Impeach Trump!!

spilledthebeer

Executive Branch Member
Jan 26, 2017
9,296
4
36
#QAnon #QAnon8chan Reported That Former "President Barack HUSSEIN Obama Formerly Retained Counsel"

[youtube]v_7zohQXGxU&t=41953s[/youtube]

TODAY, former President Barack HUSSEIN Obama formally retained counsel (9/WW).

yeah
;)
insane nonsense

NEMESIS!! OBAMA SOLD OUT BY ONE OF HIS FORMER OFFICIALS ON LIVE TV

[youtube]osoZTXL9g1Y[/youtube]

FISA MEMO RELEASE!!! Jason Chaffetz Makes Shocking Revelation

[youtube]nzB3218ctvE[/youtube]



Bend over

Your ass has been sold to civil service union Hogs by govt and you should probably just bend over and learn to enjoy getting Lie-berally SCREWED!

LIE-berals talk often and loudly about justice and fairness and equality- but its all just Fake News of the sort LIE-berals enjoy! Consider:

Item: A claimant for refugee status in Canada has worked the system with such success that the Federal government estimates it will cost one million dollars to get proper court authority to carry out the deportation of the claimant. While the claimant was working through his multitude of immigration system options, the claimant was simultaneous accused, tried and convicted of committing 76 separate crimes. Eleven of the crimes involve what Crown attorneys describe as `substantial violence`.

Might we save some money by streamlining the immigration process to weed out blatant criminals? And night this not be a way to control government costs and inflation? And should we not condemn the LIE-beral immigration policy as nothing more than an election scam in which LIE-beral friendly judges select immigrants who they believe will most devotedly support LIE-beral candidates at election time? LIE-berals are certainly NOT looking hard for people who have the skills to succeed in Canada; nor are they seeking out immigrants who RESPECT western civilization!


Item: A man accused of stealing twenty seven million dollars by fraudulent means was recently set free by the Ontario legal system, without the accused ever spending time in jail or even facing a trial. The government stated that it lacks the resources to try the accused in a fair and timely fashion and so felt compelled to release the accused.

Item: LIE-beral hug a thug judges have released SEVEN accused killers from jail so far this year- without a trial. LIE-berals are worried that the rights of the accused killers will be violated because it will take too long for our overloaded LIE-beral legal system- deliberately ham-strung by judges seeking votes on behalf of LIE-berals- to bring them to trial!

Item: Canadian government at every level are facing unprecedented economic pressure to reduce the debt loads being carried. Proposed solutions include massive tax increases which would be politically very unpopular and would force the country back into recession or even depression. Other options involve massive spending cuts that wold result in reductions in spending for schools and hospitals and police forces.

Given that the police are finding it ever harder to solve murder cases and that an increasing number of murders involve complex and consequently expensive investigations into organized crime activity is it reasonable to reduce the number of police officers available to combat these more sophisticated criminals or should we view a reduction in the police budget as a threat to our own finances and personal well being?

Given that a significant portion of crime is committed by immigrants selected by LIE-berals for sentimental/vote buying reasons rather than because of their excellent education- is it reasonable to expect that we could save money on policing costs by tightening up immigration rules so that nly those who have needed skills can enter Canada? WE MUST deal with home grown criminals and drug addicts but what reason is there to import MORE screwups?

Given that there is a steady increase in the number of dangerous bacteria/super bugs contaminating our hospitals is it reasonable to cut the number of cleaners and nurses in our hospitals as a way to balance the books? Or should we view such cost cutting measures as a direct threat to our own health and safety?

Given that the education budget is rising at a rate fifty percent faster than the health care budget- and that the number of students enrolled is falling while the number of sick people needing medical aid is rising- is it reasonable to let LIE-berals continue spending in this lop sided way? Shall we ask why LIE-berals are deliberately rationing health care while fawning over teachers and does it have to do with buying teacher votes so LIE-berals can cling to power at any price?

Is it reasonable to assume that some government services are more necessary than others and that in these troubled times we should expect our government to identify these less important services and cut there? Such things as grants to radical groups like Black Lives Matter, arts grants to crazy people producing `modern` art that most of us hate, adding MORE politicians to Toronto Silly Hall instead of cutting their numbers as they deserve, expanding office budgets for self serving advertising and self serving `communications` all come to mind.

