Fake hooman... or should I say hoomanoidFake History
(*snicker*)
Fake hooman... or should I say hoomanoidFake History
It depends on who's law was applied. My Huegenot ancestors that escaped death in France would have left from there illegally. My Anabaptist refugee ancestors who came here in 1702 to escape death in Europe were certainly "illegals to be killed on sight" in any Catholic land. My Jacobite Scots were "ethnically cleansed" and my family were specifically allied with the Stewarts and therefore were banished for their politics. My United Empire Loyalist ancestors were illegals in the new United States republic and therefore headed North as refugees (surviving considerable privation on the way). One of the two sets (from Pennsylvania .. the others from New York) started from scratch clearing the virgin wilderness twice in three generation.
They were all illegals. The Crown took them in, here but every group were considered criminal illegals to be put to the sword by somebody.
How about your people, pigs? Did they chuf-chuff out west in a Tin Lizzie and declare that THEY were entitled but no one else is?
Fake hooman... or should I say hoomanoid
(*snicker*)
I think the question was did they enter Canada illegally?
Ever heard of the UELs? the "Late Loyalists", the Underground Railway? Vietnam War Evaders? The current crop who have had their stay rescinded by the US?
Canada didn't exist, back then. The UELs arguably were illegal at first before the Crown had time to react and provide for them. There was considerable starvation and the Loyalists wre initially "held" in camps at the border.
I raise you one *snicker* and add a [salty!]
Canada didn't exist, back then. The UELs arguably were illegal at first before the Crown had time to react and provide for them. There was considerable starvation and the Loyalists wre initially "held" in camps at the border.
So they came in through proper channels same as my ancestors
If Cliffy isn't in his right mind then perhaps that also applies to this as well and that you agree simply means you are as insane as he is rather than this one agreement is his one sliver of sanity.I never would have thought Cliffy supported the Spanish Conquests of Mexico and Central America and their rights to claim the South West U.S over the indigenous Native Americans.
But then again Cliffy denies science and believes that humans evolved in the Americas.
The rich got seats and food, the others got a lump on the head and steel bracelets and all the rats they can eat. Which group you want to tackle first. The Royals that were criminals has the most drama but after the opening chapter it is just the EU history repeated at a bloodier level."Proper channels" did not exist in the 18th century, no matter how you convolute history.
huh?
If you don't abide knucklehead justyns' open arms welcome to illegal border hoppers your a racist. I'm uncertain how he equates racism with a woman seeking an answer from him but he's an arrogant sob so best not try to make sense of anything he blurts out.
https://globalnews.ca/video/4397691/trudeau-calls-heckler-racist-during-event-in-quebec
Wheat did she ask Trudeau ?She is a racist. She belongs to one of those anti-immigrant Quebec nationalist organizations.
She is a racist. She belongs to one of those anti-immigrant Quebec nationalist organizations.
She is a racist. She belongs to one of those anti-immigrant Quebec nationalist organizations.
Are you implying that Trudeau knew her history before calling her a racist? How would he know this...unless you are saying that this was somehow all a PR setup by Trudeau? Or maybe Trudeau can see peoples activist history simply by looking into their eyes? You think lil potato is a savant?
Or maybe you're simply using her baggage to push your narrative that anyone who asks the question about who is going to pay for Trudeau's illegal border crossers is a racist.
I am guessing from the blather she was spouting Trudeau may have figured it out. In any case I could care less that a racist is called a racist.
It does appear that Trudeau's intolerant attitude may have coincidently found the mark in this case. I wouldn't be giving him too much credit however, it seems to simply be a case of intolerance stumbling across intolerance. Even a busted clock is right twice a day.
Interesting though, was Trudeau able or willing to offer an answer to the legitimate question regarding who's paying the 164 million dollar bill for his stupidity in inviting the world to treat our border as a doormat? No??
Yeah...figures.
A Liberal Racist calling other people racists... that's the Alt-Left for you.