climate crisis, restore biodiversity, and protect health.”
“While no one is safe from the health impacts of climate change, they are disproportionately felt by the most vulnerable and disadvantaged,” the report asserts.
To “avert catastrophic health impacts and prevent millions of climate change-related deaths,” the world must limit temperature rise to 1.5°C, the report states, referencing the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
“The climate crisis is upon us, powered by our addiction to fossil fuels,” writes Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, W.H.O. Director-General in his foreword to the report. “The consequences for our health are real and often devastating.”
It's Climate Change I tell'ya!! IT'S CLIMATE CHANGE!!
- Thread starter B00Mer
- Start date
The Chinese Communist Party is Behind a U.S. ‘Climate Change’ Activism Conference.
Next time you see a climate change protest in the news, be aware it may be backed by the Chinese Communist Party.by Natalie Winters
October 14, 2021
The entity sponsoring the recent conference, the China-United States Exchange Foundation (CUSEF), is part of Beijing’s “United Front” effort, which the U.S. government identifies as seeking to “to co-opt and neutralize sources of potential opposition to the policies and authority of its ruling Chinese Communist Party” and “influence foreign governments to take actions or adopt positions supportive of Beijing.”
CUSEF’s website notes that it “sponsored” the Sino-American Youth Dialogue on Climate Change, carried out in collaboration with two schools: the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Tsinghua University......More
We are such fools!
It wouldn't surprise me at all if the CCP is behind all of this or at the very least, supported it through financing of Climate Change Activism, along with the likes of George Soros & all his foundations. They want to ensure we never get back to where we were and that the West falls totally on its ass!! The only way is to destroy the economies of Western Countries, spew false allegations as to who and what we are & teach our kids to hate everything we stand for as a society.
Wouldn't surprise me a bit.
It wouldn't surprise me at all if the CCP is behind all of this or at the very least, supported it through financing of Climate Change Activism, along with the likes of George Soros & all his foundations. They want to ensure we never get back to where we were and that the West falls totally on its ass!! The only way is to destroy the economies of Western Countries, spew false allegations as to who and what we are & teach our kids to hate everything we stand for as a society.
Wouldn't surprise me a bit.
Wow, so China has weaponized Climate Change Activism against the USA inevitability for gains financially & for power in general….& the USA has weaponized Climate Change Activism against Canada for gains financially & for power in general….so what’s the next link in the chain….? How does Trudeau respond? Attack AB & SK himself or find a smaller fish elsewhere?
He is going to bring in more immigrants to ensure we can never meet our commitments to allow permanency of carbon taxes .
And our hoofus goofus pro climate change supporting buffoon, the PM of Canukistan, still says that he loves and admires his communist China. Go figure, eh?
GOLDSTEIN: Wilkinson's climate change math does not add up
Author of the article:Lorrie Goldstein
Publishing date:Oct 16, 2021 • 11 hours ago • 3 minute read • 6 Comments
Canada's Minister of the Environment and Climate Change Jonathan Wilkinson attends a news conference at the Dominion Arboretum in Ottawa December 11, 2020.
Canada's Minister of the Environment and Climate Change Jonathan Wilkinson attends a news conference at the Dominion Arboretum in Ottawa December 11, 2020. PHOTO BY BLAIR GABLE /REUTERS
Article content
Today, let’s consider the bafflegab Environment Minister Jonathan Wilkinson has been spouting recently about the Liberal record on climate change versus the Conservative one.
Advertisement
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Article content
It’s an appropriate time to do so as a huge, 12-day United Nations conference on climate change in Glasgow, Scotland will begin Nov. 1, when Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Wilkinson will be talking about the issue endlessly.
In a recent interview with Mercedes Stephenson on Global News’ The West Block, Wilkinson lauded the Trudeau government’s record on reducing greenhouse gas emissions, saying Stephen Harper and the Conservatives did “zero on climate” for a decade leading up to their defeat by the Liberals in 2015.
By contrast, Wilkinson said, the Liberals have reduced Canada’s emissions to “1% below where we were in 2005.”
Except Harper and the Conservatives weren’t in power in 2005.
Paul Martin and the Liberals were.
Advertisement
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Article content
MORE ON THIS TOPIC
When former Green Party leader Elizabeth May and Bloc Quebecois leader Yves-François Blanchet simultaneously declared the “death of oil” at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic last year, they revealed a fundamental misunderstanding of the law of supply and demand.
GOLDSTEIN: Reports of the ‘death of oil’ greatly exaggerated
Steam and exhaust rise from different companies on a cold winter day on January 6, 2017 in Oberhausen, Germany.
