Saudi Attacks & Repercussions.

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
President Game Show Host cannot get anything through Congress.

Start a war?

He can't build a wall
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
29,200
11,038
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Who is it that approves or disapproves of America going to war?

Is that the President?
He can't start a war.
Most ineffectual president ever


Their (the USA's) next election is too close to start a war. Not going to happen unless it can begin & end quickly without interfering with the coming election on November 3rd, 2020. Not enough time for American involvement in a war.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
29,200
11,038
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
I can see the USA arming the living Shiite out of Saudi Arabia (as long as Saudi oil is still traded with USD'$), but not direct involvement until after Nov 2020.
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
I can see the USA arming the living Shiite out of Saudi Arabia (as long as Saudi oil is still traded with USD'$), but not direct involvement until after Nov 2020.
They are already the third largest arms buyer on earth.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Nope, but he can call for a military strike
'there should be some degree of "measured response" to Iran's recent alleged aggression toward U.S. assets abroad'


From your own fukking post. You would allow an actual military strike on a country (an act of war you dumb shit) over some fact-less headline. How bug of an asshole are you trying to be towards a group that is 2B strong in numbers. I'm here to carve you a new one, it might sting a bit now and then. Price of moving up in intelligence because at the moment you are at ground fukking zero.
Lesson 1: When you should STFU.
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,041
6,160
113
Twin Moose Creek
'there should be some degree of "measured response" to Iran's recent alleged aggression toward U.S. assets abroad'


From your own fukking post. You would allow an actual military strike on a country (an act of war you dumb shit) over some fact-less headline. How bug of an asshole are you trying to be towards a group that is 2B strong in numbers. I'm here to carve you a new one, it might sting a bit now and then. Price of moving up in intelligence because at the moment you are at ground fukking zero.
Lesson 1: When you should STFU.

Your small talk isn't winning me over, I'm not going to let you have sex with me, Iran was the aggressor and can be viewed as an act of war, a retaliatory strike would not.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
They are already the third largest arms buyer on earth.
It doesn't matter, if Syria was lost using a covert war an open war against Iran would involve Russia and Russua will not fuk around, They will take out the World Bank dudes in a single day. Then 'Iran' does a 'moderate response' on the naval port in Bahrain and suddenly they become the official 'Coast Guard' for the area. The KSA and their Arab Spring partners would be under criminal charges in Jerusalem and the fines would make them as poor as Iran was in the 25 year after the Cia coup in 1953. There is no time limit on those types of crimes.


The US would resemble Gaza as Israel will be the star witness against her in exchange for a pat on the back and no sanctions.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Iran was the aggressor and can be viewed as an act of war, a retaliatory strike would not.
Well attack them then, . . . wtf, . . . To say you will and then nothing shows you are a paper fukking tiger and the world will laugh you off the wolds stage.
Do it, . . . typical schoolyard bully mentality.

Can you imagine if the black president had folded like a cheap card trick. As it is he might be the last white one for the next 250 years.
'Compounded implosion' is a runaway in that it always doubles in speed rather than 'a little bit at a time'.
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,041
6,160
113
Twin Moose Creek
Well attack them then, . . . wtf, . . . To say you will and then nothing shows you are a paper fukking tiger and the world will laugh you off the wolds stage.
Do it, . . . typical schoolyard bully mentality.
.

With my .22 tied to a drone? How do you want me to attack them? My paper airplane won't make it


Phuck me follow the conversation it was about if the POTUS can send troops not about supporting an attack, crawl back into your hole and take your meds man ( I think? I could be wrong on how often you try to hit on me) sheesh
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,331
9,516
113
Washington DC
he was being sarcastic/ ..and you know it ;-)
Not sure it is the US business to respond to the attacks in SA...........
Never said it was. Heck, I think the U.S. shoulda stayed out of the European part of WWII.

Only "just wars" we fought since the Civil War were stomping Japan and making the rubble jump in Afghanistan.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Phuck me follow the conversation it was about if the POTUS can send troops not about supporting an attack, crawl back into your hole and take your meds man ( I think? I could be wrong on how often you try to hit on me) sheesh
Fukking clueless in time/location/details, all in one short sentence. I have a new mission for your beloved .22short.
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
you said the president is the one who approves or disapproves of war.

that is not the case