Item: LIE-beral hug a thug judges have ruled that Canada Post MUST deliver mail even though it contains illegal items that are prohibited and or fraudulent under Canadian law. Such `fraudulent items` include forged Province of Ontario Health cards being sent into the country from places like Nigeria, along with forged passports and other such documents originating from various places overseas. Gun parts and ammunition in packages under a certain weight limit are also delivered. Canada Post is expected to notify the local police when postal inspectors discover these smaller illegal items and the police are then expected to post a watch on the address or post box to see who comes to pick up the contraband. Once somebody picks up the mail police may then move in to make an arrest or may continue to observe the suspects to try to trace the network of fraud artists using and selling the forged documents or other illegal items. Since police budgets are so strained that they are having trouble investigating murders or convicting multi million dollar fraud artists might it not be cheaper simply to destroy contraband items at the point of entry into the country?
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
The biggest reason to impeach Trump is to get his lunatic followers to shut up, like Danny Boy, Spillthebeer, Wally, p[gs and others. Trumps an idiot but his followers are not only nuts, they are dangerous.

 
Last edited:

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,887
126
63
The biggest reason to impeach Trump is to get his lunatic followers to shut up, like Danny Boy, Spillthebeer, Wally, p[gs and others. Trumps an idiot but his followers are not only nuts, they are dangerous.
Kaboom, another prog head explodes. Delicious.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
The biggest reason to impeach Trump is to get his lunatic followers to shut up, like Danny Boy, Spillthebeer, Wally, p[gs and others. Trumps an idiot but his followers are not only nuts, they are dangerous.


Make me yah butt wipe.
;)
For a guy who can only talk other people's thinks, that's pretty funny...!
:)
LOOPED indeed!
So have you got your sax in your hands and are YOU going to do them violins?

Say Hi to that Weinstien guy...He was famous for that kind of housecoat action!!!
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
The biggest reason to impeach Trump is to get his lunatic followers to shut up, like Danny Boy, Spillthebeer, Wally, p[gs and others. Trumps an idiot but his followers are not only nuts, they are dangerous.


Don't forget me, Cliffy! :) :)
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,501
8,102
113
B.C.
The biggest reason to impeach Trump is to get his lunatic followers to shut up, like Danny Boy, Spillthebeer, Wally, p[gs and others. Trumps an idiot but his followers are not only nuts, they are dangerous.

Yes I want to take paradise and put up a parking lot .
 

B00Mer

Make Canada Great Again
Sep 6, 2008
47,127
8,145
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.canadianforums.ca
Danbone, the Biggest Trump Knob Gobbler on CC. :lol:

Ah Ha! Ha! Walter gave me a red for that comment... he is obviously jealous that he doesn’t hold that title..

No worries Walter, you’re a close second to Danbones, for the biggest Trump Knob Gobbler.. PiGS a close 3rd place.

Boomer, the MOST chicken shit coward on the forum
;)
come on over and we'll talk face to face elmo

..are you making online threats Danbons?

We will have start calling you CC Rambo. :lol:
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,501
8,102
113
B.C.
Ah Ha! Ha! Walter gave me a red for that comment... he is obviously jealous that he doesn’t hold that title..

No worries Walter, you’re a close second to Danbones, for the biggest Trump Knob Gobbler.. PiGS a close 3rd place.



..are you making online threats Danbons?

We will have start calling you CC Rambo. :lol:
Hey boner did you jerk yourself this morning ?
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,041
6,160
113
Twin Moose Creek
Grounds for impeachment if Trump lied about trying to fire Mueller – Ken Starr

Twisting Starr's words to make it look like he is in favour of impeachment

If Donald Trump lied to the American people when he called reports he tried to fire Robert Mueller “fake news”, that would be grounds for impeachment, the independent counsel who investigated the Clinton White House said on Sunday.

Ken Starr, who used Bill Clinton’s false statements about his relationship with Monica Lewinsky as grounds for impeachment, told ABC’s This Week: “Lying to the American people is a serious issue that has to be explored. I take lying to the American people very, very seriously, so absolutely.”
Starr said: “That is something Bob Mueller should look at.”
Mueller, the special counsel, is investigating Russia’s interference in the 2016 presidential election, including alleged collusion between Russian officials and Trump aides, and numerous instances of possible obstruction of justice by the president.
The New York Times and others reported this week that in June 2016, Trump ordered White House counsel Donald McGahn to fire Mueller. McGahn reportedly said he would resign rather than carry our the order, which he said would have a devastating effect on Trump’s presidency.
Trump publicly dismissed the Times report, calling it “fake news”. Since June, the president has repeatedly denied publicly that he was considering firing Mueller. White House officials have also repeatedly claimed the president has not discussed firing him.

