To IMPEACH ????
- Thread starter Ocean Breeze
- Start date
That's all they were is requests with no white house or DOJ lawyer's allowed to question or protect National interest. If they would have voted on the inquiry then the subpoenas would have meant something other than a polite request but it would have taken an extra amount of time to do it legally or properly.
The manuscript hasn't been viewed outside the Security council apparently so no way to verify the actual conversation written in the article. I agree Bolton not denying it may mean something, but then again why would he, preorders are flying off the shelf at Amazon over the controversy.
That's the message I've been trying to convey but it's not getting through. I'll be back tomorrow I have "bigger fish to fry" than this bull shit!
A Monstrous Fraud Was Perpetrated on the Senate, and John Roberts Had to Know It
WASHINGTON—I am glad I am leaving this place on Tuesday and heading to Iowa, where some decent people are contending to head a government and a political system so corrupted and debased at this point that the ship of state most closely resembles that homeless wandering garbage barge from 1987. The last thing I saw was Republican Senators John Barrasso and Mike Braun, red-faced and hollering, because some reporters wanted to know precisely how much of the bullshit slung by the White House lawyers on Monday afternoon anyone should believe.
Make no mistake about it. From about 4 o’clock, the time former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi rose to speak, until about 6, when a longtime lawyer for El Caudillo del Mar-a-Lago named Eric Herschmann wrapped up what amounted to some MAGA rally cosplay, a monstrously obvious fraud was perpetrated on the Senate, sitting as a court of impeachment. If any lawyer in any municipal court in the country had lied and misrepresented the facts of a case involving a speeding ticket as thoroughly as Bondi and Herschmann did here, that lawyer’s license would have been pulled by lunchtime. However, Chief Justice John Roberts, perhaps exhausted by the effort it took to extend the work of Breckinridge Long into the 21st century on Monday morning, sat there like one of the marble vice presidents in the niches of the visitor’s galleries above. A fraud was perpetrated on the court over which Roberts was presiding, and he had to know it.
More: https://www.esquire.com/news-politi...-bondi-trump-impeachment-defense-john-roberts
WASHINGTON—I am glad I am leaving this place on Tuesday and heading to Iowa, where some decent people are contending to head a government and a political system so corrupted and debased at this point that the ship of state most closely resembles that homeless wandering garbage barge from 1987. The last thing I saw was Republican Senators John Barrasso and Mike Braun, red-faced and hollering, because some reporters wanted to know precisely how much of the bullshit slung by the White House lawyers on Monday afternoon anyone should believe.
Make no mistake about it. From about 4 o’clock, the time former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi rose to speak, until about 6, when a longtime lawyer for El Caudillo del Mar-a-Lago named Eric Herschmann wrapped up what amounted to some MAGA rally cosplay, a monstrously obvious fraud was perpetrated on the Senate, sitting as a court of impeachment. If any lawyer in any municipal court in the country had lied and misrepresented the facts of a case involving a speeding ticket as thoroughly as Bondi and Herschmann did here, that lawyer’s license would have been pulled by lunchtime. However, Chief Justice John Roberts, perhaps exhausted by the effort it took to extend the work of Breckinridge Long into the 21st century on Monday morning, sat there like one of the marble vice presidents in the niches of the visitor’s galleries above. A fraud was perpetrated on the court over which Roberts was presiding, and he had to know it.
More: https://www.esquire.com/news-politi...-bondi-trump-impeachment-defense-john-roberts
Wrong again, squirt. You sure seem to like "shooting the messenger".
The codes: 52 U.S. Code § 30121, 18 U.S. Code § 595, 18 U.S. Code § 610, 2 U.S. Code § 192, 18 U.S. Code § 872, etc.
And again, they cannot indict the president. They first have to impeach him. You and JLM ignore that fact.
Last edited:
What date did he bring us to the brink of nuclear war and where did that happen? Accusations require a time and place and who all was involved?
Not just my opinion. The evidence proves it, but he hasn't been charged yet.
Gawd you Trumplicans are obtuse. lmao
Because the House investigation was just that, an investigation, and GOP members of the committees could ask questions.
This gets explained almost everywhere and people are still ignorant... FFS.
Subpoenas ARE legal and proper and they are typically NOT supposed to be ignored, but due to actually wanted to get this shyteshow done with, the Dems - IMO stupidly - said to nevermind and try to go with what they had instead of fighting calling in of people through the courts.
The Manuscript was given to the proper people at the WH to check for issues. Someone the leaked it out to the press and Bolton and his people are pizzed about it. And as you pointed out, he' snot saying it didn't happen. As for it being a ploy to sell his book... give me a break. Yeah it *seems* that way, but the WHITE HOUSE leaked it... so... someone there wanted Bolton's book to sell well? Or maybe someone saw/read it, and leaked it to cause this whole shyteshow to maybe conclude sooner? Who the hell knows.
Bolton's a lot of things including a warmongering azzhole, but I doubt he'd leak his own book just for sales.
Oh OK, he is guilty just not charged or convicted yet, gotcha
Guilty until proven innocent sounds like a fair system
