What happened to planning with the marijuana venture?

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
It's been a full three years since the legalization of marijuana was first announced and we're arriving at the day and virtually no suppliers are even in place! As in any enterprise you would think distribution would be one of the first if not the very first concern. We've seen 5 year old kids running a lemonade stand do a better job. This is the same man who is supposedly running a country of 37 million people. Wouldn't a knowledgeable business man put out feelers for suppliers on day one and have them vetted? I can understand the Prime Minister being an idiot, but are we to believe that every one of what must be thousands in the organization is also an idiot. I find this to be UNBELIEVABLE!
 

Hoof Hearted

House Member
Jul 23, 2016
4,477
1,173
113
Trudeau pulled the whole idea of weed legalization out of his ass to get the youth vote.

Two days away and nobody knows wtf is going on...the purchase price...where you will/ will not be allowed to smoke...inhaling then driving a motor vehicle...the effects of using on young, developing minds...

But that's the upshot of it all when a lightweight makes a heavyweight decision.
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
lets see: Alberta created massive oil sands projects before they had a way to get their product to market.
So it seems like Canadian businesses are distribution challenged.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,553
8,150
113
B.C.
lets see: Alberta created massive oil sands projects before they had a way to get their product to market.
So it seems like Canadian businesses are distribution challenged.
No they just use less efficient methods , leaving money on the table . Pure taxable profit , o well it is not like we have any debt or are running surplus budgets .
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
lets see: Alberta created massive oil sands projects before they had a way to get their product to market.
So it seems like Canadian businesses are distribution challenged.


Different "ball game"- the oil sands were already there!
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
A shame the pipeline wasn't.

If only they had planned a little better....
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,888
126
63
It's been a full three years since the legalization of marijuana was first announced and we're arriving at the day and virtually no suppliers are even in place! As in any enterprise you would think distribution would be one of the first if not the very first concern. We've seen 5 year old kids running a lemonade stand do a better job. This is the same man who is supposedly running a country of 37 million people. Wouldn't a knowledgeable business man put out feelers for suppliers on day one and have them vetted? I can understand the Prime Minister being an idiot, but are we to believe that every one of what must be thousands in the organization is also an idiot. I find this to be UNBELIEVABLE!
Gubmint is like a fish, the rot starts at the head.
 

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,322
4,025
113
Edmonton
lets see: Alberta created massive oil sands projects before they had a way to get their product to market.
So it seems like Canadian businesses are distribution challenged.



Um, there was a pipeline - did you forget already? The old TMX - the current one is an EXPANSION of the existing DUH!!
 

OpposingDigit

Electoral Member
Aug 27, 2017
903
0
16
Marijuana was legalized at this time because with all the anti-terror and surveillance laws in place, there is no more need to use marijuana as a way or means of controlling/monitoring young people. All the anti-terror legislation offers more avenues of monitoring/control of young people than anti-drug laws ever did.
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,041
6,160
113
Twin Moose Creek
Hey OD it was a chance at taxing a product that was accepted by the general population, like reversing prohibition in the 30's, it was popular and the Gov. wasn't cashing in.
 

Hoof Hearted

House Member
Jul 23, 2016
4,477
1,173
113
"accepted by the general population"

A majority of Canadians also favour the death penalty. Would Trudeau then be correct to bring this back?
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
"accepted by the general population"

A majority of Canadians also favour the death penalty. Would Trudeau then be correct to bring this back?


YES, YES, YES! (for the likes of Dellen Millard and Paul Bernardo and two or three more) :) Oh yeah better add Pickton too.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,617
14,358
113
Low Earth Orbit
Marijuana was legalized at this time because with all the anti-terror and surveillance laws in place, there is no more need to use marijuana as a way or means of controlling/monitoring young people. All the anti-terror legislation offers more avenues of monitoring/control of young people than anti-drug laws ever did.
Are you serious?

It's gone from 8 ways to get busted to 28 under legalization.
 

OpposingDigit

Electoral Member
Aug 27, 2017
903
0
16
Hi! Twin Moose

You asked about taxation ......

Just remember how many tax dollars went to fund the justice system and police during the past 50 years. Do you know how many judges and courtrooms and jails they had to build in order to enforce what the government knew was uncontrollable?

The government knew it was harmless as well and knew it was not addictive as alcohol was or cigarettes. But they had to invent levers of control within society because young people are the revolutionaries within all societies. It worked really well during the 1960's and 70's and with the hippies.

Imagine the size of a bale of Marijuana? Imagine the smell of it? There were millions and millions of these 400 pound bales (not little 7 gram packets ..... but bales) travelling across North America. Today they claim that they can prevent a terrorist from travelling around but they could not prevent a 400 pound smelly bale of pot travelling around for the past 50 years.

The cops sort of let it happen in order to continue "Selected Enforcement". The cops used drugs as a reason to stop and frisk. A reason to search a home, a reason to create a department of informants and on and on. Banking systems were monitored.

As an example, I remember when the Supreme Court said that it was illegal for the cops to stop and search a car without just cause.

Within a year, the cops invented the "Town Drunk" as a bogeyman and began to stop cars at Christmas time and then it was May 24th weekend and in less than 5 years it was 24-7.

It's all about control. And today they have all the anti-terror legislation, all the informants, all the banking systems all the telephone calls and contact information, facial recognition, and cell phone locations ...... They don't need to criminalize drugs anymore.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
. . . . cough, how many lbs do I need to make tea, smoking is killing me, . . . cough.

Shit, anybody got a lighter I can borrow.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
It needs to be within 48 hours of the guilty verdict, bit of heroin before the head fall off the shoulders in one blow. No hacking allowed.