GOLDSTEIN: Emissions soaring as UN climate conference approaches
A new report by Parliamentary Budget Officer Yves Giroux explains why the Trudeau government won't hit its latest target for 2030.
GOLDSTEIN: Trudeau's prohibitively expensive climate plan comes with imaginary climate targets
Canada’s emissions in 2005, the last year the Liberals were in power prior to being defeated by the Conservatives on Jan. 23, 2006, were 739 million tonnes.
In 2019, the latest figures available for the Trudeau government, emissions were 730 million tonnes.
So Wilkinson should have said that Canada’s emissions in 2019 under the Trudeau Liberals were down by 1% from the Martin Liberals in 2005.
When the Harper Conservatives came to power at the start of 2006, they inherited the Martin/Liberal record for 2005 of 739 million tonnes of emissions.
Advertisement
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Article content
When they were defeated by the Trudeau Liberals late in 2015, Canada’s emissions were 723 million tonnes.
So the Harper Conservative record was to reduce the emission levels they inherited from the Martin Liberals by 16 million tonnes, from 739 to 723, or 2.2%.
Given that Canada’s emissions under the Trudeau government for 2019 (the latest figure available) were 730 megatonnes, the Trudeau Liberals have increased Canada’s emissions by seven million tonnes, from 723 to 730, or almost 1%, compared to the Harper Conservatives when they lost power in 2015.
So in the real world, emissions went down in the Harper era and went up during Trudeau’s first term of office.
But the larger and more significant issue is that no Canadian government, Conservative or Liberal, has ever hit a single greenhouse gas emissions reduction target it has set in 33 years.
Advertisement
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Article content
Not the Brian Mulroney Progressive Conservatives, the Jean Chretien Liberals, the Martin Liberals, the Harper Conservatives or the Trudeau Liberals.
The only dramatic reductions in Canada’s emissions in the modern era have occurred not because of government policies, but because of global recessions when the demand for fossil fuel energy is reduced.
That includes the 2008-09 global recession that started with the subprime mortgage derivative scandal in the U.S., when the Harper Conservatives were in power, and the COVID-19 pandemic recession beginning in 2020 with the Trudeau Liberals in power.
It means when the Trudeau government announces its 2020 emissions in 2022 — again, always reported two years after the fact — emissions compared to 2019 will be down.
But emissions are already rising as the pandemic recession begins to fade, just as emissions rose in the wake of the 2008-09 recession.
Wilkinson can say Trudeau is the first Canadian PM to impose a carbon tax/price on Canadians and to commit over $100 billion of their money to fight climate change.
But in their first term of office from 2015-19 under Trudeau, the reality is that Canada’s emissions went up, whatever bafflegab Wilkinson is spouting now.
lgoldstein@postmedia.com
torontosun.com
Author of the article:Lorrie Goldstein
Publishing date:Oct 16, 2021 • 11 hours ago • 3 minute read • 6 Comments
Canada's Minister of the Environment and Climate Change Jonathan Wilkinson attends a news conference at the Dominion Arboretum in Ottawa December 11, 2020.
Canada's Minister of the Environment and Climate Change Jonathan Wilkinson attends a news conference at the Dominion Arboretum in Ottawa December 11, 2020. PHOTO BY BLAIR GABLE /REUTERS
Article content
Today, let’s consider the bafflegab Environment Minister Jonathan Wilkinson has been spouting recently about the Liberal record on climate change versus the Conservative one.
Advertisement
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Article content
It’s an appropriate time to do so as a huge, 12-day United Nations conference on climate change in Glasgow, Scotland will begin Nov. 1, when Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Wilkinson will be talking about the issue endlessly.
In a recent interview with Mercedes Stephenson on Global News’ The West Block, Wilkinson lauded the Trudeau government’s record on reducing greenhouse gas emissions, saying Stephen Harper and the Conservatives did “zero on climate” for a decade leading up to their defeat by the Liberals in 2015.
By contrast, Wilkinson said, the Liberals have reduced Canada’s emissions to “1% below where we were in 2005.”
Except Harper and the Conservatives weren’t in power in 2005.
Paul Martin and the Liberals were.
Advertisement
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Article content
When former Green Party leader Elizabeth May and Bloc Quebecois leader Yves-François Blanchet simultaneously declared the “death of oil” at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic last year, they revealed a fundamental misunderstanding of the law of supply and demand.
GOLDSTEIN: Reports of the ‘death of oil’ greatly exaggerated
Steam and exhaust rise from different companies on a cold winter day on January 6, 2017 in Oberhausen, Germany.