Kellyanne Conway told ABC in August: “He’s not discussed firing Bob Mueller.” Trump’s chief counsel, John Dowd, told USA Today the same month: “That’s never been on the table, never. It’s a manifestation of the media.”
Trump told reporters at the same time: “I haven’t given it any thought.” He added: “Well, I’ve been reading about it from you people. You say, ‘Oh, I’m going to dismiss him.’ No, I’m not dismissing anybody.”
Some Republicans said on Sunday that reports Trump had to be talked down from firing Mueller were a serious concern and should prompt congressional action.
Attempting to fire Mueller would mean “the end of [Trump’s] presidency,” the South Carolina senator Lindsay Graham, a sponsor of potential legislation, said on ABC.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Ah Ha! Ha! Walter gave me a red for that comment... he is obviously jealous that he doesn’t hold that title..

Look at it the way I do, Boomer, they say more about the donor than the recipient. I got 31 from Putz since yesterday. I don't think there's a better way of confirming how f**king stupid he is.! I just love getting them. :) :) :)

Grounds for impeachment if Trump lied about trying to fire Mueller – Ken Starr

Twisting Starr's words to make it look like he is in favour of impeachment

Ken Starr!! Isn't he the same asshole who raised a bunch of shit during Clinton's term in office? Can't recall the details but I'm almost positive he's the same jerk! I would have thought someone might have assassinated the asshole before now!
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,041
6,160
113
Twin Moose Creek
Look at it the way I do, Boomer, they say more about the donor than the recipient. I got 31 from Putz since yesterday. I don't think there's a better way of confirming how f**king stupid he is.! I just love getting them. :) :) :)



Ken Starr!! Isn't he the same asshole who raised a bunch of shit during Clinton's term in office? Can't recall the details but I'm almost positive he's the same jerk! I would have thought someone might have assassinated the asshole before now!

Yes the same guy the article I posted is a twist of words compared to the interview he gave on Fox this morning. On Fox he basically said that he technically can be impeached for lying, but, hasn't seen enough evidence for this scenario to happen
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
impeachment is a political action, not a legal one.

this investigation is a political investigation. If they raise it up to a Grand Jury investigation it becomes a legal investigation.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
The grammies just had the worst rating ever because of TRUMPHATE and virtue signalling.
:)

Grammys Shed Nearly 10 Million Viewers From 2017
TV Ratings: Grammy Awards Shed Nearly 10 Million Viewers From 2017 – Variety

lol just like the trumphaters did to football.

Why are you so interested in my genital’s, that’s kind’a freaky.. is that what you are, a freak?

What genitals?
:)
Look at your avatar! Your PUBLICLY DISPLAYED MISOGYNISTIC unit looks VERY FEMBOOB
talk about "im peach mental"...look what you got for gear!!!
 

spilledthebeer

Executive Branch Member
Jan 26, 2017
9,296
4
36
Danbones, quit sniffing cheap glue bags.. then again I guess that’s all you can afford living in a homeless shelter. :lol:

Poor silly LIE-berals- frntic to salvage something- anything from the Clinton debacle! The guy who made the LIghtfoot parody- by which he reworked Lightfoot`s song Wreck of the Edmond Fitzgerald into an AMAZING parody The Wreck of the Hilary Clinton on Youtube- complete with damning and devastating news clippings should get a medal- OR AN OSCAR! The guy is VERY FUNNY! And he can sing decently too! If The Wreck of the Hilary Clinton ever becomes widely known she will NEVER leave the mansion again!


Here is an article making a logical point- that will be scorned by bigoted LIE-berals who believe THEY are the only people in the world who have any right to be offended by anything! With some comments of my own in brackets):

If a judge can’t wear a MAGA hat, a public servant shouldn’t wear a niqab

BY ANTHONY FUREY, POSTMEDIA NETWORK
FIRST POSTED: WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 30, 2017 05:19 PM EDT. UPDATED: WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 30, 2017 05:30 PM EDT

This file photo taken on January 20, 2017 shows hats displayed for sale on the morning of Donald Trump's inauguration as the 45th President of the United States in Washington, DC. A misconduct hearing opened on August 23, 2017 into a Canadian judge's wearing of a "Make America Great Again" campaign cap in court the day after Donald Trump was elected US president last November. Judges in Canada are forbidden from expressing partisan political views as a way of ensuring the appearance of their independence. Ontario Court Justice Bernd Zabel said wearing the red cap bearing Trump's campaign slogan was meant as a dig at colleagues who had supported Trump's rival for the US presidency, Hillary Clinton. (MOLLY RILEY/AFP/Getty Images)

