Whats the prob liberals enjoy/ed tax payer funded propaganda for years on cbc, torstar too but it's their dime they invest in lib bs.
Was the Toronto Star funded by the public? The CBC represented all canadian views until conservatives in North America decided the enlightenment and civil rights was bad for them and they had no chance of winning their objectives if people could think. The CBC is the reason why union participation is still around 30% in canada while it has totally collapsed in the usa. The number of new immigrants i've met who love the cbc and make a point of listening to it is a wonderful thing for civic society and diversity and bodes well for the future of the country. The right has not yet destroyed the word 'liberal' in canada so good luck with that.Whats the prob liberals enjoy/ed tax payer funded propaganda for years on cbc, torstar too but it's their dime they invest in lib bs.
We argue that all the difficulties this concept has encountered in economics are due to a vague and excessively broad*definition. For this reason, we restrict social*capital*to the set of values and beliefs that help cooperation—which for clarity we label*civic capital.Whats the prob liberals enjoy/ed tax payer funded propaganda for years on cbc, torstar too but it's their dime they invest in lib bs.
Oh piss off. It's the SEVENTH LARGEST GOVT IN CANADA because it wants to be, not because it needs to be. Funny how the City Council can grow in size without so much as a nod towards the democratic process, but suddenly it's anti-democratic to reduce the size without so much as a nod towards the democratic process? F*cking spare me.I know that you're not the brightest but try to follow.
You have the sixth largest government in Canada represented by 44 elected councellors making decisions on behalf of the citizens of the city. Along comes a Tamany Hall Fatcat from the outside who banishes half of the local representatives ... by decree, not consulting a single soul because he has scores to settle ... and you have only 22 people, friendly to the Fat-cat, now making the decisions for THE SIXTH LARGEST GOVERNMENT IN CANADA.
Could you imagine what would happen in Libetarian, tough guy Alberta if the Feds suddenly decreed without consultation that Alberta can only have 25 members of her Provincial Parlianent because we need to beat back big government? Not only that, make sure that the ridings with representation are friendly to the Federal Prime Minister who made the decree to get even with Albertans that he doesn't like? What do you think will happen?
Forcing a government that disburses more money than most provinces do into being run by less that two dozen carefully chosen buddies, is big, corrupt, Tanany Hall government at it's worst. If you were a real Conservative, you would get that. If you are merely part of the current crop of Trump-me-too-Neo-Nazis you will never get it because it far surpasses your intellectual capacities. You obviously don't have any use for democracy on the local level, which is the foundation cornerstone of North American democracy going right back to the beginning.
Don't go to the North part of that at night.
Could it be that Ford feels that the MSM won't cover anything he does in an unbiased way, thus requiring him to get his msg out another way? That's absurd isn't it?
There are alternate ways of getting his message out that has absolutely no cost to the taxpayer (aka Trump). Hmmmmm????
Whats the prob liberals enjoy/ed tax payer funded propaganda for years on cbc, torstar too but it's their dime they invest in lib bs.
Godwin’s here.That's how Goebbels saw it too, I'm sure.
I love these "real" Tories who believe in a centrally controlled City Hall by as few people as possible, selected by a single leader and official, government sanctioned news outlets.
You aren't Conservatives. You are something else from the political Right but you are not Conservatives.
Why do you whine about guns when motor vehicles are involved in WAY more death and injury than firearms? Very few of which are the result of gang related activities.It's fine to have your own news channel but it can't be your only communication with the public.
This is my problem with the NRA.
Why are they not out there advocating for 1ST amendment rights?
Walter's here.
That was a frivolous statement.Why do you whine about guns when motor vehicles are involved in WAY more death and injury than firearms? Very few of which are the result of gang related activities.
Or perhaps Hillary?
She has been suspiciously silent about all of this.