Western U.S. states disregard Trump and join BC in fight against Climate Change

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Trump has furthered the liberal agenda more than any other president in history. :lol:


Western U.S. states disregard Trump to form united front with B.C. in fight against climate change

Governments from western U.S. states have been meeting with B.C's provincial government for 10 years as part of an initiative called the Pacific Coast Collaborative (PCC) — but this year the U.S. governors seem to be putting more value on this cross-border relationship.

Following the leaders' meeting Friday morning, Washington Gov. Jay Inslee was particularly vocal about the need for collaboration, given what he sees as a lack of leadership coming from the White House.

"We do not have a federal government that is protective of our state right now," said Inslee.

The Pacific Coast Collaborative is an agreement between B.C., the state of Washington, the state of Oregon, and the state of California to work together on protecting the environment, boosting their respective economies, and as of this year, responding to the overdose crisis.

Emphasis on climate change

When the leaders spoke at a news conference following their closed-door meeting, the emphasis was on tackling climate change.

"On the West Coast, we know that climate change is not a hoax. It doesn't matter what foolishness comes out of the White House, the leaders on the West Coast are united in understanding science," said Inslee.

Inslee also told reporters his government feels very vulnerable right now, which is why it is looking to its neighbours for support.

"We have to recognize a reality that we have a brighter future and a cleaner future, and it's being realized under the leadership of your premier and we stand with him up and down the Pacific Coast," Inslee said, in reference to Premier John Horgan.

He said Washington is learning from B.C.'s carbon pricing system, and that the state intends to have a similar model in place down the line.

Western U.S. states disregard Trump to form united front with B.C. in fight against climate change - British Columbia - CBC News
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,





 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
Its like withdrawing from the Paris accords.

It simply energized the states to pursue real change.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
If we sent all the Leftard so back east where they came from we would not have this problem. That includes Washington and Oregon as well. Not much hope for Calfornia. Too much inbreeding.
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,619
6,262
113
Olympus Mons
Its like withdrawing from the Paris accords.

It simply energized the states to pursue real change.
With California's 43 active oil fields still producing? Yeah, real change my ass.

By the way, Canada has seen three oil train accidents already this year. But hey, at least the oil isn't being moved by pipeline because they cause global warming don't'cha know.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
LOL

CA OR and WA are all major burners of Western Canadian oil.

You're a major burner. :lol:

Its like withdrawing from the Paris accords.

It simply energized the states to pursue real change.

And got the climate deniers egged on.

They're going completely mental right now.

Trumpites probably think it's about oil

They're clearly bothered by this news.
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,619
6,262
113
Olympus Mons
Climate deniers...

Because fossil fuels are on the decline.

https://marketrealist.com/2018/01/us-natural-gas-consumption-hit-record-2018-2019?source=nasdaq

US Natural Gas Consumption Could Hit a Record in 2018 and 2019

By Gordon Kristopher
Jan 12, 2018 | 7:06 AM
Well that's understandable when you have idiots like Pelosi and other sub-moronic leftards who seem to forget that A)Natags is a fossil fuel and B) it's 25x more potent a GHG than CO2.

Isn't it funny how "green energy" relies so heavily on fossil fuels in order to be useful?