GOLDSTEIN: Emissions soaring as UN climate conference approaches
A new report by Parliamentary Budget Officer Yves Giroux explains why the Trudeau government won't hit its latest target for 2030.
GOLDSTEIN: Trudeau's prohibitively expensive climate plan comes with imaginary climate targets
Canada’s emissions in 2005, the last year the Liberals were in power prior to being defeated by the Conservatives on Jan. 23, 2006, were 739 million tonnes.
In 2019, the latest figures available for the Trudeau government, emissions were 730 million tonnes.
So Wilkinson should have said that Canada’s emissions in 2019 under the Trudeau Liberals were down by 1% from the Martin Liberals in 2005.
When the Harper Conservatives came to power at the start of 2006, they inherited the Martin/Liberal record for 2005 of 739 million tonnes of emissions.
Advertisement
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Article content
When they were defeated by the Trudeau Liberals late in 2015, Canada’s emissions were 723 million tonnes.
So the Harper Conservative record was to reduce the emission levels they inherited from the Martin Liberals by 16 million tonnes, from 739 to 723, or 2.2%.
Given that Canada’s emissions under the Trudeau government for 2019 (the latest figure available) were 730 megatonnes, the Trudeau Liberals have increased Canada’s emissions by seven million tonnes, from 723 to 730, or almost 1%, compared to the Harper Conservatives when they lost power in 2015.
So in the real world, emissions went down in the Harper era and went up during Trudeau’s first term of office.
But the larger and more significant issue is that no Canadian government, Conservative or Liberal, has ever hit a single greenhouse gas emissions reduction target it has set in 33 years.
Advertisement
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Article content
Not the Brian Mulroney Progressive Conservatives, the Jean Chretien Liberals, the Martin Liberals, the Harper Conservatives or the Trudeau Liberals.
The only dramatic reductions in Canada’s emissions in the modern era have occurred not because of government policies, but because of global recessions when the demand for fossil fuel energy is reduced.
That includes the 2008-09 global recession that started with the subprime mortgage derivative scandal in the U.S., when the Harper Conservatives were in power, and the COVID-19 pandemic recession beginning in 2020 with the Trudeau Liberals in power.
It means when the Trudeau government announces its 2020 emissions in 2022 — again, always reported two years after the fact — emissions compared to 2019 will be down.
But emissions are already rising as the pandemic recession begins to fade, just as emissions rose in the wake of the 2008-09 recession.
Wilkinson can say Trudeau is the first Canadian PM to impose a carbon tax/price on Canadians and to commit over $100 billion of their money to fight climate change.
But in their first term of office from 2015-19 under Trudeau, the reality is that Canada’s emissions went up, whatever bafflegab Wilkinson is spouting now.
lgoldstein@postmedia.com
GOLDSTEIN: Wilkinson's climate change math does not add up
Today, let’s consider the bafflegab Environment Minister Jonathan Wilkinson has been spouting recently about the Liberal record on climate change versus the Conserv…
China does own coal mines in BC. So the question is will they be allowed to export their own product to themselves?And our hoofus goofus pro climate change supporting buffoon, the PM of Canukistan, still says that he loves and admires his communist China. Go figure, eh?
I'm trying to figure out how turdOWE can have it both ways.
Is Tumbler ridge mine still allowed to bring in Chinese national workers even after loosing in court over union contracts?
this one is funny too!
I don't know anymore. The unions sort of lost out there. I have a buddy lives in TR, I will ask him.
This year's late fall compared to last year's early fall is a sign of climate change wow
A frost-less Fall, Canadian seasons shifting before our eyes (msn.com)
A frost-less Fall, Canadian seasons shifting before our eyes (msn.com)
I think Canada will probably be inundated with Climate Refugees over the next 10 to 20 years.
We'll have the proper climate and geography to sustain all of these newcomers whose own countries are burning to a crisp or ravaged by flooding.
We'll have the proper climate and geography to sustain all of these newcomers whose own countries are burning to a crisp or ravaged by flooding.
They had better like snow. The way it works now the vast majority of immigrants settle in the already overpopulated areas.
Breitbart News has listed 41 predictions that Climate Change will cause that Al Gore (who should be in jail) & his cult have issued starting in the 1960's. Each and every one have failed to come to fruition. So if they've made these 50 predictions which have not come true, and not even CLOSE to becoming true, why the hell would ANYONE believe what they're saying now? It's simply unbelievable and people are setting themselves up for becoming poorer in the future.
It's all about money & power and nothing to do with Climate. Shame on people for falling for this as we'll all be paying the price for this fool heartedness.
