Heat wave smashes records around the world — a look at the sizzling temperatures

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
that is a very impressive blog post for a climate change denier to hang his ignorance on.
 

Buffy

Nominee Member
Jan 3, 2017
95
57
18
U.S.A.
Killed by white nationalist climate deniers!!!
One might think that after more than three decades of consistently failed projections, predictions and promises and with no supporting empirical, observational data to support their silly hypothesis the hard-core Anthropogenic Global Warmongers would consider that just maybe they are as ignorant as we've been saying for all these years. You would be wrong. John Stuart Mill (1803-1876) renowned liberal philosopher and economist once noted; " He who knows only his own side of a case knows little of that".
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
Why would we continue to believe when there are so many random experts on the Internet to tell us otherwise.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,608
8,171
113
B.C.
Note "The Daily Caller"

The daily birdcage liner.



ie Random Internet Climate Expert.

Take a number. The line starts waaaaaaaaay back there on this forum, Newest Random internet Climate Expert.
So let’s shot the messenger eh George .
 

Buffy

Nominee Member
Jan 3, 2017
95
57
18
U.S.A.
Isn't it curious how the purportedly curious but apparently incurious usually respond to those who aren't inclined to swallow the propaganda which so enthralls the incurious with snarky and demeaning personal attacks rather than data? (Nice run-on sentence eh?)

I don't claim to be a meteorologist or a climate expert, internet or otherwise. I will however claim to be a whole lot less gullible than you oh curious one.

I'll challenge you and give you the opportunity to see if you are willing to put your brain where your mouth is.

There are two parts to the challenge both of which even you should be able to handle in less than thirty minutes. (an informed person could do it in less than 5)

First, actually read the article in the dreaded Daily Caller and then explain what is incorrect about Mr. Watts' assessment and why. Explain why he is not credible.

Second, over the past months there have been many articles published regarding the increasingly rapid melting of the West Antarctic Ice Sheets. Explain why is this happening and why the East Antarctic Ice Sheets are not affected? BTW, please note sources and do not include organizations like NASA,NOAA, U.S. Snow and Ice Survey, University of Pennsylvania and the University of East Anglia as they have been shown many times to massage, manipulate, ignore, eliminate, cherry pick and in other ways falsify data in order to hew to the narrative you so readily accept. (CO2. burning coal, oil and natural gas blah, blah, blah.)

Get ready,

Get set,

Research.......the clock's ticking smart guy.

Isn't it curious how the purportedly curious but apparently incurious usually respond to those who aren't inclined to swallow the propaganda which so enthralls the incurious with snarky and demeaning personal attacks rather than data? (Nice run-on sentence eh?)

I don't claim to be a meteorologist or a climate expert, internet or otherwise. I will however claim to be a whole lot less gullible than you oh curious one.

I'll challenge you and give you the opportunity to see if you are willing to put your brain where your mouth is.

There are two parts to the challenge both of which even you should be able to handle in less than thirty minutes. (an informed person could do it in less than 5)

First, actually read the article in the dreaded Daily Caller and then explain what is incorrect about Mr. Watts' assessment and why. Explain why he is not credible.

Second, over the past months there have been many articles published regarding the increasingly rapid melting of the West Antarctic Ice Sheets. Explain why is this happening and why the East Antarctic Ice Sheets are not affected? BTW, please note sources and do not include organizations like NASA,NOAA, U.S. Snow and Ice Survey, University of Pennsylvania and the University of East Anglia as they have been shown many times to massage, manipulate, ignore, eliminate, cherry pick and in other ways falsify data in order to hew to the narrative you so readily accept. (CO2. burning coal, oil and natural gas blah, blah, blah.)

Get ready,

Get set,

Research.......the clock's ticking smart guy.
Okay, I'll give you a hint. Helium-3.
 

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
Isn't it curious how the purportedly curious but apparently incurious usually respond to those who aren't inclined to swallow the propaganda which so enthralls the incurious with snarky and demeaning personal attacks rather than data? (Nice run-on sentence eh?)

I don't claim to be a meteorologist or a climate expert, internet or otherwise. I will however claim to be a whole lot less gullible than you oh curious one.

I'll challenge you and give you the opportunity to see if you are willing to put your brain where your mouth is.

There are two parts to the challenge both of which even you should be able to handle in less than thirty minutes. (an informed person could do it in less than 5)

First, actually read the article in the dreaded Daily Caller and then explain what is incorrect about Mr. Watts' assessment and why. Explain why he is not credible.

Second, over the past months there have been many articles published regarding the increasingly rapid melting of the West Antarctic Ice Sheets. Explain why is this happening and why the East Antarctic Ice Sheets are not affected? BTW, please note sources and do not include organizations like NASA,NOAA, U.S. Snow and Ice Survey, University of Pennsylvania and the University of East Anglia as they have been shown many times to massage, manipulate, ignore, eliminate, cherry pick and in other ways falsify data in order to hew to the narrative you so readily accept. (CO2. burning coal, oil and natural gas blah, blah, blah.)

Get ready,

Get set,

Research.......the clock's ticking smart guy.

What a ridiculous post. You challenge someone to prove a point by referring to climatic incidents that are so precise finding information on them would be an amazing challenge, and then you go on to state that you will not accept any accredited scientific sources as proof. Your idea of science and an intelligent article is a complete joke. Here, I'll give you a challenge - tell me why each of the last three decades has been warmer than the last. Feel free to use the National Enquirer as your source.