To IMPEACH ????
- Thread starter Ocean Breeze
- Start date
If you looked back over posts, I have already stated that Lev Parnas himself suggested that the texts related to the "stalking" were in fact false, that he too thought that they were in jest. So I have already questioned the veracity of said texts. Oh but wait, Lev Parnas can't possibly be telling the truth according to you right? So is this a lie as well? (See what I did there?)
Edited to add my post where I too called into question the stalking claims which is post #4061 of this thread:
So many twists and turns, Lev Parnas stated in an interview with Rachel Maddow yesterday that he thought Robert Hyde WAS just drunk (as Hyde claimed) in his texts where it appeared that he was tracking Yovanovich's movements in Ukraine. These texts sounded very sinister and continued over the course of a week. Was Hyde always drunk as Parnas claimed or is there more to this story? Is Lev covering to distance himself from involvement in this activity? Who the hell knows what the truth is at this point....
Last edited:
I have been setting my head on fire? That's a new one, hadn't heard that one before. Is this to replace the snowflake moniker? Okay then, do continue. If saying that someone having views that oppose yours is "setting their head on fire" and that somehow gets you through your day, have at it my friend.
Oh to add, still no response on shaking your fist at nepotism re Trump?
Last edited:
Prove it is bullshit. You can't. You can't even discuss or debate worth a crap. All you can do is be a childish, cranky, old curmudgeon and say, "bullshit", "fake news", "rent free", etc. whenever someone says something you don't like, as JLM said. You are a real life Archie Bunker, but unlike Carroll O'Connor, you can't even act worth a crap. lol
put before the image link, and then [/ img] after the link without a space after the /.
(if that's a word)
I agree, but some people simply haven't a decent enough attitude and temperament to be a leader of a country. Trump doesn't have either. Clinton has and she has good policies, but she has a tough time making them coherent.
Baloney. There simply wasn't enough evidence to indict Trump. There WAS enough evidence to indict several of his pals. As a few people pointed out, if Trump knew they were cuddling up to the Russians, then he was comlicit, if he didn't know his pals were cuddling up to Russians, then he's incompetent as a boss.
Good point. But the same can be said for Putin, Hussein, Stalin, Hitler, Mao Zedong, etc. and some people actually liked them, too.
His problem is that he is used to running his business his way and he can't seem to accept that the American forefathers set things out a certain way and he can't change them to suit himself.
Last edited:
They can call it "fake news", "biased", etc. but when it comes to actually debating the evidence, they are quite weak and so they come up with the whatabouts, ignore evidence, spin evidence and narrative, and other tactics.
Why are Dems. and Yovanovich demanding an inquiry into this and want it added to the Senate trial then?
And amusingly, why do you deny everything Lev Parnas has said except for this bit?
I mean, we all know, but you still seem blind to it.
He did introduce Rudy around Ukraine so there has to be a little in the mass of information that should be true, but it should be fully vetted before introduction into a trial. His track record is lagging badly right now.
Last edited:
But he was elected to that position. The people are always right . You are correct though , Hillary Clinton is incoherent.
His impeachment is solely a political ploy by the democrats, no partisan support at all .
If you had been paying attention you would know the whole Russian collusion narrative was created by the previous administration , the Justice department and alphabet agencies . All those smoking guns turned out to be American deep state actors . It has been well documented in these forums . It has been so discredited that it has completely disappeared from the news cycles .
Don’t let dislike of Trump blind you to reality . These same deep state actors could just as easily turn against someone you find more palatable.
Yes that is what started this whole mess , Joe Biden bragging about quid pro quo .
Why is Donald J. Trump the President of the United States of America ? What is the person the people elected doing again ?