"Why would any sane person listen to someone with a 0-41 record?" Breitbart News
www.breitbart.com
It's all about money & power and nothing to do with Climate. Shame on people for falling for this as we'll all be paying the price for this fool heartedness.
"Why would any sane person listen to someone with a 0-41 record?" Breitbart News
Nolte: Climate 'Experts' Are 0-41 with Their Doomsday Predictions
For more than 50 years Climate Alarmists in the scientific community and environmental movement have not gotten one prediction correct.
www.breitbart.com
From the CBC even…
The biggest squeeze is on natural gas in Europe, which imports 90 per cent of its supply — largely from Russia — and where prices have risen to five times what they were at the start of the year, to 95 euros ($136 Cdn) from about 19 euros ($27) per megawatt hour.
It's hitting the Italian food chain hard, with methane prices expected to increase sixfold and push up the cost of drying grains. That could eventually raise the price of bread and pasta at supermarkets, but meat and dairy aisles are more vulnerable as beef and dairy farmers are forced to pay more for grain to feed their animals and pass the cost along to customers.
Holy Crap! Trudeau must be jizzing in his pants dreaming of dropping a carbon tax on these people only to retire to his pension & trust fund in a few years….
In the meantime, some gas-dependent European industries are throttling back production. German chemical companies BASF and SKW Piesteritz have cut output of ammonia, a key ingredient in fertilizer.
High energy prices already were hitting the region's farmers, who need diesel to operate machinery and heat to keep animals warm, said Greif, who grows corn to feed a bioenergy power facility that feeds emission-free energy into the power grid. Emission-Free energy from corn planted & harvested with diesel powered machinery instead of Unicorn Farts and wishful thoughts because of reality. Likewise in Italy, the cost of energy to process wheat and corn is expected to go up more than 600 per cent for the three months ending Dec. 31, according to the grain association.
Etc….more at the link above…& I just keep thinking about strictly electric vehicles after the woke ban on internal combustion vehicles & home heating with petroleum products…so more sucking on the electrical grid that’s stumbling already.
The biggest squeeze is on natural gas in Europe, which imports 90 per cent of its supply — largely from Russia — and where prices have risen to five times what they were at the start of the year, to 95 euros ($136 Cdn) from about 19 euros ($27) per megawatt hour.
It's hitting the Italian food chain hard, with methane prices expected to increase sixfold and push up the cost of drying grains. That could eventually raise the price of bread and pasta at supermarkets, but meat and dairy aisles are more vulnerable as beef and dairy farmers are forced to pay more for grain to feed their animals and pass the cost along to customers.
Holy Crap! Trudeau must be jizzing in his pants dreaming of dropping a carbon tax on these people only to retire to his pension & trust fund in a few years….
In the meantime, some gas-dependent European industries are throttling back production. German chemical companies BASF and SKW Piesteritz have cut output of ammonia, a key ingredient in fertilizer.
High energy prices already were hitting the region's farmers, who need diesel to operate machinery and heat to keep animals warm, said Greif, who grows corn to feed a bioenergy power facility that feeds emission-free energy into the power grid. Emission-Free energy from corn planted & harvested with diesel powered machinery instead of Unicorn Farts and wishful thoughts because of reality. Likewise in Italy, the cost of energy to process wheat and corn is expected to go up more than 600 per cent for the three months ending Dec. 31, according to the grain association.
Etc….more at the link above…& I just keep thinking about strictly electric vehicles after the woke ban on internal combustion vehicles & home heating with petroleum products…so more sucking on the electrical grid that’s stumbling already.
Skyrocketing propane prices could mean trouble for some Canadians this winter — CTV News
Canadian propane prices are skyrocketing alongside natural gas due, in large part, to growing demand from overseas markets, a price surge analysts say will have a big impact on rural Canadians this winter.
CANMORE, ALTA. -- Although plenty of attention has been given to the rising price of gasoline and natural gas, Canadian propane prices are also skyrocketing – a surge analysts say will have a big impact on rural Canadians this winter.
Propane, produced as a by-product of natural gas, has seen a dramatic price increase over the last three months, with prices in Edmonton, for example, soaring to US$1.40 per gallon from roughly US$0.25 per gallon, according to ATB Capital Markets.
With energy prices continuing to rise, consumers all over Canada will likely face higher heating costs this winter. While natural gas is the primary energy source for more than half of Canadian homes, nearly 1.4 million households rely on heating oil or other fuels, including propane, to heat their homes, especially those in rural areas.
“Propane is the main one for rural and off grid communities,” said Johnston. “It’s going to be much more expensive to fill those propane tanks this winter – and it’s not even cold yet.”