Faulty Keystone XL Construction led to massive oil spill

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
TransCanada officially sucks.


Keystone leak probe points to damage from 3,000-kg weight commonly used to secure pipelines

A U.S. regulator's preliminary investigation into the biggest oil pipeline spill this year has raised a red flag that could trigger an extensive and costly inspection of tens of thousands of miles of underground energy lines.

The 5,000-barrel leak on TransCanada Corp's Keystone pipeline on Nov. 16 in South Dakota might have stemmed from damage caused by a weight put in place when it was built in 2008, the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration said in a report published on Tuesday.

Weights are used to prevent pipelines from moving and reduce the risk of damage or ruptures when water tables rise. The regulator's finding has implications for the 2,687-mile (4,324 km) pipeline and others throughout the world.

The weights, which tip the scales at 7,000 pounds (3,175 kg) or more, are commonly used, but only the pipeline operators know where they are located.

Damage from weights "could happen on other segments of this pipeline and other pipelines," said Najmedin Meshkati, professor of civil and environmental engineering at the University of Southern California.

The Keystone pipeline carries 590,000 barrels per day from Alberta's oil sands to U.S. refineries. TransCanada's proposed Keystone XL line would add another 830,000 bpd of capacity.

Keystone leak probe points to damage from 3,000-kg weight commonly used to secure pipelines - Calgary - CBC News
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
I worked on a gas lateral in Conklin and we used what we called swamp weights which clamped around the pipeline whenever it went through muskeg or crossed water. That was like 1982, but I imagine they use the same sort of thing today.
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
Yes they were concrete U shaped weights that were bolted around the pipe where they thought there was a chance that buoyancy could cause the pipe to shift.
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
They also used a heavier gauge pipe in river crossing for safety if I'm not mistaken, although, working on the ambulance I was just an observer, didn't have hands on experience in that part of the job, but I learned quite a bit in five months...
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
I don't think the gas pipeline is any different but I have never worked on an oil pipeline.
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,619
6,262
113
Olympus Mons
Soooo TransCanada officially sucks because they used the exact same kind of weight commonly used throughout the industry?

And if 5000 bbls is the biggest spill this year, well hell, it's been a good year.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Not much more then the amount of oil that leaks out of crappy old outboard motors on the great lakes every year.
 

OmegaOm

Electoral Member
Nov 4, 2017
166
0
16
Not much more then the amount of oil that leaks out of crappy old outboard motors on the great lakes every year.

Good point Danbones. With the new Tesla car that can accelerate faster then most cars, why is there no electric high performance boat motors yet. But they will come shortly I can see. It is a good market to be first in. And I bet many are working on it now.
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,041
6,160
113
Twin Moose Creek
I worked on a gas lateral in Conklin and we used what we called swamp weights which clamped around the pipeline whenever it went through muskeg or crossed water. That was like 1982, but I imagine they use the same sort of thing today.

We used concrete weights in 75....in Petrolia ontario and Rigaud Quebec

Yes they were concrete U shaped weights that were bolted around the pipe where they thought there was a chance that buoyancy could cause the pipe to shift.

They also used a heavier gauge pipe in river crossing for safety if I'm not mistaken, although, working on the ambulance I was just an observer, didn't have hands on experience in that part of the job, but I learned quite a bit in five months...

I don't think the gas pipeline is any different but I have never worked on an oil pipeline.

Gas is more buoyant than oil so the chances of floating are higher, and since it was TCPL first attempt at oil they probably didn't want to take a chance with sandbags that are pretty much industry standard now due to the stresses of the pipe and ease of strapping to the pipe.

It is possible that a cement weight was placed to close to a weld and caused stress to the weld, but the weld would have to be poor, the pipe will buckle or crease before failure and wouldn't have passed the sizing pig test before production. The argument of corrosion is laughable on a pipeline this new, Like DaSleeper says the smart pig would have caught any of the above deficiency if it was deployed on a line this new. I imagine it will be running like crazy now and the results will be independently reviewed.
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
The 23 mile section of line in Petrolia On. in '75 was actually a repair job because the year before the welders had told their bosses that the pipe and the rod steel didn't match and it's only when a deeper analysis of the weld xrays over the winter that this was revealed.to be true.
It doesn't take much to cause a leak...
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
118,585
14,558
113
Low Earth Orbit
the number of train cars carrying crude oil by rail around the country has skyrocketed - increasing 5,100% from 2008 to 2014, according to the Association of American Railroads.