(LIE-berals object to civil servants making partisan views known? Who would have guessed that as they have been ignoring very partisan attack ads by civil service Hog unions for years! LIE-beral hypocrisy dictates that if the partisan is in their favour then it is NOT partisan! WE all recognize that women who wear the hijab- and the men who order this clothing- ALL hold VERY PARTISAN religious views! So why is it bad for a Cdn judge to support an ELECTED leader in the United States DEMOCRACY while hijab wearers support the destruction of democratic Israel and the expulsion of Jews- AND want us to join with terror groups such as Hamas and Hezzbollah to attack Jews and Yankees? With the added bonus that as numbers of Muslims in Canada rise- there is a corresponding INCREASE in anti Semitic hate crimes here in Canada as well!)

Regardless of one’s politics, pretty much everyone agrees that Justice Bernd Zabel shouldn’t have worn a Make America Great Again hat in his Hamilton, Ontario courtroom the day after the U.S. presidential election.

Last week, Zabel faced a disciplinary panel to answer for his unofficial wardrobe choice.

He said it was all a joke at the hearing, but had previously said he wanted to stick it to all the Hillary Clinton supporters in his workplace.

Love Trump. Hate Trump. It doesn’t matter. As the Americans say, justice should be blind. Let’s keep the politics out of it.

And while we’re at it, let’s talk about applying this principle consistently across the public service, whenever Canadians interact with their government.

We’re pretty good at it in most respects. It’s not like polling clerks on election day are allowed to wear buttons supporting candidates. Police officers, firefighters and other law enforcement have their uniforms. We run a tight ship.

(No- they don’t wear political buttons on election day but civil service Hogs DO get into a HUGE conflict of interest with their LIE-beral friendly ads and sneering attacks on Conservative politicians at election time! It’s a blatant and glaring conflict of interest that Ontari-owe LIE-berals are only now beginning to rein in- in a small way as Hogs grow frustrated with LIE-beral failure to honour the MASSIVE, economy breaking IOU`s that LIE-berals have offered in exchange for Hog support inv the past but have not yet paid for - in a nice exchange for more gravy from LIE-berals!)

But still, the Quebec government felt it needed to go one step further to codify some form of this into law. Not for overt political displays this time, but religion.

Bill 62, which is supported by the governing Quebec Liberals and now working its way through committee, calls for a “duty of religious neutrality” on the part of all public servants.

(The Niqab is certainly a powerful statement of a particular political opinion! It is most commonly worn by women who too often have a hostility to western democracy and social standards! Thus it IS offensive to many Cdns in the same way that a Nazi swastika infuriates Jews or a burning Klan Kross insults black people!)

That effectively means a ban on face coverings, the most prominent of which is the niqab.

(There is also logic in banning the niqab for security reasons as no self respecting jihadist jerk would wish to bring his female `property` to Canada if they would have to walk the streets immodestly dressed just like Cdn “sluts”! WE might be able to weed out some security threats simply by clarifying our dress code?)

This has become an issue in the NDP leadership race, of all places, where the party is hoping to woo back those voters Jack Layton first enticed in the 2011 election but that Justin Trudeau won back in 2015.

Quebec politics is an entirely different scene. There you have voters who would strongly support both the NDP and niqab bans, the sort of blend that wouldn’t happen in Anglo NDP strongholds like Toronto and Vancouver.

The candidates are divided. Guy Caron, from Quebec, is OK with the bill.

But Ontario’s Jagmeet Singh calls it Islamophobic and Niki Ashton posted on social media: “You can’t tell a woman what she should be wearing.”

(Yeah you can tell a woman what to wear! Its done all the time in work places where a certain standard of appearance is required! You KNOW they ain’t going to hire a Muslim woman dressed in traditional costume at Hooters for rather obvious reasons! We routinely regulate how much clothing a woman may strip off in a business setting such as a stripper bar- and we regulate WHERE this activity may take place along with limitations on what manner of interaction will be permitted between naked strippers and drunk bar patrons! We reserve the right to tell a woman she cannot wear a swastika and we ban the public use of certain words such as “nigger” so why not ban the niqab as an equally offensive religious symbol? It would even be an aid to our national security as Muslim radicals would be less likely to emigrate with their women to Canada if the women were legally required to appear in public in an indecent state- just like Cdn sluts!)

(LIE-berals are spinning themselves in circles as they struggle to PRETEND that there is a separation between religious freedom and political freedom in the twisted minds of Muslim Jihadists!)